Compare the impact of social factors on the health of young rural people to those of young people living in an Australian city.

Authors Avatar

Question

The ability of young Australians to maintain good health is related largely to the following social factors – socioeconomic status, employment, education, gender, ethnicity, aboriginality, geographical location, sexual orientation, peer influence.

Compare the impact of these social factors on the health of young rural people to those of young people living in an Australian city.

In your answer propose explanations of how each social factor might impact on the health of both groups and discuss any differences, similarities and inequalities that exist. (Approx 1500 words)

Response

“Health” to the World Health Organisation is: ‘a state of complete physical, mental and social wellbeing, and not merely the absence of diseases or infirmity.’ Young people are 12-24 years

(Australia’s Young People: Their Health and Wellbeing 2003).

In June 2003 there were 3.6 million young people. Approximately 16% of them were born overseas. Nearly 70% lived in major cities, 19% lived in inner regional areas and around 11% lived in outer regional and remote areas.

A person’s health is impacted by biomedical and genetic factors; health behaviours; socioeconomic factors; environmental factors; and general background factors (example: culture, politics and policies, media). The health, behaviour and attitudes of young people today are Australia’s future health. Young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people do not share the same good health.

Various social factors contribute to the health of young people

Socioeconomic status

The socially disadvantaged people live shorter lives and suffer more illness than those who are well off. Even those at the middle levels of society exhibit poorer health than the wealthy.

A socioeconomic disadvantaged person may have low income (unable to buy best health services); have poor education and limited access to health services; be unemployed; live in poor housing; and/or working in an unrewarding or menial job. Over time, the disadvantages affect their health and wellbeing. They suffer from anxiety, low self-esteem and social isolation, which influence health-related behaviours and health itself. Socioeconomic status impacts health outcomes and health services delivery, more markedly on the disadvantaged in the rural areas.

Young persons from lower socioeconomic groups are more likely to have lifestyle risk factors (smoking, lack exercise, overweight or obesity risk drinking, lack fruit consumption), report fair or poor health, and suffer from mental retardation, epilepsy, higher hospitalisation rate (especially single mothers). The 2001 National Health Survey found that disadvantaged persons suffer from long-term health conditions including diabetes, diseases of circulatory system and the ear, and arthritis. They have greater use of doctors and hospital outpatient/casualty services, but are less likely to use preventive health services. Disadvantaged indigenous persons have greater risk of ill health, early death and reduced wellbeing.

Join now!

Australia’s Young People: Their Health and Wellbeing 2003 reported that injury is the leading cause of death of young people, particularly young males (more involved in risk-taking behaviours) who are socioeconomically disadvantaged, people who live in remote and rural areas, and indigenous Australians. Causes of injury varied with socioeconomic status. Persons from low socioeconomic status commit suicide, harm themselves or be killed or assaulted; mid-range socioeconomic groups have transport accidents other than pedestrian injury; and both the very high and very low socioeconomic groups experience pedestrian injuries and drug overdoses.

Studies also found that more likely: female-headed one-parent ...

This is a preview of the whole essay