• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and Communist rule?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and Communist rule? Source 1 acknowledges that the emancipation 'conferred freedom on many millions of men, women and children'. Serfdom had prevented the industrial growth and introduction of modern agricultural methods. The abolition of Serfdom was in their mind the only method of preventing a peasant's revolt. Source 1 however states that the majority of peasants were still 'bound to their village communes' after the emancipation, emphasising the failure of land policies that had been set up after the end of Serfdom. Source 1 states the peasants did resist because they felt that the policies did not suite their needs and because they had to pay money for their land, it can be argued that this demonstrates that the policies were a failure because they were designed so that the peasants could not afford the repayments anyway. The source also contains a negative tone with verbs such as 'resented' and 'resisted'. The peasant's resistance was aroused during the emancipation due to unpopularity of the policies. This is mentioned in Source 1 and Source 2. ...read more.


Sergei Semenov concludes in Source 2 that a 'bright new future lies ahead of the peasants'. Collectivisation began the real decline for peasantry. Stalin in Source 3 describes the collective farm policy as a 'terrible struggle' but affirms that it was 'absolutely necessary for Russia'. This was only 'necessary' because policies including Lenin's NEP had previously failed. Collectivisation was regarded as a failure, as was the agricultural productivity which made no obvious change despite Stalin's claims in Source 3 that they had 'vastly increased the food supply' and 'improved quality beyond all measures'. Stalin clearly blames the peasants for the problems with collective farming, 'tractors were spoiled in a few months' this is consistent with Edward Shevardnadze's account in Source 4 of the Virgin Lands Scheme 'we watched helplessly as equipment brought began to break down' however he does not place the blame with the peasants but on the policies that failed and the bad planning and decisions that were made. The integrity of the source is somewhat questioned in two ways. Source 4 was written after the fall of communism in 1991 when many changes were currently taking place, and the Source may have been an attempt to blame the government who made the decisions instead of the communists ideology which he may want to protect. ...read more.


Source 6 also claims the agricultural problems under Khrushchev were 'inherited' by Stalin. This evidence is consistent with the idea that government agricultural policy under Tsarist and Communist rule was a consistent failure. Examining Source 3 and 4 this assumption is verified. In Source 3 Stalin struggles to justify his methods on collective farming while Shevardnadse in Source 4 recalls Krushchev's drive to develop the 'country's virgin lands and forests' and the many difficulties that he faced. In Conclusion it can be argued that Stalin's policies on forced collectivisation resulted in fierce peasant's resistance and led to a disruption in agricultural productivity and famine similarly to late tsarist Russia. The end result was that peasant's households had been collectivised and private land ownership eliminated but it had helped Stalin's goal of rapid industrialisation. This bares strong similarities to Tsarist policies on agriculture examined in the sources. The Tsars, by using serfdom, prevented a large empire from breaking up. However, social and political unrest and the many unpopular policies introduced by the government that did not benefit the peasants eventually led to large scale peasant's resistance and ultimately ended tsarist rule. ?? ?? ?? ?? Russia Coursework Assignment Irrum Khan 972 - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Production - Location & Change section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Production - Location & Change essays

  1. The Role and Importance of Agriculture In the Carribean. Organisations involved in its ...

    Soil Formation Soil Composition Soil formation is slow process. In the best conditions 1mm of soil may be form in a year. However, under poor condition it may take thousands of years for the same quantity of soil to form.

  2. The Relationships Between Human Health and Agriculture

    After the initial enthusiasm following the success of increased use of fertilizers and pesticides during the Green Revolution, internationally accepted quality standards have been set up in attempt to minimize health hazards of pesticide use, such as the WHO Pesticide Evaluation Scheme (WHOPES).

  1. Major innovations in agriculture have always proved to be controversial. With reference to recent ...

    The increasing demand for organic goods has led to the growth of organic farming in many parts of the world especially in MEDCs. Organic farming can be considered as a method of sustainable farming as produces food but also conserves the environment as it excludes the use of chemicals but

  2. To what extent do the sources agree that Russian Government Policy on agriculture consistently ...

    Source 4 is not applicable when debating peasants resistance as it describes the movements of the youth communists in Russia. The source was written in 1991 with the knowledge of the disgrace many felt towards the leader, which limits its reliability as during 1954-58, without this knowledge he may have supported the leader.

  1. To what extent did the 'collective' farms of Eastern Europe work?

    After taking the theoretical aspect into account, the statistical information sheds new light. If one is to examine the growth of agricultural output rates during the period it is apparent that Polish agriculture was experiencing an affluent phase. It experienced the highest growth rate of all the Eastern European

  2. To what extent do the sources agree that the Russian government's policy on agriculture ...

    Source 3 collected in 1940-45 during the communist rule points out agricultural failure as there is evidence of the elimination of Kulaks "the great bulk where wiped out". There is also evidence of some destruction of tractors by peasants and has great difficulty explaining it to them.

  1. How successful was Stalin's attempt to industrialise the Soviet Union?

    Success was certainly present in the development of heavy industries, although the rate could have been easily faster. As heavy industries grew rapidly, consumer goods were ignored in the First Five Year Plan. Textile production actually declined during the FFYP largely due to the collapse in livestock numbers and the

  2. Communist Russia under Stalin, 1928 - 1939.

    A truly Socialist society was a classless one. Thus rapid industrialisation would transform the USSR into a Communist or Socialist country. During this period Russia's economy was completely transformed. It became a Communist economy. This meant that the state rigidly controlled and planned all economic activity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work