• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

‘Ruthlessness and attention to detail brought him success’ - How adequately does this characterise the reign of HenryVII?

Extracts from this document...


'Ruthlessness and attention to detail brought him success.' How adequately does this characterise the reign of Henry VII? Historians disagree over whether Henry made drastic, moderate, little, even no, changes to the way in which the country was governed. One thing is for sure, and most historians are agreed on this, whatever he did it seemed to bring stability to the realm. England had been tormented by war and political faction in the 30 years prior to Bosworth, in a kind of long and drawn out civil war centered on the fates of two families - York and Lancaster. Henry VII was ruthless in his dealings with the nobility, in addition to this, his highly personal administration of financial policies also bought him success. However, other factors that contributed to his success included his cautious foreign policy combined with the good fortune that favored him. Henry's reign saw a decline in the powers of the nobility, threats dealt with promptly and effectively, and long periods of peaceful relations with other countries. During the wars of the roses the nobles had taken advantage of factional strife to increase their own power. Some historians such as J. R. Green and A. F. Pollard, have suggested that Henry saw the nobility as a danger and felt like he had to assert himself if he wanted to uphold his authority as a monarch. ...read more.


By keeping the nobles at a distance and imposing heavy penalties on those who were unwilling to match to his pattern of behaviour, Henry ensured that the factions never threatened his rule. Henry succeeded in controlling the nobility by creating few new peerages, thereby limiting their numbers. He also enforced laws against retaining firmly without fear or favour. In spite of his harshness, Henry still made good use of the nobility to help him rule at both local and national level. Henry made a significant impact in government through his personal interest in financial administration. He appreciated that his financial strength would weaken political rivals and enable him to keep a firmer grip on the aristocracy. The most significant source of revenue was the royal estates. Henry was also keen to emphasise his own power as king by asserting his feudal rights over the nobility. Henry also raised revenue from his position as feudal overlord. It has been estimated that the income from royal lands and ward ship went up during his reign by 45 %, from an annual average of �29 000 to �42 000. Unlike Edward IV, Henry made few grants of land to political supporters. The remaining revenue came mainly from parliament, which granted Henry customs duties for life. As all revenue was arranged to go directly into the chamber, money was then immediately available for royal use. ...read more.


In all these ways, Henry VII seems to conform to the pattern of a 'new monarch' and the battle of Bosworth can be held to signal the beginning of a new era in English history. Several historians have gone further to question whether such ruthless methods were really necessary in order for Henry to be successful and whether the English nobility had the capacity to challenge the king's authority. Lander believes that the political behaviour of the nobility was relatively good, and J.A.F. Thomson has stressed the damage done to the great feudal families as a result of henry's ruthlessness in bringing them under his control. Christine Carpenter goes further, and in her view, Henry VIII, with his total inexperience of English politics, failed to understand, and so failed to exploit, those relationships with the nobility by which his predecessors government, and by which they gained control of the localities. However, in conclusion, Henry VII was a successful king. In 1485, the country he ruled was financially, diplomatically and internally weak. However, by his death in 1509, his personal attention to detail meant that the crown was financially solvent. Also Henry's ruthlessness towards the nobility kept them under his control through legal terrorisation and the dread of financial ruin. He also left his son a country which was not at war as a result of his cautious foreign policy, was not racked by faction, that was more centralized in its administration than ever before, and which was respected by a number of major European powers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    The people that the reforming Tsar had originally set out to help, the peasants, were now being excluded from the reforms which would have had most impact on their lives and the social organisation of Russia. The military reforms introduced by Alexander were marginally more successful, in terms of having

  2. The Battle of Bosworth.

    This is due to the size of the hill. On my visit to the site the hill was clearly too small for more than 12,000 men.

  1. How Did Henry VII Manage to Secure the Throne After 1485?

    in June 1495. From there he fled to Scotland where James IV gave him support, he married Lady Catherine Gordon tightening his relations with the Scottish Royal family. This was the ultimate insult to Henry as he had previously tried to make peace with Scotland in the form of a marriage between the families but James IV had refused.

  2. Securing the Tudor Dynasty: The Reign of Henry VII.

    Dynastic interests quoted from Source 5 can also be seen in the defensive alliance against any country that decides to invade either country, this basically means a defensive alliance against France, and shows that Henry was keen to protect his dynasty from invasion.

  1. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    Charles believed he no longer required the military successes of Joan; thus her presence became less important until it reached the point where she was totally abandoned by her King. The concept of the Trial of Rehabilitation, approximately 20 years after the death of Joan of Arc, was a feeble

  2. Essay on ways in which Henry VII was successful

    they were also important in the revenue they created from the taxing, Henry would send consorts to nobilities estates to decide how much to tax them, this controlling nature of henrys didn?t stop there, he also over saw all the finances himself, this meant he could control the monarchy?s money

  1. Was Henry VII a successful monarch?

    They had him proclaimed king in Dublin in 1487 and, despite the fact that Henry had the real Warwick paraded in the streets of London to prove the imposture, an army gathered in England to support King Edward VI; and the eldest of the de la Poles, the Earl of Lincoln, fled to join the Yorkist force.

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    in the North of England ?in which (Sommerville, 2009) he promised the people who part took in the Pilgrimage of Grace? by ?travelling through major towns? such as York (Ives 2007, pg81), this links in with aspects in war as James V of Scotland failed to meet Henry on his travels which worsened their relationship.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work