• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the sources agree that Russian Government Policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it both under Tsarist and Communist rule?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question A - Study Sources 1-6 and answer the question: To what extent do the sources agree that Russian Government Policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it both under Tsarist and Communist rule? The definition of a peasant remains the same throughout the period studied; 'A peasant is a person who permanantly lives and works on the land'. The peasants resistance was either a physical or mental movement where they opposed and refused to comply with new agricultural reforms passed. The initial impressions gathered from sources one to six is that consistant failure of agricultural policy is dominant throughout, yet peasants resistance is not so easy to detect. The period covered by the sources, begin and end with consistant agriculture failure. Sources 4, 5 and 6 show consistant policy failure during the communist rule of Khrushchev. Source 6 written by Alex Nove describes 'the picture as a whole was very disappointing', this description agrees with the account given in source 4 that the Virgin Lands Scheme was 'Poorly organised, with stupid decisions and ill-concevied strategies',therefore supporting consistant failure. Source 6 disagrees with source 4 as Nove believed that the failure of the Virgin Lands Scheme was due to Krushchev inheritance of a generation of 'neglect and impoverishment'. ...read more.

Middle

Source 5 shows limited evidence of peasants resistance towards Krushchev agricultural reforms. Alexander II was the First Tsar leader in the period studied. In source 1, Ronald Hingley supports Alexander II success 'the emperors achievement is one of momentous moral and symbolic significance', Peter Oxley agrees that Alexander was the 'Tsar Liberator'. However, Hingley predominantly supports the failure of the emancipation, 'most of the liberated serfs resented recieveing too little land for their needs', 'Nor the freedom granted to them was by any means complete, after 1861 individual peasants remained bound in various ways to their village communes', this shows peasants resistance and failure of reforms. Hingley describes the positive aspects 'peasants were freed and were granted a size of allotment'. However there were still limitations and peasants had a negative attitude towards the policies due to the taxes they had to pay as they 'remained subject to legal discrimination'. Source 1 implies slight support from the peasants yet shows great resistance. Sources 5, 4 and 1 support the failure of the agricultural reforms but do provide some support for the various new policies, also Sources 1 and 6 are similar due to the peasants initial enthusiasm for the new agricultural reforms. ...read more.

Conclusion

This source contradicts source 6 as Nove believed that it was due to Stalin that Krushchev policies were failures, yet source 3 implies his success 'we have improved the quality of grain beyond all measure'. The reliablity of Source 3 is questionable due to Stalins desire to impress Churchill and attempt to gain appreciation of his policy of collectivisation. In conclusion sources 1 to 6 all help us to create a greater understanding of Russia during the Tsar and Communist leadership. The peasants resistance continued to be a predominant problem for all rulers when attempting to enforce new agricultural ideology, however the sources only support the question to a slight extent due to lack of evidence. The main factor of the failure of the agricultural reforms was the inability of the rulers to meet the peasants needs and compromise with them to realise their contribution to the success of their plans. All of the sources show consistant failure, however the extent of the failure depends on each source, and the sources show higher incidents of agricultural failure rather than peasants resistance. Although all of the sources are helpfull, their reliability is limited and therefore more sources must be analysed to discover the extent of the peasants resistance and the agricultural failures. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Production - Location & Change section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Production - Location & Change essays

  1. The Role and Importance of Agriculture In the Carribean. Organisations involved in its ...

    They also provide technical assistance for many of these projects. INTRODUCTION TO SOIL SCIENCE Functions of Soil in our Environment. * Habitat for organisms; Microbes, earth worms, rodents * Medium for plant growth; Provide essential minerals and water. * Important component in the water cycle ; storages in pores and evaporation * Engineering medium; construction of roads and building etc.

  2. Why did Mao begin the great leap forward in 1958?

    Communes were expected to give to the great leap forward in small as well as the big projects. Small commune factories were set up to make all kinds of industrial products such as cement, ball bearings and chemical fertiliser. Particular significance was placed on the making of steel, so 600,000

  1. Communist Russia under Stalin, 1928 - 1939.

    Such a system discouraged individual initiative. For instance a factory manager received his instructions (commands) and simply carried them out. The state or government controlled the resources it needed to achieve the economic targets. Factories, mines, transports and farms were owned by the state.

  2. Major innovations in agriculture have always proved to be controversial. With reference to recent ...

    To certain extent, innovations in agriculture such as the Green Revolution and the Common Agricultural policy have proved to be commercially and socially successful at first but they are not commercially and socially sustainable and definitely not environmentally sustainable. For instance, the Green Revolution helped to increase yields and production but increase the burden on farmers for purchasing HYVs seeds.

  1. How successful was Stalin's attempt to industrialise the Soviet Union?

    However, official figures are not taken seriously by most historians outside the USSR because some of them were simply made up to impress authorities or some of the output was of extremely poor quality as the factories bought cheap raw materials and hurriedly produced to meet the targets.

  2. Explaining Failure.

    over 25 year by approximately 62%. This is considerable! The article states that Sub - Saharan countries have been facing with the following problems/disadvantages; physical geography and resources, weather conditions, economic policy, demography and government corruption. Physical geography has been an important factor, in several ways.

  1. Jethro Tull made the Greatest Contribution to Agricultural Change in the Eighteenth Century. Do ...

    So I don't think he made the greatest contribution to change. Lord Townshend was born in 1674 and died in 1738. During this time he invented the four-course crop rotation, the affects of this made a great contribution to the change in agriculture in the eighteenth century.

  2. To what extent did the 'collective' farms of Eastern Europe work?

    On latter inspections the strategy that Kadar implemented seems full proof. Even if the middle peasants refused to join governmental orientated cooperatives, they were encouraged to form their own, which many evidently did. The outcome of Kadar's reformed collectivisation policy was astounding.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work