Recent reports from the National institute for health and clinical excellence are pointing to doctors being able to make descisions as to whether or not certain groups of patients should receive treatment, the proposals make no devide between rich and poor, or age or gender.

They simply revolve around the fact that those patients suffering from complanits that they have inflicted upon themselves by smoking, drinking heavily, abusing drugs and over-eating, should be denied treatment unless they can prove that they are actively engaged in seeking to change their descructive habits.

Join now!

What is your opinion on this subject?

I am concerned with the outcome of decisions on who could and who

could not be treated – what are the obligations to those who would not be

treated?

Clarity is needed around this and what the ‘end-point’

would be for such people.

It's not only the issues over drug users and smokers. Should other groups be prioritised, for example should children's services have priorty over services for senior citizens. But surely prioritising one group over another is wrong.

Resources used to treat smokers and drug ...

This is a preview of the whole essay