• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

World Development

Extracts from this document...


INTRODUCTION My coursework will be on World Development and its varied aspects of the three different worlds and their references of MEDC'S and LEDC'S, the decision on why a countries developing, slow development of countries explained and explanation on why the worlds an unfair place. The definition of world development is the progress of resources to improve living standards of those in poverty struck areas. Increasing and easing poor people's basic needs accessibility and supplying the basic living conditions for releasing them from poverty and debt cycles. It also involves the management of materials of wealth within countries once a place is developed. There are different types of worlds sectioned according to its development. The nations are split into three sections- 1st world, second world and third world countries. The 'first world countries' refer to as developed, capitalist, industrial countries, roughly an area of countries along by the USA with common political and economical interests: North America, Western Europe, Japan and Australia. The 'second world countries' are referred as the (former) communist -socialist industrial states, (used to be the Eastern block, the territory and sphere of influence the union of Soviet Socialist Republic) today: Russia, Eastern Europe (e.g. Poland) and some of the Turk states (e.g. Kazakhstan) as well as China. These countries are quite developed but not more sophisticated in this aspect than 1st world countries. They are not rich as 1st world countries and not as poor as 3rd world countries. Third world countries referred to all the rest of the countries. Today often used to roughly describe the developing countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Although some countries are the poorest in the world like Somalia and Bangladesh; third world countries also include capitalist (e.g. Venezuela) and Communist (e.g. North Korea) countries as very rich (e.g. Saudi Arabia) and very poor (e.g. Mali) countries. 1st, 2nd, and 3rd world countries are also referred as MEDC'S and LEDC'S. ...read more.


shows the difference of wage for people living in MEDC'S and LEDC'S. The majority is over 5000 US dollars per person per year IN MEDC'S, and the wealth majority in the world is towards MEDC'S with 80% of world's total income. But those living in ld have more population to only receive 20% of the world's total income leaving them very poor. The majority for a person is under 200 dollars per person per year. There's a major division between MEDC'S and LEDC'S wealth for example the average weekly wage in the UK is �380. The income of a village, in Northern Uganda, is �380 a week (the village has 82 adults within). The Market Economies- the rich of developed world with Britain has a GNP of 14, 570 per Capita but compared to a 'low' income developing country like Bangladesh is 180 dollars per capita; but Bangladesh is a bigger country with a bigger population resulting an even less income creating a poorer wage. The MEDC'S have a slow population growth due to family planning, 25% of the worlds population, so there's less people and more resources to go around. Although the population will double in 80 years time. But that's nothing compared to LEDC'S with an extremely fast population growth, there's hardly or any family planning; 75% of the worlds population. This means there's less resources to go around for more people, resulting in an increase of suffering. There's an explosion in birth rates that the population will double in only 30 years time. The Market Economies - the rich, developed world with UK has a birth rate as 14 and a death rate as 12; but a 'low income' developing country- Bangladesh has a birth rate of 41 and a death rate of 14; meaning there's more births and less decrease in population since there's less deaths, therefore populations are imbalanced. ...read more.


Ranges of different accommodation available and chance to gain a better overall quality of life. There's a trend of countries counter-urbanising. 2/3 of people in MEDC'S are moving away from cities: counter-urbanisation. 60% world's urban population now live in LEDC'S. This migration cause's people from LEDC'S to move on in the world achieve better prospects for their lives in the future. Most of the times its one way migration of rural to urban. Now more than 1/2 of the world's population live in cities and the population will increase. CONCLUSION In conclusion I think that the world is an unfair place because the MEDC'S and LEDC'S have such a big gap. The LEDC'S need as much help as possible but the MEDC'S aren't making matters better, since it has far more than it needs for such a small population and obviously wastes which could relieve poverty. The LEDC'S have too little for too many people and needs the worlds wealth shared, although LEDC'S only receive help when there's a disaster and the receives help from MEDC'S which results in extra debt. This causes an unbreakable cycle, causing the richer to get richer and the poorer to get poorer. The MEDC'S should help cut a lot more with their wealth and not make matters worse by making LEDC'S development low down. There are many aid organisations that help and support poverty struck areas, trying to break the cycle of debt. But for the time being citizens of LEDC'S are moving to the outskirts of cities for immediate positive prospects, whatever the way by even living in shanty towns just to be receiving good services like MEDC'S people. In my opinion I believe the poor countries have the rich resources to help sustain the people but it can only succeed to do so if the government weren't so corrupt and put more into debt developing its basic systems of education etc;. In the future maybe the MEDC' will increase as much when urbanisation expands outwards converting the suburbs into towns when the population is too big as it increases steadily. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Population & Settlement section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Population & Settlement essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Comparison Between MEDC and LEDC

    4 star(s)

    In an LEDC the birth rate is high because the more children a family has means the greater the work force to go put and earn money. LEDC have a higher death rate therefore people tend to have more children to ensure more live to adulthood.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successful are the regeneration schemes in Liverpool?

    4 star(s)

    This is called 'A Bottom-up Approach'. The end result for The Eldonian Village was 145 homes-for rent only, it was the largest new built co-operative in Europe, mixture of homes 1, 2 and 3 bed bungalows and houses with between 2 and 4 beds. There were many extra facilities in the grounds, a village hall, sports

  1. I will discuss the differences and inequalities of China as a nation in its ...

    I mentioned that there are inland drainage basins and this is because of the precipitation that falls, because there is a consistent light rainfall and in the winter snowfall which can lie for up to 100 days. But there is a large annual temperature range being very low in winter

  2. Locality and Hapiness: A Study of Quality of Life

    The second interview I conducted was with Mr. Shawn, who is a resident of Whitechapel. I asked him lots of questions on Whitechapel and he helped me with relevant facts. I asked him what the Health was like and he gave the following answers; He said there is an NHS

  1. An Overview of Immigration to Australia

    2.4.3 Migrant statistics 1988-89 to 2001-02 Planning levels (a) Program Outcomes (a) Settler Arrivals Net Permanent Gain Net Overseas Migration (b) 1988-89 152 000 136 400 145 316 123 669 157 436 1989-90 152 500 132 500 121 227 93 370 124 647 1990-91 137 000 123 600 121 688 90 558 86 432 1991-92 123 000 110 900

  2. Why was Malthus wrong about Japan?

    Other checks on population must now be looked at to prove or disprove Malthus's theory. It is a given that fertility levels were low in Tokugawa Japan, so according to Malthus mortality must be a contributing factor of the population stagnation.

  1. To What Extent did the Gradual Abandonment of the Maoist Development Paradigm Between the ...

    There was a greater role for the market, reflected in the loosening of central control. Because this produced greater efficiency, Chinese goods would now be more suited to the international market, and the Chinese economy soon became export-led. There were probably going to be drawbacks to what essentially amounted to

  2. Rural development: Strategy for incorporating it into India's overall economic development agenda.

    Because of the space constraints the model couldn't be discussed in detail but we have tried to give an overview. Development indicators (which affect the long term economic conditions) that have been considered in this paper are: 1) Economic productivity; 2)Quality of Infrastructure and public services; 3)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work