• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

Volcanic and seismic events are major pieces of evidence towards proving that plate-tectonics theory is valid Discuss the extent to which you agree with this statement. [40 marks]

Extracts from this document...


?Volcanic and seismic events are major pieces of evidence towards proving that plate-tectonics theory is valid? Discuss the extent to which you agree with this statement. [40 marks] Definition 1. This approach turned out to be plate tectonics?the theory that the continents are carried along on huge slabs, or plates, of the Earth?s outermost layer. In other places plates have been slowly converging, forming compressional features like huge mountain ranges. In other places plates have been moving apart, forming expansional features like the great rift valleys. The theory of plate tectonics provided, for the first time, a coherent, unified explanation for all of these features of the Earth?s surface. Continental drift ? Jigsaw model 1. In 1910, Alfred Wegener began lecturing and writing scientific papers about continental drift. The continental drift hypothesis suggested that the continents have not always been in their present locations but instead have ?drifted? and changed positions. Wegener?s idea was that the continents had once been joined together in a single ?supercontinent,? which he called Pangaea (pronounced PanJEE-ah), meaning ?all lands? (Fig. 4.1). He suggested that Pangaea had split into fragments like pieces of ice floating on a pond and that the continental fragments had slowly drifted to their present locations. But Wegeners main problem was that he could not find a mechanism with which such movement was possible to his ideas were largely dismissed. 2. If you look at a map of the world, it?s obvious that the Atlantic coastlines of Africa and South America seem to match, almost like puzzle pieces. The southern coast of Australia similarly seems to match part of the coast of Antarctica, to its south; the same is true of some other continental coastlines. Is this apparent fit an accident, or does it truly support the hypothesis that the continents were once joined together? 3. To answer this question, we must first recognize that the edge of the land, that is, the shoreline, usually isn?t the true edge of the continent (Fig. 4.2). ...read more.


They plotted the pathways of the poles on maps and referred to the phenomenon as apparent polar wandering (Fig. 4.10). Geophysicists were puzzled by this evidence because they knew that the Earth?s magnetic poles and its axis of rotation are always close together. When it was discovered that the path of apparent polar wandering measured in North America differed from that measured in Europe, geophysicists were even more puzzled. They knew that it was extremely unlikely that the magnetic poles had moved. Instead they concluded, somewhat reluctantly, that it must have been the continents themselves that had moved, carrying their magnetic rocks with them. Thus, the apparent polar wandering path of a continent, determined from the paleomagnetism of rocks of different ages, provides a historical record of the movement of that continent relative to the positions of the magnetic poles. Note from Figure 4.10 that the apparent polar wandering paths of Europe and North America are separate from 600 million years ago to about 50 million years ago. You might also notice that the shapes of the paths look rather similar. In fact, if you rotate Europe and North America from their present positions and reassemble them as a single continent, as if the Atlantic Ocean weren?t there, an interesting thing happens: the two paths overlap and fit together exactly. This indicates that Europe and North America were moving together as a single continent during, the several hundred million years represented by these paths. This was?and still is?a very powerful argument for the existence, long ago, of a supercontinent that eventually split into separately moving pieces. How can the apparent wandering of the magnetic poles be best explained? As paleomagnetic research progressed during the 1950s, some unexpected results emerged. When geologists measured the paleomagnetism of geologically recent rocks, they found it was generally consistent with Earth?s current magnetic field. The paleomagnetism of ancient rocks, though, showed different orientations. ...read more.


Another example is the fresh water reptile, Mesosaurus, which was also found in southern Brazil and South Africa, both in Permian-aged rocks, and given that it was less than ½ metre long and was unable to swim in salty water it is inconceivable how it would have travelled across Atlantic Ocean to inhabit these two areas. In both examples the rock structure in which the fossils were found was very similar giving further evidence to support the plate tectonics theory. The deposits left by glacial ice sheets provide further evidence towards proving the plate tectonics theory. As glacial ice moves, it striates the underlying rocks and produces folds and wrinkles in soft sediments whilst depositing layers of till. These features left behind in glacial deposits provide evidence of the direction the ice was moving during the glaciation. For instance in South America and Africa there are very thick glacial till deposits both from the Permian-Carboniferous age. The deposits match almost exactly when the continents are moved back together. Using Africa and South America as an example, when they are moved back together, the direction of ice movement on both continents is consistent, radiating outward from the center of the former ice sheet. The extent of this evidence implies two lines of evidence both supporting plate tectonics. Firstly due to the distance between Africa and South America it is highly unlikely that a glacier could have existed that spanned the whole Atlantic Ocean and secondly, the practically identical features suggests that both South America and Africa were at the same equatorial locations, in order to have similar climates as such a glacier could not form in present conditions, hence they must have been once joined together in Gondawana as it is consistent with the findings that have been discussed. It’s hard to imagine how such similar glacial features could have been created if the continents had not once been joined together. Africa and South America must have had similar climates during this period, colder than their present-day climates. This also suggests that they were not in their present equatorial locations. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hazardous Environments section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hazardous Environments essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the degree to which the theory of plate tectonics is supported by seismic ...

    5 star(s)

    The majority of volcanoes are found at constructive and destructive plate margins (this can be seen in image 2, where the triangles represent areas that are volcanically active). At divergent margins the most common type of volcano is a fissure volcano, these occur when an elongated crack in the crust allows lava to escape.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Volcanic & Seismic events are pieces of evidence proving that the plate tectonics theory ...

    4 star(s)

    to rip through the surrounding area, an example of this is the 1995 earthquake in Kobe, Japan where the plate slipped over 1m. Earthquakes are also common however at conservative margins, where plates slip past each other and the build up of friction can cause seismic activity regularly.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The extent to which volcanic processes represent hazards depends on where and when they ...

    3 star(s)

    and warned villagers in threatened areas to move to safer ground. People living within a 10 kilometres (6.2 mi) zone were told to evacuate. The evacuation orders affected at least 19,000 people however the number that complied at that time remained unclear to authorities.

  2. Volcanic & Seismic events are major factors towards proving that the plate tectonics theory ...

    Earthquakes are also common however at conservative margins, where plates slip past each other and the build up of friction can cause seismic activity regularly. The San Andreas fault for example in California is a conservative margin and the fault lines show where the crust has failed, the slippages of plates here caused the 1989 San Francisco earthquake.

  1. Evaluate how plate tectonics theory helps our understanding of the distribution of seismic and ...

    Constructive margins are also part of the theory. This is where no plate is created or destroyed, but the plates simply move past each other at varying speeds. This movement creates a build up of friction and energy, which is released as an earthquake, when the plates suddenly move.

  2. Continental Drift - the evidence that supports the theory.

    How could these seemingly contradictory observations be reconciled? Plate tectonics provided the answer. When the different land masses were connected, the same or closely related plants and animals inhabited each. After the land masses were separated, the different populations were geographically isolated from each other by great distances of ocean.

  1. 'The hazards presented by volcanic and seismic events have the greatest impact on the ...

    After being reignited in 1990 due to a magnitude 8 earthquake, Pinatubo went on to erupt in 1991. The effect of this eruption was enormous. 30 million tonnes of sulphur dioxide was released, reducing average global temperatures by up to 0.5C.

  2. To what extent can the theory of plate tectonics explain global distribution of ...

    The studies look at the magnetism in ancient rocks and record the intensity and direction of the Earth?s magnetic field at the approximate time of the rocks formation. These magnetic surveys of the oceanic crust found stripes of anomalies, where the strength of the magnetic field differed, in the rocks that are parallel and symmetric around ridges in the crust.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work