The Aging Effects of Canada's Population

Authors Avatar

The Aging Effects of Canada’s Population

        It was 1947, World War II had finally come to a halt and Canadian soldiers were sent home.  The large number of males returning back to their countries quickly made up for lost time which, in turn, triggered the Baby Boom.  The United States, Australia, and New Zealand were all faced with baby booms; however, Canada had the loudest boom of all which lasted from 1947 to 1966.  At the height of the boom, Canadian women were averaging four children each which explains why today that the Canadian population is approximately one-third boomers.  When a new product or idea is introduced it is likely targeted to this group simply because there are just so many of them that everyone takes notice.  Why did the baby boom happen?  Canadians knew they could afford large families since the economy was prospering and the future seemed bright.  Also, immigration rates dramatically rose in the 1950s which, in turn, resulted in additional people of childbearing age and therefore they made a central role in the boom.   Once the birth-control pill was introduced in 1961 and women were becoming more accepted into the labour force there was a substantial decline in fertility over the 1960s known as the Baby Bust.  While the baby boomers grew up and had offspring of their own it created a mini boom from 1980 to 1995 called the Baby Boom Echo.  A direct consequence of the ongoing global fertility and mortality decline at older ages, population aging is expected to be among the most prominent global demographic trends of the 21st century (Foot, 1996).  This pattern is expected to continue over the next few decades, eventually affecting the entire world.  Population aging has many important socio-economic and health consequences.  It presents challenges for public health due to the lack of capacity and funds as well as for economic development, specifically the shrinking and aging of the labour force.  The aging of the workforce is taking place as Canada is shifting to a knowledge-based economy, where a constant renewal of skills is necessary to keep up with rapid changes in knowledge, technology and information.  As a result, the risks that labour shortages will deepen is expanding.  Shifts in population size within various age groups have far-reaching social, economic and policy impacts (Dowd, 1980). This evolution has shaped Canada’s demographic past, present and future as the number of pre-schoolers, students, workers at the beginning, middle or end of their careers, retirees and so on have a profound effect on the many trends in our society (McPherson, 1990).  

The Movement

        While beginning this new millennium, Canadians are going through a time of dramatic social, economic and political change.  The increasingly integrated global and economic markets along with the developments in technology have facilitated globalization and have made a huge impact on the lifestyles of Canadians (Canadian Institute of Actuaries, 2001)).  With Canada’s aging population on the rise (Exhibit 1), it is obvious that different age cohorts will generate different trends.  Consequently, from 1966 to 2001 Canada's total population increased 50% from about 20 million to 30 million. During this 35-year period, the population aged 19 and under declined 8% to 7.7 million, while the population aged 65 and over more than doubled from 1.5 million to 3.9 million.  The proportion of people aged 65 and over is expected to increase more rapidly by 2011 which is when the front-end boomers reach that age. At the same time, the proportion of those aged 20 to 64 will start to decline, and their median age will stabilize (Statistics Canada, 2003).         

        Social trends and fads due to the fluctuations in the population have become evident and they will continue to change as time goes on.  “Age is the best forecasting tool because it is guaranteed to change”(Foot, 1996).  Just as the Canadian economy has changed, Canadian families also look very different today than those of 20 or 30 years ago. For instance, the dual-earner family with both spouses working has replaced the traditional family with a male breadwinner and a female homemaker.  Shrinking fertility rates have resulted in smaller families today with the average family size decreasing from 3.67 children in 1971 to 3.01 children in 1995.  As a result, these smaller families will be required to support larger numbers of aged family members.  This is fortunate due to the large cohort that is aging in Canada.  The fact that people are living longer suggests that many adults, at increasingly older ages, may need to provide dependant care for their own parents (Disney, 1996).  In general, families are having fewer children, young people are postponing family formation and child birth and marriage trends are changing.  The average age of first marriage for women has increased by roughly 4 years since 1961 to 26.3 years in 1995 (Natural Resources Canada, 2004).  Thus, families are more likely to have care responsibilities for their young offspring as well as for older family members.

Join now!

        Canadians have also become much more mobile. Many Canadian families now live miles away from other family members and friends. The 1996 Census, for example, found that 1 in 5 Canadians  have moved a significant distance between 1991 and 1996  (Statistics Canada, 2003).  This is due to a change in lifestyle as well as innovations in technology that have reformed Canada throughout the last 30 years.

        Just as family norms are shifting, so is the role of  the government in our lives. The scope of government activity in Canada has narrowed considerably just as the dependant-care needs of families have ...

This is a preview of the whole essay