Should smoking be prohibited in public places?
Extracts from this essay...
09th December 2001 Composition III Shane Denson Monday, 11-13 Maja Szydlowska The Nine Paragraph Analytical Essay: Should smoking be prohibited in public places? Have you ever noticed that whenever you are in a circle of friends and there is a smoker among them, they all go and sit down in the smoking area for the sake of the smoker? And have you ever noticed that whenever somebody smokes, the surrounding area within a radius of at least three metres has the pleasure to enjoy the smoke? The discussion on the prohibition of smoking in public places has been going on since years, and it is now actualised one more time by the announcement of the Deutsche Bahn according to which smoking on railway platforms will be prohibited. After presenting the opposite view, I will argue that smoking should be forbidden in public, using a few arguments which I will defend against possible counterarguments to prove my point of view. One of the most important laws of the German Constitution is the principle of freedom.
Yet, they could refer to medical findings which prove that smoke does only affect one's health if consuming it regularly over a long period of time. Besides, they could mention that they are already bothered by the inconvenience of having to sit in smoking areas which some public places as restaurants or cafes have set up and which are in general in some back corner of the room, so that a non-smoker does not necessarily come in contact with cigarette smoke if he does not want to. Of course smoking does only affect you in long-term contact. But is there even the smallest possibility of not getting in contact with smoke regularly over a long period of time? Experience shows that a non-smoker cannot move freely in public without getting in contact with cigarette smoke. If you wait for the bus or the train there will always be somebody who is smoking cigarettes. If you go to a discotheque or to a pub or bar you will find that the majority is smoking there likewise.
Nevertheless, these are only weak arguments not excusing the polluting of environment. The announcement of the Deutsche Bahn shows that the majority of smokers do actually throw their cigarette ends away, otherwise there would be no cause for such an examination. The findings base on long-term studies which show that an amount of a few millions Deutschmark could be saved during a year if smoking on railway platforms was prohibited. The cigarette tax is therefore only a small contribution to the cleaning costs our state has to pay. Moreover, the health damaging effect smoke causes also burdens medical insurance companies. Hence, the cigarette tax does not stabilise the economy in any way. Lastly, nobody smokes because of such unselfish feelings as patriotism or for the sake of economy. In conclusion, all arguments mentioned against the prohibition of smoking in public fail to be valid. The discussion on this topic automatically leads to the disadvantages smoking has for health and environment, and these are medically and statistically proved. Thus, there are undeniable reasons for stopping to smoke or at least for not affecting other people with cigarette smoke in public. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1
Found what you're looking for?
- Start learning 29% faster today
- Over 150,000 essays available
- Just £6.99 a month
- Over 180,000 student essays
- Every subject and level covered
- Thousands of essays marked by teachers