To test if processes of deposition are stronger than processes of erosion on the beach.
Karl Bowers 11Bu Friday 25th June 2004
Aim 1- Destructive or Constructive enquiry:
Aim 1
To test if processes of deposition are stronger than processes of erosion on the beach.
The first aim was carried out at site 2 on Deal beach, by the Groynes. This was mainly because we needed the Groynes to assist us in the investigation. The other site could have been suitable as well, but where my group was specifically positioned, the pier was there and that could have interfered with our results.
There was a purpose of this particular aim – to discover what was shaping deal beach on the day of our visit. To successfully do this, we had to se if the beach was being destructed by erosion or if it was being constructed by deposition. The only way we could do this way by counting how many waves were producing and breaking per minute on the beach.
Theory
On the British coastlines, waves are responsible for pretty much all of the erosion. When a wave approaches the coast, it is slowed by friction from the seabed, but the top part of the wave will continue at its constant speed. The wave has nothing underneath it to support, it, so it will have to fall, and crash against the beach itself, or even a cliff face. Depending on whether the wave is constructive or destructive, it will either erode or deposit materials onto the beach. We worked out that if there was more than 10 waves per minute, then the wave was destructive (eroding the beach) but if there were less than 10 waves per minute, then the wave was constructive (depositing materials on the beach) On the day of the visit, if the waves were constructive, then the swash would have been stronger than the backwash and more of the load would end up being deposited on the beach.