• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent did the Gradual Abandonment of the Maoist Development Paradigm Between the years 1978 and 1988 Improve or Worsen the Lot of the Chinese Peasant?

Extracts from this document...


To What Extent did the Gradual Abandonment of the Maoist Development Paradigm Between the years 1978 and 1988 Improve or Worsen the Lot of the Chinese Peasant? Unlike most modern dictators, Mao Zedong seems to have escaped the posthumous discredit that seems his due. He is still a national hero, and considered the father of the Chinese people. Although his political legacy may have avoided destruction, his economic one has not. Soon after his death, the ascension of Deng Xiaoping caused the beginning of a process that would change China from a large but inefficient nation to a world leader, poised to overtake America as the largest economy on Earth. It is fairly obvious that for the Chinese economy as a whole, the reformist policies of Deng and his successors were good news, but in the great capitalist game there are always losers as well as winners. In this instance the losers may well have been the rural peasants, the people that the party set out to protect. Was the transition from a centrally planned economy for the benefit or the detriment of the rural worker? There are many issues that must be addressed before an examination of the question proper can begin. For a start, it must be shown that the policies of Mao were actually abandoned. According to Diana Hunt, the Maoist Development Paradigm had as its central aim the abolition of all income differentials (you're right she does, but is she correct?), be they between individuals or regions. At the same time he wanted the social ownership of all productive assets to lead to a greater material abundance for the people. He was keen to develop and balance productive forces and productive relations, in the knowledge that it was important not only to have the capital and labourers to produce goods but also the correct relations to manage and integrate them. ...read more.


As mentioned earlier, this should lead to an implicit rise in rural incomes. As is evident from the graph, the gradual rise in rural incomes is roughly matched by that of state food prices. It can therefore safely be assumed that the rising prices of food had a positive impact upon the incomes of peasants. Because the price rises were deliberate, it can once again be said that the policies of Deng improved the situation of the peasant. Despite their huge importance, agricultural prices were not the only issue of significance for determining peasant incomes. Output levels, employment rates in different industries, food to cash crop production ratio, unemployment, as well rural industry all affect peasants' wealth. Between 1978 and 1984 per capita grain output rose by 78kg a year, an index rise of 24%. Cotton production went from 2.3kg to 5.9kg, a rise of 156 %, and meat production went from 9.0kg per person per year, to 14.9kg, a rise of 65.6%!7 When the government abandoned forced grain self sufficiency which had before been imposed on the collectives, more specialisation and diversification was possible. This is the main reason for the increased range of production, and therefore another way in which policy change helped the peasants. Because more diversification was allowed, the proportion of peasants working in agriculture dropped from 90% in 1978 to just 79% in 1988. Transport, building, commerce and industry all expanded greatly as a result of the loosening of laws, and the result was greater consumption production? options for the people. It was not all good news however. The freeing up and dismantling of the communes had the effect of greatly increasing unemployment. In 1978 there were 25,549,000 'surplus' rural workers, compromising 9% of the rural workforce. What does 'surplus' mean in this context? By 1987 this figure had risen to 111,255,000, meaning that 36% of the rural workforce was 'surplus to requirements'.8 One of the effects of this was the urban migration that occurred during this period. ...read more.


of an east coast resident being around 6 times that of a peasant. Communism is no more in China, with repression and human rights abuses the only remnants of an abandoned doctrine. Bibliography: * J. Zink, China's One Child Policy, axe.acadiau.ca/~043638z/one-child/index.html * C. Riskin, China's Political Economy, Oxford, 1991 * Kueh and Ash, Economic Trends in Chinese Agriculture, Oxford, 1993 * P. Nolan, The Political Economy of Collective Farms, Cambridge, 1988 * China SSB, Zhongguo Tonji Nianjan (ZGTJNJ) (Chinese statistical yearbook), 1989 * J. R. Taylor & J. Banister, China: The Problem of Employing Surplus Rural Labour * G. Heilig, Can China Feed Itself, http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/LUC/ChinaFood/index_h.htm * Z.X. Simon & T.S.P. Christopher, Spatial Disparities, Inflation, and their Impact on China's Investment Environment in the 1990s and Beyond, Hong Kong Baptist University * S.G. Powell, Agricultural Reform in China 1978-1990, Manchester, 1992 DEPARTMENT OF HISTORICAL STUDIES PROJECT FEEDBACK SHEET NAME: Joe Inwood TOPIC: Reforms MARK: 70 Very Good ? Satisfactory ? Needs More Attention STRUCTURE AND FOCUS Engagement with question as set ? Clear development of argument Good Sustained analytical approach Good Relevant deployment of evidence Good Effective introduction ? Range of issues covered Good Effective conclusion ? QUALITY OF ARGUMENT/EXPRESSION Clarity and fluency of writing ? Use of vocabulary and grammar ? Appropriate use of quotations ? Acknowledgement of sources Good Use of relevant analytical concepts ? Awareness/use of historian's ideas ? Independence of thought Good Ability to reflect on/interpret the past ? Presentation ? Length ? RANGE OF KNOWLEDGE Range of reading and knowledge ? Sense of historical development ? Integration of general/detail ? Use of IT (Excel, Access etc) ? Use of IT (Internet etc) ? COMMENTS A thoughtful, perceptive and carefully put together Project. You develop your theme quite effectively. I think you underestimate the effect of the rise of rural industry on peasant incomes (at least after the initial rise in agricultural prices). You also need to take account of the effect of various subsidies to the urban population. On the whole though, a good Project. There is no evidence that you have used any web-based material. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Population & Settlement section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Population & Settlement essays

  1. Geography revision - flooding - Urbanisation - Population problems

    shops specialise in ethnic foods, DIY shops along main roads going into the centre, where there were previously factories or terraced housing sites. Edges of Urban Areas- Major developments on cheap, unused land outside the city, there are also bigger stores with more variety.

  2. The rural aftermath - The effects of the plagues.

    In rural Germany over a quarter of the places which had been inhabited in 1300 were extinct by the end of the fifteenth century. These lands were abandoned not because the population had been killed off by the Black Death but because those who survived chose to leave them in

  1. Population policies

    Others believe this figure is greatly exaggerated and that the true impact is closer to 50-60 million. The one-child policy promotes couples having only one child in rural and urban areas. This limit is strongly enforced; couples who violate this policy are required to pay large fines and are denied bonuses at their workplace.


    In addition, after each year it decreases by 100 000 due to in-river harvesting. Let PO be the initial population. Let PT be the population at T years. P1 = PO (0.92) - 100 000 P2 = P1 (0.92) - 100 000 = [PO (0.92)

  1. Explain why urban-industrialization in China during the central planning period deprived the rural sector.

    Urban bias promotes a better standard of living in the cities relative to the countryside. In 1950 officially defined 'poor peasants' accounted for 52% of the population, yet they only owned 14% of the land, whereas the landlords and 'rich peasants' who accounted for just 9% of the population had

  2. World Development

    This is a graph to show the levels of development for various countries. It shows how the MEDC'S and 1st world countries are more developed. It also indicates the standards of varied countries (i.e. 2nd world and 3rd world). There are six basic needs which differ between the MEDC'S and the LEDC'S.

  1. Discover whether there is a hierarchy in Leicestershire.

    The reason that there is only one, is because the only reason that people would use this is in the case that an entire work place needs these low order goods, such as tea bags, also there are no houses in the CBD and so there is not a high demand for these products.

  2. China's One Child Policy - Success or Failure?

    Despite this, the government does offer $6 to poor rural elderly with one child, although it can hardly be considered much help or a substitute for the support of more children. As well as this, over 60s have been reassured of extra provisions they may be able to receive, however

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work