• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Modernisation Theory is the only accurate way of defining development. Assess the arguments for and against this argument.

Extracts from this document...


The Modernisation Theory is the only accurate way of defining development. Assess the arguments for and against this argument. The modernisation theory argues that development is a evolutionary process that countries progress through; seeks to explain why poorer, traditional societies have failed to develop into modern ones. However, immediately it could be argued that this argument is flawed, because there is much debate over what development is and how it should be defined. For example, whether it is economic measures such as GDP or GNP should be used, or whether it should be social measures such as HDI. Nevertheless, the modernisation theory needs to be exhausted, to assess whether it accurately defines development, or whether other theories offer a better explanation. As Europe revolutionised, sociologists began explaining how societies began to develop. Early modernisation theorists such as Comte and Durkheim believed that more advance societies had evolved from agricultural ones; eventually all societies would follow along this evolutionary path. After WW2, policy makers began to put in place the aims of the modernisation theory. The modernisation theory assumed that poorer traditional societies had failed to develop because they had not industrialised, in addition to the lack of individualism, capitalism and science. Moreover, the modernisation theory offers several explanations for LEDC poverty. ...read more.


However, it can be argued that the mode theory is being ethnocentric: arguing that the LEDCs are lacking is some respect, and they have "deficit model" of development. Moreover, it can be argued that some MEDCs retain their traditional values, this is especially visible in the newly industrialised countries such as India and China. The dependency theory would argue that this process of development would exploit the LEDCs; and bring upon them a new form of Western imperialism. Frank argues that this would create a "chain of dependency" , between the core (MEDCs) and periphery (LEDCs).The worlds system theory (Wallerstein) would look at this on a global scale and argue that the MEDCs would use this system to exploit the LEDCs. What' more, the neo-liberals would be critical of so much government intervention. It is evident, that Rostows process of development offers a optimistic outlook for LEDCs, however, it is ethnocentric. It is evident that countries can retain traditional values and modernise. What's more, it mostly looks at economic factors whereas, other modernisation theorist believe cultural factors to be more important, therefore giving the theory a more whole and accurate definition of development. Some aspects of the modernisation theory looks more at cultural factors to explain poverty in LEDCs. For example, Parsons argued that LEDCs are dominated by traditional religious beliefs which prevent development and make them fatalistic about their future. ...read more.


One, could argue that the modernisation theory has a optimistic outlook on the development of LEDCs, however, they assume LEDCs need subservient their culture and tradition to achieve modernity. The dependency theory would argue that the "motors", driven by the West, serve to take control and exploit the LEDCs. Putting them under a new form of economic and Western imperialism. In addition, the neo-liberals would discourage such intervention, and favour the free market and competition as being the best way for LEDCs to develop. Overall, it is evident that the modernisation theory can provide a fairly accurate view of development in the world today. However, it assumes that traditional values and norms of the LEDCcs hold them back, making their argument ethnocentric. In addition, the modernisation theory is too simplistic, and overlooks many factors. For example, the dependency theory would argue that the core (MEDCS), simply hold and exploit the peripheries (LEDCs)., via "neo-colonialism. What's more, the world systems theory would arguer that the whole global system needs to be examined, with a focus on economics. Yet, despite the criticisms- neo-modernisation theorist's have hit back. Modernisation theorist's such as Eisenstadht and Dahrendorf have come to different conclusions from the earlier theorist's - Parsons and Rostow. They argue that Modernisation can be used with local traditions rather than just looking at Western models, with a more value-based approach. Together, they offer a much more accurate definition of development, than the simplistic modernisation theory alone. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Global Interdependence & Economic Transition section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Global Interdependence & Economic Transition essays

  1. Tourism in LEDC's creates environmental and social problems whilst bringing limited economic benefits. How ...

    This means that in reality, LEDC's only receive a small proportion of the money spent on tourism. Jobs are often very poorly paid and therefore do not contribute significantly to the development of the country. The income may not filter down to the majority of the population but it may be siphoned off by the ruling elite.

  2. Core and periphery of Brazil

    The Core has its Problems too, overcrowding of people and competition for business, resulted in the core overheating. People move to the Southeast to improve their quality of life. However so many people now live and work in the big cities of the core that this begins to create its own problems.

  1. Consider the Defining Features of Dependency Theory and distinguish its Major Variants. Discuss the ...

    In capitalistic economies the most important component for the drive to expand, is the capacity to enlarge the scale of capital. This involves the creation of new technologies and the continuous expansion of the production of capital goods, such as machinery and equipment, to allow the continuing growth of enterprise expansion and capital accumulation.

  2. The use of trade is the most important tool to achieve economic growth in ...

    Many farmers in developing countries are struggling to make profits as influential trading blocs restrict them. The most significant examples are the trading blocs of the EU and NAFTA. For example the EU subsidises local sugar beet farmers (the European Common Agricultural Policy)

  1. Why there is a need for world development?

    20% of the world's population live in MEDC's and own 80% of the world's wealth where as a massive 80% of the world's population live in LEDC's and have only 20% of the world's wealth. There are many causes of poverty and one of these is education.

  2. Spain: European Studies

    Spain is in south-western Europe, bordering the Bay of Biscay, Mediterranean Sea, North Atlantic Ocean, and Pyrenees Mountains, southwest of France. Spain also borders its neighbours Portugal and its north of Algeria. This is a map of Spain and South- Western Europe: Spain flag is made up of Spain's individual regions.

  1. Current development issues in Brazil

    Moreover, eco-tourism could be an option to shift population demographics towards service and tourism, and away from destruction of natural resources, as it could guarantee an income directly beneficial to local communities. According to the Brazilian Tourism Office (2002), public and private capital investment in Brazil's Travel and Tourism Sector

  2. What is Dependency Theory and how does it apply to development?

    To prevent this, the wealthy countries get wealthier and then they can re-enforce their system to protect themselves from being turned on by the developing countries. Capital continues to transfer from developing countries to developed countries. This will then result to a deficiency of wealth in the poor countries, however

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work