• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23

'To what extent does the River Lyn conform to the Bradshaw model of River characteristics?'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction. Aims of investigation + my key questions. The aim of my investigation is to see 'To what extent does the River Lyn conform to the Bradshaw model of River characteristics?' To help me answer this main question I have split it up into key questions. They are: 1. Does the size and speed of the River increase going downstream? And therefore does the discharge increase as you go downstream? 2. Does the gradient decrease as you go downstream? 3. Does the load particle size decrease as you go downstream? Background information. The River Lyn has two channels which meet about two thirds along the River Lyn, and carry on as one until it reaches the Bristol Channel at Lynmouth. They join at Watersmeet, and from Watersmeet to the mouth the length of the River Lyn is 2.5 miles and drops 110 metres. The gradient can be up to 1 in 63 at some parts of the River Lyn. Canoeing takes place November to February (on a restricted scale), and at other times fishing is allowed. The East and West Lyn rivers once flowed parallel to the coast eroding 660 ft deeply into the plateau, where it entered the sea at Lee Bay. With the breaching of the valley sides the East and West Lyn rivers cascaded to the shore at Lynmouth, and now there is a fossil filled Riverbed high above the active river. On the 15th August 1952 there was a huge flood, there was high rainfall levels and all the water in the Exmoor catchment went into the River. Above Lynmouth the catchment area of a total 39.2 square miles are of gentle sloping and flat toped moors. Large boulders and rocks were carried in the flow towards Lynmouth destroying houses, roads and bridges. Many lost their lives during the flood. Changes have been made nearer the mouth of the River Lyn due to this. ...read more.

Middle

0.740 m/s Cross sectional area (m2) Average width (m) x average depth (m) (then converted to m by multiplying by 4 and dividing by 10,000) 1 (19 x 4) � 10,000 0.008 m2 Average width (m) x average depth (m) (then converted to m by multiplying by 4 and dividing by 10,000) 2 (409 x 4) � 10,000 0.164m2 Average width (m) x average depth (m) (then converted to m by multiplying by 25 and dividing by 10,000) 3 (421 x 25) � 10,000 1.050m2 Hydraulic radius. Cross sectional area (m2) � wetted perimeter (m) 1 0.008 � 0.460 0.017 Cross sectional area (m2) � wetted perimeter (m) 2 0.1636 x 2.40 0.393 Cross sectional area (m2) � wetted perimeter (m) 3 1.050 x 9.750 10.238 Discharge. (m3/s) Velocity (m/s) x cross sectional area (m2) 1 0.198 x 0.008 0.002 m3/s Velocity (m/s) x cross sectional area (m2) 2 0.242 x 0.164 0.040m3/s Velocity (m/s) x cross sectional area (m2) 3 0.740 x 1.050 0.777m3/s Analysing the cross sectional diagrams. Site 1. The banks of site one look steep. The water depth is about 6cm, and the water width is about 17cm. The cross sectional area is about 0.008m2. The wetted perimeter is 0.46m. Site 2. The banks in contact with the water are steep, then on the right hand side the bank gradually flattens out, whereas on the left hand side, it stays quite steep. This could be for a variety of reasons, including because there is a meander, so the outermost side would have been eroded away, there is also a path to the river, maybe from animals drinking water, which could have made the River flatter on one side then the other. The water depth is about 22cm, and the width is about 92cm. The cross sectional area is 0.1636m2. The wetted perimeter is 2.4m. Site 3. The banks in contact with the water are quite flat, so therefore the River is quite shallow, it is only about 21cm in depth, but about 4m62cm wide. ...read more.

Conclusion

* The graphs were very helpful and helped create a visual picture of the trends as you move down the River Lyn. * All key questions were answered at the end so this is a good achievement. Weaknesses * There weren't many maps to draw a map of the River Lyn and its surrounding area from. * There was lots of information needed in the method about each of the measurements I would be collecting data on, so this made the word count considerably higher. * The statistical test to see if there is a relationship between velocity and distance downstream didn't really work very well because I didn't have enough readings from along the River Lyn. * There weren't many Internet sites to obtain secondary data about the River Lyn. Opportunities * If I did this experiment again I would use appropriate equipment to find out the load quantity. * If I did this experiment again I would use appropriate equipment to find out the channel bed roughness. * If I did this experiment again I would take readings at more sites along the River Lyn. Threats * There are obstacles along the River Lyn like there has been flood protection downstream because of the 1952 flood, so this could affect the readings. (See the picture below.) * The weather could make the level of the River rise, fall or even freeze which could affect the River and the results. Fig. 31 Overall. The River Lyn does follow the Bradshaw model of River characteristics very well, apart from the load particle size, which the form of data collection I used was not very accurate. Load quantity and channel bed roughness were not researched, and there was no secondary data suitable for using. Overall the whole enquiry went very well and I am very proud of what I've achieved. I was able to answer all the key questions and nearly answer the question, 'to what extent does the River Lyn conform to the Bradshaw model of River characteristics? Page of . ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology essays

  1. How does the Efficiency and Cross-Sectional Area of a River Change Down Stream?

    By looking at the cross-sectional area I can see how large the river becomes further down stream; however in some areas like at site 4, there is a sudden change. This could be due to human impact changing the river shape.

  2. Edexcel Geography B Unit 3 Coursework

    The correlation fairly followed the Bradshaw Model. 4. There is a significant relationship between velocity and hydraulic radius downstream across the River Holford. - The relationship between these two variables was moderately strong and I believe that there is a link between the two.

  1. Investigating the river Caerfanell

    This increases the accuracy of my results, as they are not bias whilst trying to represent the whole river. Also by choosing 3 different areas, I will be able to analysis the different processes and features that a river can present downstream therefore gathering a background of the rivers history.

  2. My hypotheses are:The character of the course of the River Bollin will change along ...

    had heated up the air, there was little wind, and the water felt physically warmer. After collecting all the information, we began the long journey home. When we returned home we had the large task of compiling the data to structure the coursework you see before you.

  1. Study the downstream changes of Loughton Brook.

    * As stream order increases wetted perimeter will increase. The wetted perimeter would evidently increase due to the large influx of water resulting in a large overflow. * As stream order increases discharge will increase. Due to the growing amount of water the discharge would be greater as the water also increases in speed.

  2. An investigation into changes in channel parameters down the river Horner

    Depth I am measuring the depth to get an average depth of the river at each site. Using the average depth I can calculate the cross sectional area. And also produce cross section diagrams. I will measure the depth of the river at five evenly spread places across the river.

  1. Does the river Alyn follow Bradshaw's model?

    Another factor that causes discharge to increase downstream is an increase in surface run-off. In the lower part of the profile there are normally more buildings and less vegetation than in the upper part. This means there is less interception from trees and more impermeable surfaces the further you go downstream.

  2. Do the Characteristics of a river change downstream?

    Surrounding the area where we will be working is mostly moorland. The climate at Backstone Beck is likely to be more varied than that in the valley because the valley sides do not shelter it. There should be more precipitation in general.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work