• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the causes of mass movement hazards depend more on human than on physical factors?

Free essay example:

To what extent do the causes of mass movement hazards depend more on human than on physical factors?

Both human and physical factors can cause mass movement. Mass movement is the movement down slope of any weathered material (regolith) under the influence of gravity. There are three types of movement; fall, slide and flow. They can be classified according to; speed of movement, type of movement, and amount of moisture present.

There are 6 different types of flow – mudflow, slow earth flow, rapid earth flow, debris flow, rock avalanche and snow avalanche. Mudflows are common on steep unvegetated slopes (clay). Earthflows, (both slow and rapid) contain less water and therefore move slower. Debris flow is much like a debris avalanche, (rapid movement of rock/debris) but with more water. Rock and snow avalanches are the catastrophic movement of snow or rocks.

The actual movement itself can be influenced by both human and physical factors;

  • Amount and type of vegetation – Less vegetation means the land is prone to damage. More vegetation, such as trees and bushes means that they can intercept and help prevent the land from damage. Also, roots from the vegetation make the soil stronger as they bind the soil.
  • Degree of weathering and erosion – Higher amounts of weathering and erosion leads to the actual movement more likely to happen-there is more material available to move. Processes such as frost shattering, wetting & drying and heating & cooling loosen the soil. Removal of material from the base of the slope by marine or fluvial erosion destabilises the slope.
  • Amount of moisture present – If the land is heavily saturated, the material is loosened and therefore more likely to collapse.
  • Human activity – Recreational/leisure activities (walking, golf courses etc) and farming all damage the slope and weaken it. Road, railway and housing construction.
  • Type and structure of rock – Weaker rocks are more liable to collapse, whereas harder rocks retain their structure. Porous rocks allow water into the rock therefore weakening it, whereas impermeable rocks do not.
  • Slope angle – Higher slopes mean quicker/more rapid movement.
  • Climate – More rain leads to heavier saturation, more weathering/erosion equals quicker rates of mass movement. Slopes will become weaker quicker.

Triggers of mass movement can also be both physical and human.

  • PHYSICAL – Earthquakes, volcanoes, heavy rain, snow melt, gravity
  • HUMAN – Modification of land, (e.g. urbanisation, building) mining, machinery use, deforestation,      extraction of resources

Physical factors

Causes of mass movement – The most important physical factors that determine movement are gravity, slope angle and pore pressure.

However, natural hazards such as volcanoes and earthquakes exceed the strength of the rock, making it difficult for the slope to retain its structure. Slopes can fail during earthquakes and cause major damage to structures and facilities as well as people. An example of this is the Huascaran Avalanche triggered by the Peru earthquake in 1970. An offshore earthquake in the Pacific Ocean (7.7 on the Richter scale) triggered rock and snow avalanches on Nevado Huascaran. The movement began as a rock fall, but soon transformed into a debris avalanche and then a debris flow, about 100 million cubic metres of material. The overall vertical drop was approximately 4000 metres and travelled 16km laterally. The debris buried the town of Yungay, killing 18,000 people.

Other physical factors, such as heavy rainfall, can also lead to slope instability and thus failure. If there is a prolonged period or heavy rainfall, the slope becomes heavily saturated. The water infiltrates and percolates into the slope, making it weaker.  Snow melt works in the same way.

Normal everyday processes such as gravity can also lead to slope failure. Gravity has two effects; it acts to move the material down slope (slide component) and it acts to stick the particle to the slope (stick component). The down slope movement is proportional to the weight of the particle and the slope angle.  Water lubricated particles, and, in some cases, fills the spaces between the particles. This forces them apart under pressure. Pore pressure will greatly increase the ability of the material to move. This factor is particularly important in movements of wet material on low angle slopes. image01.jpg

Other factors which affect the slope’s strength and stability are the inputs, outputs and processes which occur in a slope system. All these things have both positive and negative effects on the slope.

Human Factors

It appears that human factors are somewhat more damaging to slopes, but do not harm as quickly as physical factors. For example, on slopes where recreational activities occur, such as walking and climbing on mountains, damage the slope over a long period of time, and the damage gradually gets worse. Farming the land also damages the land and destabilises the slope as the ground is constantly being tampered with. Grazing also means the land is more prone to damage.

Other human influences such as urbanisation can completely destroy the slope’s structure. In LEDC cities such as Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, the city often has little room to accommodate the population. The city and its population begins to spread out, and the low income residents are forced to build on the only available land, usually on steep slopes.  

Mining can also have a severe effect on the internal structure of the slope. Continuous mining can eventually destabilise the slope and force it to collapse. This is also similar when extracting resources.

Other human influences include; deforestation, which means there are no roots to bind the soil/earth together,

In some cases, human factors can actually re-stabilise a slope. For example, the replanting of trees, or afforestation, can stabilise the slope. The roots from the trees will bind the soil, making it harder to collapse.

Other ways in which human influences can help prevent slope failure are;

  • Avoid building structures on the slopes (but some may deter this advice and continue to build)
  • Improve slope drainage (reduce the impact of the water)
  • Attach the slope material to the bedrock with physical restraints – this can include things such as chicken wire or cement, or bolting rock panels to the underlying bedrock. image02.png

Efforts have also been made to prevent mass wasting by supporting the base of the slope to prevent it from failing. Wire boxes are often used for these purposes.

One of the worst disasters of the 20th Century occurred in the Piave valley in north east Italy, in 1963. A debris slide with a volume of 240 cubic metres fell into the reservoir behind the Vaiont Dam. The damn was completed in 1960 after 4 years work, during which time concern was expressed that debris slides were possible as the accumulating image00.png

water created instability in the adjacent bedrock. A slide of 700 000 cubic metres

occurred in November 1960. Concrete injections were made in an attempt to strengthen the bedrock.

However, in 1963 a major slide occurred.  A 100m wave over topped the dam, killing 3000 people. Several factors contributed to the Vaiont disaster. The rocks making up the wall of the reservoir dipped down into the Vaoint valley, which facilitated movement under gravity. Alternating bands of limestone and clay allowed water to build up between permeable and impermeable layers, lubricating the sliding process. A number of fractures also increased the risk of movement. As the reservoir was filled, rocks near the edge were saturated and positive pore pressure increased.

The disaster could have been prevented if the slopes had been drained and the foot of the slope was stabilised. Small slides had previously occurred, and the history of the slides does not appear to have been taken into account when the dam and reservoir were originally planned.

The Vaoint Dam is a good example of how human influences outweighed the physical influences when causing a mass movement hazard.  However, it is contradictory in the way that a positive human influence turned into a negative one.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hazardous Environments section.

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related AS and A Level Geography Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related AS and A Level Hazardous Environments essays

  1. "What are the physical processes that cause geomorphic hazards? What problems do they cause ...

    For example, rain on new snow almost instantly causes avalanches. Strong sun or warm temperatures can also cause rapid melting of the snow and creates wet avalanches. Rock and snow avalanche, Mount Huascaran, Peru. In 1970, a rock and snow avalanche caused by an earthquake on Mt.

  2. Tsunami - 26/12/04 - Causes, impact, and management

    begins to withdraw on its self as is slow down leaving the seabed bare then a surge of waves advance on to the coast.

  1. comparing shrewsbury an old town an telfrd a purpose build new town

    The Pride Hill street scores were; 5, 4.5, 3, 3, 5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 4. The High street scores were; 4, 2, 3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 4, 5. This gave an average of 4 for Accessibility, 3.5 for Position of main shops, 3 for Cleanliness of town,

  2. b) What are i) the prime causes of and ii) the most effective remedies for ...

    The lack of vegetation also means that there is more evaporation due to reduced shade which draws the minerals and salts to the surface, increasing salinity and hence making it harder for plants to recover and grow there unless they are adapted to handle high levels of salt.

  1. To what extent is magnitude the main factor to influence the type and level ...

    An example of this could be seen when a volcano in Iceland erupted in April 2010. The following eruption, interacted with the weather conditions at the time pushed a huge cloud of ash east over Britain and Europe which delayed flights in and out of Europe for as long as 11 days forcing 20 countries to close their airspace.

  2. California and the Phillippines - Hazard Hotspots and Human Management of Risks

    Meteorologists say that it takes about 10 inches of rain in a season to loosen the hillsides enough to create the risk of landslides. Once that benchmark has been hit, a brief but intense rainfall ? say, 2 inches in 6 hours at lower elevations, or 4 inches over the

  1. Volcanic and seismic events are major pieces of evidence towards proving that plate-tectonics theory ...

    Results from the Deep-Sea Drilling Project (see Chapter 12) conï¬rmed the interpretations made from earlier paleomagnetic studies. Cores of deep-sea sediments and seismic proï¬les obtained by the Glomar Challenger and other research vessels have provided much of the data that support the seaï¬oor spreading theory. According to this theory, oceanic crust is continuously forming at mid-oceanic ridges, moves away

  2. The extent to which volcanoes represent a hazard to human populations depends on where ...

    In some ways I agree with the title, in simple terms the closer your proximity to a volcano the greater a hazard it becomes. However, you could be the same distance from a volcano at a Destructive margin and the same distance from a volcano at a Constructive margin but the hazard would be very different.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work