• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and Communist rule?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and Communist rule? Source 1 acknowledges that the emancipation 'conferred freedom on many millions of men, women and children'. Serfdom had prevented the industrial growth and introduction of modern agricultural methods. The abolition of Serfdom was in their mind the only method of preventing a peasant's revolt. Source 1 however states that the majority of peasants were still 'bound to their village communes' after the emancipation, emphasising the failure of land policies that had been set up after the end of Serfdom. Source 1 states the peasants did resist because they felt that the policies did not suite their needs and because they had to pay money for their land, it can be argued that this demonstrates that the policies were a failure because they were designed so that the peasants could not afford the repayments anyway. The source also contains a negative tone with verbs such as 'resented' and 'resisted'. The peasant's resistance was aroused during the emancipation due to unpopularity of the policies. This is mentioned in Source 1 and Source 2. ...read more.


Sergei Semenov concludes in Source 2 that a 'bright new future lies ahead of the peasants'. Collectivisation began the real decline for peasantry. Stalin in Source 3 describes the collective farm policy as a 'terrible struggle' but affirms that it was 'absolutely necessary for Russia'. This was only 'necessary' because policies including Lenin's NEP had previously failed. Collectivisation was regarded as a failure, as was the agricultural productivity which made no obvious change despite Stalin's claims in Source 3 that they had 'vastly increased the food supply' and 'improved quality beyond all measures'. Stalin clearly blames the peasants for the problems with collective farming, 'tractors were spoiled in a few months' this is consistent with Edward Shevardnadze's account in Source 4 of the Virgin Lands Scheme 'we watched helplessly as equipment brought began to break down' however he does not place the blame with the peasants but on the policies that failed and the bad planning and decisions that were made. The integrity of the source is somewhat questioned in two ways. Source 4 was written after the fall of communism in 1991 when many changes were currently taking place, and the Source may have been an attempt to blame the government who made the decisions instead of the communists ideology which he may want to protect. ...read more.


Source 6 also claims the agricultural problems under Khrushchev were 'inherited' by Stalin. This evidence is consistent with the idea that government agricultural policy under Tsarist and Communist rule was a consistent failure. Examining Source 3 and 4 this assumption is verified. In Source 3 Stalin struggles to justify his methods on collective farming while Shevardnadse in Source 4 recalls Krushchev's drive to develop the 'country's virgin lands and forests' and the many difficulties that he faced. In Conclusion it can be argued that Stalin's policies on forced collectivisation resulted in fierce peasant's resistance and led to a disruption in agricultural productivity and famine similarly to late tsarist Russia. The end result was that peasant's households had been collectivised and private land ownership eliminated but it had helped Stalin's goal of rapid industrialisation. This bares strong similarities to Tsarist policies on agriculture examined in the sources. The Tsars, by using serfdom, prevented a large empire from breaking up. However, social and political unrest and the many unpopular policies introduced by the government that did not benefit the peasants eventually led to large scale peasant's resistance and ultimately ended tsarist rule. ?? ?? ?? ?? Russia Coursework Assignment Irrum Khan 972 - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Production - Location & Change section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Production - Location & Change essays

  1. The Role and Importance of Agriculture In the Carribean. Organisations involved in its ...

    Soil Formation Soil Composition Soil formation is slow process. In the best conditions 1mm of soil may be form in a year. However, under poor condition it may take thousands of years for the same quantity of soil to form.

  2. Communist Russia under Stalin, 1928 - 1939.

    There were three Five Year Plans. These set targets or goals that industries and agriculture had to achieve. In practice the emphasis was on over-fulfilling - achieving more than the set targets, rather than only meeting them. Such a system discouraged individual initiative.

  1. To what extent did the 'collective' farms of Eastern Europe work?

    Throughput the period in question the hostile regulatory framework that the Polish government set out meant that their collectivisation strategy was fundamentally flawed. Aldcroft furthers the issue by declaring that it created, "An odour of mistrust and uncertainty between peasants and government bureaucrats which had a negative effect on efficiency."

  2. Major innovations in agriculture have always proved to be controversial. With reference to recent ...

    The food surplus led to dumping of food products in LEDCs which create negative effects for farmers and create problems in the food market. In response to this, the CAP was reformed by breaking the link between subsides and level of production to encourage farmers to produce in response to real demand rather than for the subsidies available.

  1. To what extent do the sources agree that Russian Government Policy on agriculture consistently ...

    Source 4 is not applicable when debating peasants resistance as it describes the movements of the youth communists in Russia. The source was written in 1991 with the knowledge of the disgrace many felt towards the leader, which limits its reliability as during 1954-58, without this knowledge he may have supported the leader.

  2. "Can the theories that Alfred D. Chandler developed in his book 'Scale and Scope: ...

    As said before, Chandler's theories still seems to be applicable to these industries today and thus probably also in the future. Consequently, one might expect to be those of these industries that offer the largest potential for economies of scale to be dominated by few first-movers that are quick to make the three (four)

  1. How successful was Stalin's attempt to industrialise the Soviet Union?

    On the whole, historians have criticised chaotic planning and implementation for somewhat halting the development of heavy industries in the USSR. Oil production was actually very slow-11.7m in 1928 to 28.5m in 1937 compared to the textile industries where production rose from 2700m to 4000m in 1940.

  2. The Relationships Between Human Health and Agriculture

    Low fruit and vegetable intake also affects one's risks of being affected by Non Communicable Diseases (NCDs), such as weakened immune systems, type 2 diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular diseases and various cancers. The total world population has grown from just under 2 billion to about 6.2 billion in a mere century6.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work