• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is magnitude the main factor to influence the type and level of challenge posed by tectonic hazards?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To what extent is magnitude the main factor to influence the type and level of challenge posed by tectonic hazards? Introduction Garret Nagle in 1998 defined a tectonic hazard as ?A perceived natural event in the environment which poses a threat to human life and property?. Also adding to this we have a definition of a Natural hazard as ?an event or process that has the potential to cause damage to people and their settlements? (Ross, 1998). These two definitions infer that in order for a tectonic process to become a hazard it should happen in proximity of human beings or have a direct impact on them. Following on from this Em-Dat states that in order for a hazard to turn into a disaster it has to meet at least one of these criteria: 10+ people killed, 100+ affected, State of emergency declared or International assistance called for. The aim of this report will be to analyse the effects that Magnitude has on a tectonic event and if it is the most influential in determining the impact of the event. I will do this by analysing relevant case studies where magnitude seemed to play influential role and weather it was the main factor in the disaster. The two case studies that seem to stand out are Japan 2011 and Haiti 2010 as both where hit with different magnitude earthquakes but the impact it had varied considerably. In determining if magnitude is really the main factor I will examine a range of factors that play a role in these events and thereby, examine the legitimacy of this statement. ...read more.

Middle

It could be the case where a country is so poor that it simply cannot afford to maintain or start up hazard management or defence schemes as it would mean taking funds away from things that are perceived as important by the public such as: Healthcare. A perfect example of this could be seen in Haiti, January 2010. Where a 6.9 magnitude earthquake struck the capital city of Port-au-Prince. Haiti is seen as one of the poorest countries on the western side of the hemisphere, with 80% of the country?s population living below the poverty line. It has no natural resources and is largely dependent on agricultural farming. Also there is a major lack of emergency services with there being no military or air force. Due, to such severe conditions people are forced to build their homes on marginal land and on top of other people?s homes creating large shanty towns (BBC, 2010). They are also not able to keep to any building regulations due to a lack of resources and funding their homes are extremely venerable to any hazard. But, people are almost forced to live in such conditions as they have no other option. When the earthquake struck and although it?s a relatively lower magnitude than the one in Japan, its impacts are hardly comparable. With a death toll of over 316,000 and a further 300,000 injured due to collapsing buildings such as the hospital which left any aid available almost obsolete (Em-Dat, 2010). ...read more.

Conclusion

Conclusion To conclude, I believe the overall statement that magnitude is the most influential factor in influencing the level of challenge posed by tectonic events is true in some aspects. As it is needed for any tectonic event to actually become a hazard as in order for it poses any threat to human life it must have the energy to do so. This can be clearly seen in the case study of Japan 2011, where even though the country seemed appropriately prepared for such a hazard the sheer size of the event bypassed any defences. Whereas, if it was a lower scale event it would not have caused so much damage. However, I don?t believe that magnitude in itself is the most influential factor. Although, it is needed in the process I believe that in each individual case a mix of factors is used to determine the level of challenge. For example, in Haiti where the magnitude was not really an important factor in the outcome and most influential factor was actually Level of development. To sum up, I believe that Magnitude is an influential factor but no factor by itself is the most influential and that a mixture of factors add up to determine the level of challenge posed by a tectonic event. Are you suggesting that the combination of factors might actually vary depending on where the event takes place and the specific characteristics and combination of factors in each location? You could reach this conclusion and include it to really round your argument off. This is a big improvement Mert. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hazardous Environments section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hazardous Environments essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The number of fatalities that result from volcanic and seismic natural hazards is related ...

    4 star(s)

    With large numbers of volunteers coming in from all over Iran, the main plea for help after the earthquake was for medicine and equipment to help the tens of thousands injured in the quake. There were a number of reasons for the high death toll; poor construction of buildings; lack

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Explain the increasing frequency of Hydro-meteorological Hazards.

    3 star(s)

    encouragement people are given to report any possibilities that a hazard is going to take place in any area. One organisation, which encourages this, is the Belgium based, Centre for Research of the Epidemiology of disasters, this business encourages people to report and possible suggestions of a natural hazard in their area.

  1. Discuss the physical and human factors which effect the location and the impact of ...

    far below ground then the shock waves will be absorbed by the ground and the impact that the earthquake will have will be minimal. But if the focus is located several meters below ground such as during the Loma Prieta earthquake in 1989 then the impact will be devastating.

  2. Explain why tectonic processes produce a variety of contrasting landscapes 70 marks

    weathering act as planes of weakness within the structure allowing for more rapid weathering known as hydrolysis (OCR AS &A2 Geology Textbook 2008). Granite is particularly susceptible to kaolinisation, which is the rapid break down of feldspar minerals (feldspars make up 30-40% of granite)

  1. The Human Impacts of Tectonic Landforms & Hazards

    Social impacts on people: Human life is irreplaceable. Volcanoes ? most impact on human life is due to pyroclastic flows or lahars (e.g. Nevado del Ruiz). Earthquakes ? tsunamis are particularly terrifying. The 1883 Krakatau eruption triggered tsunamis that killed 36 000 and destroyed 165 coastal villages.

  2. The Japanes Tsunami Disaster.

    to stay safe because their houses would have been crushed by the tsunami or fall because of the magnitude 9 earthquake. In the shelters, the people got free food and water to keep them alive. Almost everywhere there was no gas or electricity because of the impact of the tsunami.

  1. California and the Phillippines - Hazard Hotspots and Human Management of Risks

    This approach is also followed in California and has proved to be very successful. Furthermore, under the ?Hyogo Framework for Action?, this has been discussed that every disaster should have a disaster management plan. So people know hat exactly should be done during an earthquake.

  2. Volcanic and seismic events are major pieces of evidence towards proving that plate-tectonics theory ...

    Notwithstanding all of the empirical evidence presented by Wegener and later by du Toit and others, most geologists simply refused to entertain the idea that continents might have moved during the past. The geologists were not necessarily being obstinate about accepting new ideas; rather, they found the evidence for continental drift inadequate and unconvincing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work