• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23

The river Gwaun: Investigating how the course of the river changes from the source to the mouth.

Extracts from this document...


Introduction I am investigating how the course of the river changes from the source to the mouth. I will study the River Gwaun at 4 sites, starting at Gellifawr (near the source), then going to Pontfaen, then Llanychaer, then finally ending at Lower Fishguard, near the mouth where the river meets the Irish Sea. I went to do my fieldwork on the 20th May 2002 with my Geography class and another from my year. I was in a group of 5, with Richard Gledh�ll, Chr�s Strzeleck�, Jason Inglesant. Ashley Stone and James O'Shea. We worked in a group because it is the easiest and probably the only way to collect all the data we need at each site. We collected data from each of the 4 sites. Site 1 - Gellifawr This is close to the source and is situated in the Preseli Hills. The relief is steep and the banks are V-shaped, typical of parts of the river in the Upper Profile. The water and the banks are very muddy. The river was apparently flowing slowly, there was a lot of large, angular bed load and there was a few small waterfalls. There was evidence of turbulence at some parts of the river. Site 2 - Pontfaen This site was on a floodplain next to a farm. There was evidence of an ox-bow lake nearby, which shows the river had been meandering. The river is flowing quite fast and the bed load is mostly small sub-angular/rounded pebbles. The river is quite wide and had much clearer water than Site 1. The riverbanks were flat but there was an overhang. There was some evidence of man-management as there were big boulders on one side of the river (the side bordering the farm), which is presumably to stop eroding on to farmland and the small pebbles covered the bed to stop erosion and making the river deeper. ...read more.


15.82 25.37 18.154 All speeds in seconds Averages The average speed for each site is: Site 1 - 37.554 seconds Site 2 - 25.542 seconds Site 3 - 13.442 seconds Site 4 - 18.154 seconds Graphs Description The results show that the speed of flow increases from Site 1 to Site 3 but then decreases at Site 4. Part of this is due to erosion; part is due to human interference. In Site1, the bed load largely influences the speed. The bed load is mostly large and angular and the slowest speed of flow we recorded (1min5seconds - 2nd speed measured at Site 1) was so long because it was caught by bed load and had to be loosened otherwise it would have been void. In Site 2, the entire bed load was (evenly) spread out over the riverbed and was mainly small (round) pebbles. This had little effect on the speed. In Site 3, the bed load was inconsistent in size and shape and did not have a (big) impact on the speed of flow. In Site 4, the river had been modified so the speed of flow was fast (therefore less deposition at the riverbanks/on the riverbed which decreases the risk of flooding) but it was slower than Site 3 because it was at the mouth of the river so was beginning to slow down, because of the human interference and because most of the bed load is large to stop erosion and spread out along the riverbed to minimise flood risk. Discharge Hypothesis I predict the river discharge will increase from Gellifawr to Lower Fishguard. I think this because discharge = length x width x speed, and if they all increase like I predict, then the discharge would then subsequently increase. I will only use the average discharge because it is the most accurate/even/fair discharge and it gets complicated when deciding and justifying which speed goes with which width and which depth, etc. ...read more.


wrong were taken to either avoid or minimalise the damage caused by such events. Some decisions on methods can also change the outcome of an investigation; how many sites to go to? How many widths/depths/etc. should be recorded? How many repetitions should be done? Etc. Most of these factors are down to how much time you have to do your investigation. I couldn't do 10 widths and 10 repetitions or have 50 bed load or go to 12 sites, etc. because I was only at each site for 45 minutes and there would be no time for other things. Another important decision is to decide when to go. In summer there is less rainfall so the depth is lower than in winter, which can affect the discharge, speed and width, as well as speed, which then affects the hydraulic power and erosion levels. The field trip I went on was in June, but it was postponed twice because of torrential rain making it dangerous to work in, so the climate also affects the results. However, a lot of my predictions made in the hypotheses sections of each aspect measured were correct, or correct in parts. The ones that were not correct, particularly bed load and speed in Site 4, was because of human intervention and I believe that, had the river run its natural course, would be correct. I did successfully fulfil my aims, which were to investigate the changes in the river Gwaun as it goes from source to mouth and I have documented it well. Overall I am happy with my set of results. I believe that all of the results that were odd and other things that went wrong were unavoidable and it might have balanced out the conditions with other times of the year. Any errors with the results would be natural as they are never going to be perfect, especially if the methods are not done with top-of-the-range equipment and technology that professionals use. Geography Coursework: River Gwaun Fieldwork 2002 Liam Barnes 11o Candidate Number 1867 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology essays

  1. How a river changes from source to mouth

    The graphic shows how waterfalls and rapids are formed. The graphic shows how V-shaped valleys are formed V-shaped valleys are created due to erosion. This is because the river carries stones and rocks in its water. The force of the water (which is high in the upper course) and the grinding of rocks and stones cut down into the river bed to carve out a V-shaped valley.

  2. There are three sections in a river they are called: The upper Course, ...

    Gorge The Grand Canyon is a famous Gorge. It is very deep; it is almost a vertical Gorge.

  1. 'To what extent does the River Lyn conform to the Bradshaw model of River ...

    * The title could be split down in to key questions effectively. * The hypothesis and methodology could be written in a table to keep the word count lower. * The photos and analysis are good and help me to see, visually, the sites I took my measurements at.

  2. How does the Efficiency and Cross-Sectional Area of a River Change Down Stream?

    in North Yorkshire where I intended on doing several tests to acquire the data needed to answer my investigation question. I spent the day of the visit collecting the data using methods that can be seen in the methodology table on page 3, fig.

  1. Study the downstream changes of Loughton Brook.

    The gradient is then measured in degrees. Two ranging poles and a gun clinometer are required. Height of the Banks The height of the bank is measured from the water till the bank. A ranging pole goes in the water and the second ranging pole forms a right angle from

  2. Edexcel Geography B Unit 3 Coursework

    The measurements of each group were then averaged out. A table below is shown to display the results regarding the variables that are relevant to my investigation. Table 3.1 Site Distance from source (m) Average width (m) Average wetted perimeter (m)

  1. Does the river Alyn follow Bradshaw's model?

    Hydraulic Radius (graph 7) - Again there is no relationship between hydraulic radius and the distance along the profile. The greatest value was 0.355 at 180m and the least was 0.07 at 450 m and 270m Wetted Perimeter (graph 8)

  2. My hypotheses are:The character of the course of the River Bollin will change along ...

    These are formed when the river travels in between the hills, and appear to "interlock" on either side of the river. The valleys become V shaped as loose material falls down into the stream and is washed away. The second site was further down the hills, closer to sea level,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work