• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Smoking be banned in Public Places?

Extracts from this document...


English Essay - 'It's time that smoking was banned in public places' Should Smoking be banned in Public Places? In my opinion I think smoking should banned from public places. My reasons for this are; People who smoke should be considerate of that fact that not only are they damaging their own existing health but also they are harming the others around them who are only breathing in the tobacco smoke. During the past ten years of tests, experiments etc. on the effect of smoking both directly and passive, there is now enough scientific evidence to prove that exposure to second-hand smoke both harms health, and worsens existing health problems and at least one thousand people are estimated to die each year in the UK as the result of exposure to other people's tobacco smoke. This means that not only are the smokers making their health even worse and increasing their chances of getting diseases such as cancer or bronchitis but also they are killing those around them knowingly. ...read more.


Out of the 4,000 chemicals there are in the smoke these three have a very large affect on the body. The tar is what coats the lining of the lungs making them less able to take in oxygen; it also contains carcinogens, which is the fundamental cause of cancer. The Carbon Monoxide is a poisoness gas that joins up with the red blood cells making them incapable of transporting oxygen around the body. And lastly the Nicotine is the addictive drug which raises the heart beat, narrows the arteries causing high blood pressure, which in most cases leads to heart disease. Already these three chemicals have a vast affect on the health of any person. So if people do smoke and have to then why should those that don't smoke have to be affected as well by these toxic chemicals? Smokers aren't always aware of what damage they are doing both to themselves and the others around them. ...read more.


I think that these two countries should encourage other cities and countries to ban smoking in public places as well and prove that with this ban, there will be a decrease in the number of diseases and deaths from passive smoking. But not only is it that adults are smoking, but more recently teenagers or children from a very early age are actually smoking, some probably knowing the few short - term affects of it but not realising what the long term affects of smoking are. In conclusion, not only will the ban of smoking in public places benefit the non - smokers or those suffering from passive smoking, the smokers can also be satisfied with doing it in another enclosed environment away from others. I think this is a good idea because; currently we are nowhere near banning smoking completely. So for a temporary solution to reduce health problems for passive smoking, the ban will help to isolate the smokers and then possibly leading up to smokers having to give up when maybe the day that cigarettes are banned completely. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Healthcare section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Healthcare essays

  1. Should Smoking in Public Places Be Banned?

    Why it shouldn't be banned Firstly, smoking undoubtedly helps many people to relax. For some, it even improves concentration. Many people like to smoke before exams or when they are relaxing with friends. It is considered sociable and if there was a ban and someone wanted a cigarette, they would

  2. What are the arguments FOR and AGAINST a ban on smoking in public places?

    The main campaigning lobby in favour of the ban are Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) - a public health charity that aims to 'generate the public and political impetus for the measures that will reduce tobacco use and ultimately tackle the epidemic of disease and death that it causes.'

  1. Smoking in Public Places should be banned

    It has been found that passive smoking significantly increases the risk of sudden infant death syndrome. These are unnecessary deaths and if smoking in public places was banned most of these could have been prevented. But, some of these deaths cannot have been prevented, because some of the children who suffer are put in this danger by their irresponsible parents.

  2. Should Smoking be banned in all public places?

    Passive smoking is the inhaling of smoke from other smokers. Roy Castle is an example of someone who died from passive smoke. He died of lung cancer through the inhaling of smoke whilst playing his trumpet in a nightclub, yet he never smoked himself.

  1. shoud smoking be banned in public places

    it's a sticky black residue that causes cancer. Carbon Monoxide An odourless, tasteless and poisonous gas. It makes breathing more difficult as it combines with the body's blood which carries oxygen around the body. Oxygen is essential for our bodies to work properly.

  2. Should smoking be prohibited in public places?

    The other way round, a non-smoker does not affect the health of the smoker just by standing somewhere. What comes next is the environmental pollution a smoker causes. First, he pollutes the fresh air around him. Then he throws his fag end on the street or on the rails instead of using ashtrays.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work