• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

‘Ruthlessness and attention to detail brought him success’ - How adequately does this characterise the reign of HenryVII?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Ruthlessness and attention to detail brought him success.' How adequately does this characterise the reign of Henry VII? Historians disagree over whether Henry made drastic, moderate, little, even no, changes to the way in which the country was governed. One thing is for sure, and most historians are agreed on this, whatever he did it seemed to bring stability to the realm. England had been tormented by war and political faction in the 30 years prior to Bosworth, in a kind of long and drawn out civil war centered on the fates of two families - York and Lancaster. Henry VII was ruthless in his dealings with the nobility, in addition to this, his highly personal administration of financial policies also bought him success. However, other factors that contributed to his success included his cautious foreign policy combined with the good fortune that favored him. Henry's reign saw a decline in the powers of the nobility, threats dealt with promptly and effectively, and long periods of peaceful relations with other countries. During the wars of the roses the nobles had taken advantage of factional strife to increase their own power. Some historians such as J. R. Green and A. F. Pollard, have suggested that Henry saw the nobility as a danger and felt like he had to assert himself if he wanted to uphold his authority as a monarch. ...read more.

Middle

By keeping the nobles at a distance and imposing heavy penalties on those who were unwilling to match to his pattern of behaviour, Henry ensured that the factions never threatened his rule. Henry succeeded in controlling the nobility by creating few new peerages, thereby limiting their numbers. He also enforced laws against retaining firmly without fear or favour. In spite of his harshness, Henry still made good use of the nobility to help him rule at both local and national level. Henry made a significant impact in government through his personal interest in financial administration. He appreciated that his financial strength would weaken political rivals and enable him to keep a firmer grip on the aristocracy. The most significant source of revenue was the royal estates. Henry was also keen to emphasise his own power as king by asserting his feudal rights over the nobility. Henry also raised revenue from his position as feudal overlord. It has been estimated that the income from royal lands and ward ship went up during his reign by 45 %, from an annual average of �29 000 to �42 000. Unlike Edward IV, Henry made few grants of land to political supporters. The remaining revenue came mainly from parliament, which granted Henry customs duties for life. As all revenue was arranged to go directly into the chamber, money was then immediately available for royal use. ...read more.

Conclusion

In all these ways, Henry VII seems to conform to the pattern of a 'new monarch' and the battle of Bosworth can be held to signal the beginning of a new era in English history. Several historians have gone further to question whether such ruthless methods were really necessary in order for Henry to be successful and whether the English nobility had the capacity to challenge the king's authority. Lander believes that the political behaviour of the nobility was relatively good, and J.A.F. Thomson has stressed the damage done to the great feudal families as a result of henry's ruthlessness in bringing them under his control. Christine Carpenter goes further, and in her view, Henry VIII, with his total inexperience of English politics, failed to understand, and so failed to exploit, those relationships with the nobility by which his predecessors government, and by which they gained control of the localities. However, in conclusion, Henry VII was a successful king. In 1485, the country he ruled was financially, diplomatically and internally weak. However, by his death in 1509, his personal attention to detail meant that the crown was financially solvent. Also Henry's ruthlessness towards the nobility kept them under his control through legal terrorisation and the dread of financial ruin. He also left his son a country which was not at war as a result of his cautious foreign policy, was not racked by faction, that was more centralized in its administration than ever before, and which was respected by a number of major European powers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. The Battle of Bosworth.

    French, knowing by the king's shot the lie of the land and the order of his battle, resolved, in order to avoid the fire, to mass their troops against the flank rather than the front of the king's battle. Thus they obtained the mastery of his vanguard."

  2. Securing the Tudor Dynasty: The Reign of Henry VII.

    Dynastic interests quoted from Source 5 can also be seen in the defensive alliance against any country that decides to invade either country, this basically means a defensive alliance against France, and shows that Henry was keen to protect his dynasty from invasion.

  1. How Did Henry VII Manage to Secure the Throne After 1485?

    in June 1495. From there he fled to Scotland where James IV gave him support, he married Lady Catherine Gordon tightening his relations with the Scottish Royal family. This was the ultimate insult to Henry as he had previously tried to make peace with Scotland in the form of a marriage between the families but James IV had refused.

  2. How effective was Henry VII as a monarch?

    for sanctuary, and on the condition that Suffolk's life would be spared. Overall, Henry dealt with the threats he faced rather well; they were never able to progress quite to the point where the crown was in serious jeopardy, although Simnel did get close.

  1. How was Henry VII anti noble.

    Henry VII could not afford to contemplate their trust, or the possibility of the nobles over powering him would always play a key role during his reign. The new policies made by Henry could be portrayed that he was an anti-noble king, first of all, Henry introduced the following ideas;

  2. Henry VII and His Money.

    This was again largely due to the ruinous civil wars of the previous centuries, during which the machinery of government had run down to such an extent that it was unable to enforce its legal rights. Much of the money disappeared into baronial pockets, or those of supposed royal servants.

  1. Essay on ways in which Henry VII was successful

    The French received him as the duke of York. Henry had to be careful how he dealt with Warbeck the support he had could make henry lose his throne. Henry Made his son Henry VIII the duke of York at the age of 3, in order to stop Perkin being called this.

  2. Was Henry VII a successful monarch?

    left alive after the Wars in order to avoid noblemen rallying to them and thus plunging England in yet another civil war. Although Henry had married Elizabeth of York, therefore mingling the blood of the red and white roses, there still remained men who had an arguably more legitimate claim to the throne than he did.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work