• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can hazards be controlled and managed?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Hazards To what extent can hazards be controlled and managed? Hazards are the bane of most LEDC's throughout the world retarding development and causing colossal amounts of destruction and death, killing over a hundred and forty people in one sea surge alone in 1991 in Bangladesh. This has meant that there has been a desperate response to these natural phenomena by rich and poor governments alike to reduce the affects of natural hazards, be it through controlling the hazard or managing it. There are many different natural hazards that people suffer from and many different ways by which governments and people and control and manage them, however, I cannot speak here about all of them in sufficient detail, so I have decided to concentrate, on the most dangerous type of hazard, floods, which cause the most death and destruction than any hazard, affecting 32% of all people affected by natural hazards. Than I shall speak about how drought, which causes amazing amounts of damage and affects 30% of all people affected by hazards, but causes less than 3% of deaths, is managed since unlike flooding the damage is more superficial, I shall contrast this to Earthquakes, which cannot be controlled, however the amount of management that takes place, can reduce its affect massively reducing the amount of death to almost nil. ...read more.

Middle

If a drought is when a country suffers a shortfall in rainfall, than it cannot be controlled, though in Omaha, they have attempted this by cloud seeding, though this has not been proven to work. However, many people refer to drought in the hydrological context which can be controlled, quiet easily, though requiring many resources and so only affecting poorer countries. In the Sahel, 100'000 people died in 1973 due to drought, this drought is a perfect example of bad control as the drought was augmented substantially due to people changing there crops to rain fed agriculture and increasing their crop size due to 'good' rainfall in the 1950's and 1960's. This was not helped by the government who made people grow more cash crops which are rain reliant to earn more money, increasing the amount of rain fed crops, and reducing the amount of nomadic herding which was adapted to uncertain and irregular rainfall. This has been made worse by the fact that 90% of wood is used for firewood increasing the albedo affect of the earth and reducing rainfall further. All these controlling factors help increase the likelihood of drought and famine, and are all controlled by humans. ...read more.

Conclusion

In Los Angeles, to reduce the effects of any Earthquakes all buildings have to be shock resistant meaning they are not affected by resonance in the Earth, allowing the energy to dissipate, out of the building stopping them from cracking or braking. This can greatly improve the chances of survival as the earthquake in Turkey which caused 20'000 deaths, caused so many mainly due to corruption in the government, taking bribes from developers who were not building, government building and normal buildings to Earthquake specifications. Also in Los Angeles they have very good transport links and have fleets of helicopters who can bring aid and help almost immediately, meaning that very few people will die in the aftermath, trapped in buildings and due to disease. So to conclude, there are many ways of controlling, and managing hazards, and if the amount of resources put in is adequate it is possible to reduce the affects of any hazard to almost nil. As in America, even when there is no way, currently in our technological grasp of controlling some hazards, death and destruction can still be kept to a minimum through management. This can be see in poor countries where mismanagement by governments who are trying to make more money, taking a big risk and putting the interest of their people on line, can make hazards worse, having the opposite effect. Michael John Rodriguez from Bow El Toro ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hazardous Environments section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hazardous Environments essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain the increasing frequency of Hydro-meteorological Hazards.

    3 star(s)

    which perhaps would not have been before, such equipment was introduced. This would make it able for more small-scale hazards to be reported, in the more isolated area which people may not be aware of. Another suggestion, linked with that of the increase in development of technology worldwide, is the

  2. To what extent is the human response to hazards affected by variations in the ...

    poor and they where unable to fund ways of reducing the impact of the hazard and protecting its population.

  1. Mount St. Helens - Natural disasters.

    Scientists considered the greatest hazards from an eruption to be flash floods or mudflows, particularly those that might cause Swift Reservoir to overflow. Washington State Department of Transportation established a volcano viewing area near Ridgefield off of Interstate 5 and made plans to secure another viewing site near Centralia-Chehalis.

  2. Using an example, outline the effects of a tsunami and how the hazard can ...

    Due to the positioning of the fault, the strongest tsunamis were directed in an east-west direction meaning Sri Lanka and Indonesia, both in close proximity to the epicentre of the earthquake and directly east and west of the tremor respectively, suffered high casualties and significant damage to infrastructure.

  1. Poor countries are more at risk from natural hazards than rich countries. How far ...

    damage Insured damage of at least US$16.2 million At least 100 people injured At least 20 people killed At least 100 people dead Table 1: What is a "disaster"? The more recent definition by the Swiss Reinsurance Company needed either or both of the consequences to be satisfied.

  2. Suggest why droughts have severe impacts on people and the environment.

    face competition as many others will also be relying on the same thing. In areas, which have suffered the loss of animals due to migration, those who eat meat, such as birds of prey will suffer, as many of the animals, which they would eat such as mice, will have moved elsewhere.

  1. Bangledesh Floods

    and simply raised their beds and furniture to be able to live above the water. When the water reached roof level they would move to higher ground but within easy reach of their homes. In many cases their animals would drown as these areas of high ground were barely big enough to hold the people.

  2. To what extent is the human response to hazards affected by variations in economic ...

    ad been formulated in order to rescue and help the injured or buried. This inevitably lead to more death, as emergency aid was unable to reach those worse affected by the natural hazard. "The historic quarter of Bam has been completely destroyed and many of our countrymen are underneath the ruins," said Mohammad Ali Karimi, the governor of Kerman province.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work