• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The issue of globalization has been an ongoing process that raised many questions in the world. It is indeed a complex subject that is examined in many different perspectives.

Extracts from this document...


The issue of globalization has been an ongoing process that raised many questions in the world. It is indeed a complex subject that is examined in many different perspectives. Globalization, the integration of international economy, is no doubt a liberalistic idea. Not only is the emergence of this idea debatable, its consequences and its effects are tremendously important. To fully understand globalization, one must analyze the aftermath of this movement. During the 1960s, several theorists began to analyze the consequences of globalization. It was evident at that time that the rise of international inequality increasingly divided the world into two parts: the development and underdevelopment. Therefore, I will examine the different explanations of how development and underdevelopment countries occurred and how the later developing countries can successfully develop. To do so, I will use three different theorists, namely Rostow, Wallerstein, and Gerschenkron. With a liberal perspective on development, Rostow sees the necessary conditions of economic development as set stages. He identifies it as the preconditions for take-off and the take-off. This theory puts all countries on a unilateral path and assumes that all societies go through 5 stages of economic development. ...read more.


This leads to a process of capital accumulation at a global scale. Politically, Wallerstein mentions that nation-states as variables. States are used by class forces to pursuer their interest, in the case of core countries. Imperialism refers to the domination of weak peripheral regions by strong core states. While hegemony refers to the existence of one core state temporarily outstripping the rest. Hegemonic powers maintain a stable balance of power and enforce free trade as long as it is to their advantage. However, hegemony is temporary due to class struggles and the diffusion of technical advantages. This is what Wallerstein considers as internal contradictions. This contradiction will eventually trigger change. In order to move a country's status from the periphery to the core, Wallerstein proposes import substitution as a solution. Import substitution is a phenomenon that responds to external disruption of trade by domestically producing substitutes for those goods previously imported. This is a policy that the governments in less developed countries may use to undertake industrialization and structural changes. Wallerstein's theory is one that is contrast to Rostow. While Rostow believes that all countries have the potential to go through economic development through the five take-off stages, Wallerstein supports the core and periphery to create globalization. ...read more.


Its core-periphery model fits the model of globalization. Sadly, the theory is written in the interest of the international economy and assumes that exploitation of developing is needed. Developing countries' only way out of the periphery is to create social change and accumulate capital or foreign investment. Gerschenkron on the other hand, brings hope to the developing countries. It persists that countries can develop through a process of catching up. Additionally, there are benefits to this catching up as mentioned above. Moreover, we understand that there are multiple paths to development (unlike Rostow). One thing that must be kept in mind is the time constraints. The process of development is taken in a course of 20-30 years. The hope for possible successful development for any country cannot be explained under one theory. Theories are ideal types that can be used as a model. However, theories do not apply to every country. Gerschenkron understands that different countries have different conditions. This means that certain available resources, geographical location, and relations in the international economy will lead countries to develop in different ways. It is important to remember that we can only take the theories and adapt its advantages that will apply to specific countries but not assume it works for the world as a whole. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Global Interdependence & Economic Transition section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Global Interdependence & Economic Transition essays

  1. Consider the Defining Features of Dependency Theory and distinguish its Major Variants. Discuss the ...

    Such as, a consequence and part of the process of the world expansion of capitalism, a part that is necessary to and integrally linked with it. Three central propositions that are common to all dependistas are; firstly, persistent surplus extraction or persistent exploitation by the centre, from the periphery, this systematically deprives the periphery of investable resources.

  2. Can developing countries ever catch up with developed countries

    Insights similar to Frank's have been developed by numerous other authors. For instance, Immanuel Wallerstein argues that "as more and more states have been drawn into the world economy a single worldwide division of labour has been created" between core, periphery and semi-periphery17.

  1. Economic Growth & Development Questions and answers.

    This may be true for other countries where the GDP per capita may be rising, but at the same time poverty might be increasing, inequality in the distribution of income might be rising and massive environmental damage may be occurring.

  2. Core and periphery of Brazil

    There is a large market for consumer goods and services, with a thriving work force, created by the large population. The South East of Brazil was the centre of trade in the country's colonial history too. Brazil was a Portuguese colony for over 300 years and the Portuguese exploited the land and exported minerals to Europe.

  1. Different types of travel destination. Study of Cardiff and Barcelona as travel destinations.

    This tells us that the passengers are not coming in to Barcelona so we must look for a reason for this. In 2007 the worldwide recession started so this may be a reason for why people are not going to Barcelona as much as they were before.

  2. Development of the leisure and recreation industry

    This is a chart showing the participation trends in 1986 and 1998 with these two figures I will estimate what the trend will be in 1993. Activity 1986 1998 Prediction 2003 Reading books 59 67 69 Watching TV 99 99 100 Listening to the radio 87 89 89 Listening to

  1. What is Dependency Theory and how does it apply to development?

    would sell it back to a poor country. But, as a matter of fact, the rich countries would sell their manufactured products to the poor countries for more money than the poor countries would sell their primary resources to the rich countries.

  2. Assess the view that the relationship between superpowers and the developing world is a ...

    China has helped Africa develop in many ways. Since 2004, China has made deals in at least seven resource-rich African countries for a total of $14 billion. In Angola the Chinese have helped reconstruct and stabilise the country after its long civil war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work