• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The population of humans, on earth, has always been dependant on the availability of resources.

Extracts from this document...


The population of humans, on earth, has always been dependant on the availability of resources. We are not in equilibrium with the ecosystems and once these resources run out, so will our time on earth. These models try to explain how long we have left, and why this is the case. The main reason that these models are only valuable for explaining the 'past', and not predicting the 'future' is that there are to many variables, such as war and famine, that they do not take into account. The models all show a pattern that keeps repeating, in the case of Malthus, the population is limited by 'food supply'. But this isn't always the case, as explained by Esther Boserup's model, which explains that 'nature is the mother of invention'. ...read more.


Famine also causes emigration to other, more prosperous countries, but also leads to a decrease in population due to death rates increasing. These type of events are impossible to predict, but still play a huge part in the way population stands against the resources available. The development of LEDCs has also not been taken into account by Malthus' and Club of Rome's models. Boserup, on the other hand, for foresaw these actions, to an extent as she explained that when the population starts overwhelming the natural resources, we find methods to revert the situation (i.e. development). With LEDCs developing populations will stop increasing so dramatically which will release the strain on our resources. With the introduction of contraception to LEDCs, the birth rates are starting to decrease, and this means that there will be less people requiring the valuable resources, such as water. ...read more.


This is another indicator that Boserup had the right idea that humans will think of a solution every time that resource-levels become low. All in all, both Malthus' and Club of Rome's models were much better at explaining the past than predicting the future as they do not take into account so many variables. Boserup's model, although not perfect, is a more accurate prediction of what is yet to come, as her theory that 'nature is the mother of invention', is true, to some extent, when humans are concerned. Her model takes into account the fact that people change when their lives are under too much pressure. LEDCs are starting to develop due to the realization that if they don't, they will have serious problems. Alastair Baillie Geography: Using examples explain why the 3 models of population growth are better at explaining the past than predicting the future ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Population & Settlement section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Population & Settlement essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline the theories Malthus and Boserup on impacts of population growth.

    4 star(s)

    In other words the more people they are the more pressure placed upon their current technology which would mean that there is more demand for new technology. Boserups argument was mainly that we would never run out of our food supply, as technology will always continue to get better and therefore keep up with demand.

  2. Urbanisation In LEDCs

    Such settlements are usually found in the least desirable land, which are at the edges of a city. In Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro many of the favelas are built on steep hillsides which are vulnerable to landslides. This is the land that no one else wants, so illegal

  1. How does Sen's approach to famine differ from the Malthusian approach?

    17 If 'the people' get involved in the development process then they will get what they want. Sen believes the word development goes hand in hand with democracy. With democracy citizens get rights, and one of the most basic rights is the right not to starve.

  2. Geography: Causes of Famine

    situation where underdeveloped countries cannot cope and due to world development famines root cause is now, it can be argued, becoming human processes. A Closer Look at a Natural Cause of Famine There are several natural processes which can cause famine but the most predominant cause with the biggest impact (as can be seen in figure 3)

  1. Geography revision - flooding - Urbanisation - Population problems

    For every mining job lost, another 50 jobs were lost. Male youth unemployment became very high. Poor housing and derelict landscape left the area unattractive to industries, as there are waste heaps, pollution, subsidence and other problems. Depression, divorce, and poor health are all negative effects.

  2. Why was Malthus wrong about Japan?

    By studying, what were tantamount to an early form of census, family reconstitution is possible and a better idea of the overall demographic change at that time in Japan is given. Generations of population historians have performed village studies and different generations have varying ideas about the trend in population.

  1. “There are differing interpretations of the relationship between world population and resources. Some people ...

    He believed that population growth was controlled by 'checks', checks being methods to prevent numbers of people increasing beyond the optimum population. He saw the checks as nature's way of controlling excessive growth in the population. The checks fall into three categories.

  2. Compare and contrast the population theories of Malthus and Boserup

    Which in a nut shell is when over cultivation of arable land will result in soil erosion and crop failures. As Boserup has a completely opposing view that increased population would increase food production.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work