• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Copenhagen summit COP15 a success?

Extracts from this document...


Was the Copenhagen summit COP15 a success? COP15 was a gathering of political leaders to agree on an accord to combat climate change. The UNFCCC agreed to approve the draft accord on 18th December 2009. The first earth summit took place in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, 4 years after the IPCC was established. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change was agreed on which committed countries to preventing "dangerous climate change". Shortly after the IPCC established a strong link between man-made emissions and the rising global temperature, the Kyoto Protocol was agreed under the UNFCCC in 1997. This was a breakthrough for the battle against climate change and also determined the first and it seems the only emission reduction targets. The protocol was finally made legally binding in 2005. The most recent earth summit before COP15 was the Ponzan Climate conference in Poland in 2008. Unfortunately the progress on negotiations was slow mainly due to the elections going on in the USA. Within this time span the IPCC made four assessments, and evidence of the effects of climate change started occurring in the form of melting glaciers, severe drought and heat waves, and hurricane Katrina. COP15 was meant to be a leap forward in the combat against climate change, with bigger, complex plans for a low-carbon future. ...read more.


There are already schemes operating in major deforesting countries such as Brazil and Indonesia, and international aid will have a significantly positive impact on the effectiveness of these schemes. A Technology Mechanism to accelerate the development of technology to support adaptation and mitigation was also mentioned. This is particularly crucial in respect of those developing countries that are already feeling the effects of climate change and need faster advances in technology in order adapt to them. However, there is no specific detail of where the funds will come from or guarantee that they will transpire. Many feel Gorden Brown, who has decided to use the already existing UK overseas aid budget to fund the CGCF (thereby using the same funds "twice"), has already exploited the lack of specificity. This means that part of the financial aid that would otherwise combat ongoing poverty and vulnerability to natural disasters is reduced by the amount that must now be committed to mitigating climate change - recession-induced penny-pinching. Apart from that, the deadline is far too far away and the budget barely a fifth of what is needed for LEDCs to cope with climate change according to WWF. Inflation is also likely to devalue the fund considerably by 2020. ...read more.


With this in mind, COP15 has still committed no emission reduction goals anywhere in the treaty apart from "recognition" of the need to keep the global temperature rise below 2C. Finally, the USA were fully behind the COP15 agreement but still turned up with very low ambitions, prepared to reduce emission by just 4% below 1990 levels compared to the EU's promise of a 20% reduction below 1990 levels. This sort of dedication was also applied to the Kyoto Protocol when the USA, who was at the time responsible for 25% of global emissions, pulled out of the Kyoto Protocol saying it was flawed. This participation of the USA was initially crucial to the ratification of the treaty but luckily Russia did sign bringing the reductions quota up to the required level and the treaty was able to go ahead. Only developed countries were required to commit to emission reduction goals, and big developing countries (and big emitters) such as India, China and Brazil did not have to ratify. COP15 did succeed in bringing all nations rich and poor together with the one subject in mind and LEDCs were also required to show some ambition towards emission cuts assuming financial help from developed countries. However, as mentioned before, there were no binding agreements over any emission goals. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Environmental Management section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Environmental Management essays

  1. What are the effects of Deforestation?

    Environmental Soil Science, 2000, Marcel & Dekker Inc.). Therefore, deforestation in the tropics has a pronounced disruption of the nitrogen cycle. Impacts of Deforestation on Cycles (illustrated by diagram): These diagrams have been constructed for the purpose of illustrating the relationship between different states of nitrogen in the global environment.

  2. Contemporary issue assignment

    before implementing any activity that may have an impact on the environment. (Safkar. K., Noronha. L., 1999)

  1. Evaluate The Impact Of Deforestation In Indonesia.

    Although many people in the MEDC (more economically developed country) may criticise the deforesting Indonesian people, it is their demand for rainforest products such as rubber, hardwood timber and drugs that encourages the country to deforest their land so heavily.

  2. Global Climate Change and Climate Protection: Current Summary

    of 23,900 times the effects of CO2. The currently estimated 1996 U.S. total greenhouse gas emissions are about 1,753 metric tons of carbon or carbon equivalent, or an increase of 8.3 percent over 1990 (EIA 1997). About 98.5 percent of U.S. human-made or anthropogenic CO2 emissions are caused by the combustion of fossil fuels to provide energy; U.S.

  1. Russia's dilemma - Is Russia going to sign the Kyoto treaty?

    emission giants, China and India, aren't covered by the protocol since they are considered developing countries.4 Under these circumstances, Russia is faced with the dilemma of ratifying or resigning the Kyoto treaty and Russian government has been trying to weigh the pros and cons of signing the treaty based on Moscow's economic and foreign policy goals.


    the nature of any of the proposed changes and 2) the origin of the need to change. The Decent Home Standard is a target which the government set in July 2000 to "ensure that all social housing meets set standards of decency by 2010, by reducing the number of households

  1. A report concerning new business development in the local area, which is the Paddington ...

    In the summer of 2006, NWCS will be knocked down and as a result further businesses will have the opportunity to locate their outlets in the area. Thus this will encourage competition and end in more satisfied residents. Several people our group questioned, argued that as the school is changing

  2. Climate change

    * The total value, globally, of new wind power installed in 2006 was �12 billion - and the industry grows by an astounding 30 per cent or more a year. * But the UK is only seizing a small percentage of that market, and we're being left behind.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work