• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

World Development

Extracts from this document...


INTRODUCTION My coursework will be on World Development and its varied aspects of the three different worlds and their references of MEDC'S and LEDC'S, the decision on why a countries developing, slow development of countries explained and explanation on why the worlds an unfair place. The definition of world development is the progress of resources to improve living standards of those in poverty struck areas. Increasing and easing poor people's basic needs accessibility and supplying the basic living conditions for releasing them from poverty and debt cycles. It also involves the management of materials of wealth within countries once a place is developed. There are different types of worlds sectioned according to its development. The nations are split into three sections- 1st world, second world and third world countries. The 'first world countries' refer to as developed, capitalist, industrial countries, roughly an area of countries along by the USA with common political and economical interests: North America, Western Europe, Japan and Australia. The 'second world countries' are referred as the (former) communist -socialist industrial states, (used to be the Eastern block, the territory and sphere of influence the union of Soviet Socialist Republic) today: Russia, Eastern Europe (e.g. Poland) and some of the Turk states (e.g. Kazakhstan) as well as China. These countries are quite developed but not more sophisticated in this aspect than 1st world countries. They are not rich as 1st world countries and not as poor as 3rd world countries. Third world countries referred to all the rest of the countries. Today often used to roughly describe the developing countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Although some countries are the poorest in the world like Somalia and Bangladesh; third world countries also include capitalist (e.g. Venezuela) and Communist (e.g. North Korea) countries as very rich (e.g. Saudi Arabia) and very poor (e.g. Mali) countries. 1st, 2nd, and 3rd world countries are also referred as MEDC'S and LEDC'S. ...read more.


shows the difference of wage for people living in MEDC'S and LEDC'S. The majority is over 5000 US dollars per person per year IN MEDC'S, and the wealth majority in the world is towards MEDC'S with 80% of world's total income. But those living in ld have more population to only receive 20% of the world's total income leaving them very poor. The majority for a person is under 200 dollars per person per year. There's a major division between MEDC'S and LEDC'S wealth for example the average weekly wage in the UK is �380. The income of a village, in Northern Uganda, is �380 a week (the village has 82 adults within). The Market Economies- the rich of developed world with Britain has a GNP of 14, 570 per Capita but compared to a 'low' income developing country like Bangladesh is 180 dollars per capita; but Bangladesh is a bigger country with a bigger population resulting an even less income creating a poorer wage. The MEDC'S have a slow population growth due to family planning, 25% of the worlds population, so there's less people and more resources to go around. Although the population will double in 80 years time. But that's nothing compared to LEDC'S with an extremely fast population growth, there's hardly or any family planning; 75% of the worlds population. This means there's less resources to go around for more people, resulting in an increase of suffering. There's an explosion in birth rates that the population will double in only 30 years time. The Market Economies - the rich, developed world with UK has a birth rate as 14 and a death rate as 12; but a 'low income' developing country- Bangladesh has a birth rate of 41 and a death rate of 14; meaning there's more births and less decrease in population since there's less deaths, therefore populations are imbalanced. ...read more.


Ranges of different accommodation available and chance to gain a better overall quality of life. There's a trend of countries counter-urbanising. 2/3 of people in MEDC'S are moving away from cities: counter-urbanisation. 60% world's urban population now live in LEDC'S. This migration cause's people from LEDC'S to move on in the world achieve better prospects for their lives in the future. Most of the times its one way migration of rural to urban. Now more than 1/2 of the world's population live in cities and the population will increase. CONCLUSION In conclusion I think that the world is an unfair place because the MEDC'S and LEDC'S have such a big gap. The LEDC'S need as much help as possible but the MEDC'S aren't making matters better, since it has far more than it needs for such a small population and obviously wastes which could relieve poverty. The LEDC'S have too little for too many people and needs the worlds wealth shared, although LEDC'S only receive help when there's a disaster and the receives help from MEDC'S which results in extra debt. This causes an unbreakable cycle, causing the richer to get richer and the poorer to get poorer. The MEDC'S should help cut a lot more with their wealth and not make matters worse by making LEDC'S development low down. There are many aid organisations that help and support poverty struck areas, trying to break the cycle of debt. But for the time being citizens of LEDC'S are moving to the outskirts of cities for immediate positive prospects, whatever the way by even living in shanty towns just to be receiving good services like MEDC'S people. In my opinion I believe the poor countries have the rich resources to help sustain the people but it can only succeed to do so if the government weren't so corrupt and put more into debt developing its basic systems of education etc;. In the future maybe the MEDC' will increase as much when urbanisation expands outwards converting the suburbs into towns when the population is too big as it increases steadily. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Population & Settlement section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Population & Settlement essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Comparison Between MEDC and LEDC

    4 star(s)

    Traditions and religions are also a reason why the birth rate is high; due to religious beliefs, where contraception and abortion are forbidden.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successful are the regeneration schemes in Liverpool?

    4 star(s)

    However, the success of the Eldonian villages shows that it can be done. In the future I think a lot more regeneration projects will happen within the city boundary. Making more room for new families and more accessibility for the elderly but also helping the original residence.

  1. Geography revision - flooding - Urbanisation - Population problems

    by road, low labour force, require skilled workers, require a large factory. SO . . . can be located nearly anywhere. Types City Centre - Shopping and commercial centre, is accessible, with the biggest and largest stores because only they can afford the high land prices.

  2. Urbanisation In LEDCs

    Large-scale migration has taken place from the countryside to Lima, one-third of whose 8 million people are migrants. Most migrants are younger, better-educated villagers from the mountainous area. Most people are migrating because much of Peru is difficult to farm and develop because only 5% of Peru is made up

  1. An Overview of Immigration to Australia

    2.4.3 Migrant statistics 1988-89 to 2001-02 Planning levels (a) Program Outcomes (a) Settler Arrivals Net Permanent Gain Net Overseas Migration (b) 1988-89 152 000 136 400 145 316 123 669 157 436 1989-90 152 500 132 500 121 227 93 370 124 647 1990-91 137 000 123 600 121 688 90 558 86 432 1991-92 123 000 110 900

  2. Brent Cross shall have a bigger sphere of influence than High Wycombe

    Another problem would have been that I would not have been able to work out the distance that they traveled from. I then put forward some solutions to my problems and came up with my improved questionnaire. Geography Questionnaire Hello I am from D.C.G.S and am investigating the sphere of influence of different stores for my GCSE Geography course work.

  1. Global Community and Immigration in the United States

    Second, it is also worth noting that many illegal aliens come to the United States to join friends and family members who are legal residents. Communities of recent legal immigrants serve as magnets for illegal immigration by providing housing, jobs and entree to America.

  2. Why was Malthus wrong about Japan?

    On the matter of infanticide in Japan, contrasting ideas make it difficult to conclude if Malthus was correct in his assumption. However what can be concluded is that villages would have undoubtedly varied in their practices and beliefs. From a persons study of one village it would be wrong to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work