• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“Bismarck detested liberal western ideologies because they eroded God – given order” Explain Bismarck’s views on liberalism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

YEAR 11 MODERN HISTORY, TOPIC ESSAY - CASE STUDY BISMARCK. 2. "Bismarck detested liberal western ideologies because they eroded God - given order" Explain Bismarck's views on liberalism. "By his statesmanship the frontier fringed with cannon, disappeared from within the limits of the father land. No longer now German seeks to take the life of his brother German. What Bismarck has done to Germany, still one greater had to the human race." Indeed a great man. Why the constant anti-liberalism throughout his years, though liberalism had almost achieved his aim, several times before he did, then? I will justify Bismarck's so called practical-dictatorship and point out, and agree, using many extracts, the problems of liberalism. I will also, along the way, exonerate and justify, Bismarck's methods of achievement, and disprove the bourgeoisie claim of Bismarck being an oppressor or dictator. Bismarck came to be the pivot of government, but within a constitutional framework, the many claims of dictatorship such as: "He had appointed a ministry of clerks out of the Government Offices, who do as ...read more.

Middle

Bismarck was a political realist (Realpolitik), who understood the techniques of diplomatic maneuver and how and when to use force. "Only a monarchial government possessing full authority to the army and diplomacy could carry out an effective foreign policy, being a nation situated in the middle of Europe. Insular England could afford democracy; Germany could not" Maybe this was the long term thinking when King Wilhelm rejected the offer of crown of the proposed democratic-liberal Germany. Were the liberal unification of 1850, to have succeeded, with a unification from the 'bottom upwards', this would surely have resulted in a weak, disillusioned, eventually civil-strife nation, like many of the small nations of the Bund. "The fundamental error of policy of those days was that people fancied they could attain through publicists, parliamentary or diplomatic hypocrisies results which could be had only by war or readiness to fight; in such shape, that they seemed forced upon our virtuous moderation as a reward for the oratical demonstrations of our 'German sentiment'. ...read more.

Conclusion

I agree that Prussia had become the destined nation to unify Germany, (as Wilhelm once said, we were born betrothed to Germany's unity). Of Austro-Hungary's 36million people, ONLY 6million were German, while of Prussia's 16million, 14 were German, who sounds like they are interested in benefiting the German unity? Austria had no right to lead the Confederacy into unity, as they were a multicultural, aristocratic, worn, racially strifed, Jewish state, that was purely bourgeois (not the Marxist defined 'bourgeoisie'). I disagree that Germany's unifying completely, was just Prussian expansionism. Prussia (Bismarck) led, having proved with his seldom yet powerfully military might, yet with often diplomatic restraint, rescuing not only Prussian militarism (dwindling because of the constant revolutionary activities), but "Perpetuated that subaltern spirit in German public life that was its natural concomitant." Bismarck restored complete nationalism saving the smaller states from the slow-down, inefficiency and deceit of complete democratic-liberalism, of which not even the USA had yet mastered, and after having proved its success, installed an autocratic but perpetual constitution, king and (military) tradition, that would make Germany one of the leading economical and military world powers in the next half century. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    Germany was not unified, yet, as the southern states were still separate. Bismarckļæ½s` most opportunistic point was when he provoked a war with France he done this by editing a telegram from essaybank.co.uk from the King to the French. He edited it so that it sounded as if the king insulted the French.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    As the workers became more radicalized and joined the KPD in larger numbers, the middle classes grew apprehensive at the thought of a communist revolution. Small businessmen resented big business and big labor. As the depression progressed from 1930 to 1932, the middle classes, like the workers, tended to become radicalized.

  1. To what extent did the unification of Germany depend upon "the strengths of the ...

    1860 Prussia already had the edge over Austria with more reserves in the army and superior weaponry. This strong military made Prussia the ideal candidate to unify Germany and benefited them politically as other countries become aware of the threat they posed.

  2. “How significant was Bismarck in securing the unification of Germany 1862 – 1871?”

    The final chapter in the unification of Germany came in the form of the war against France, in which Bismarck used the Hohenzollern candidature and more importantly the Ems telegram as a tool to provoke the country. By allying with the southern states Bismarck had effectively united them against a

  1. Was New Liberalism the most important factor behind the Liberal Government's Welfare Reforms in ...

    However, cynical though it is, most of the reforms also acted in the interest of national efficiency, and so the state of the nation on an international scale was a big incentive to introduce collectivist policies, if not the biggest.

  2. The Role of Bismarck in the German Confederation

    Austria would be isolated, due to its protectionist policies, not wanting to join the Zollverein, which had slowly developed as a national economic union, unifying currency or a system of weights and measures. Through the whole economic success, created by the Zollverein, Prussia was able to extend its power virtually

  1. "In the period 1871-1890 Bismarck was better at crushing his opponents than at producing ...

    Each of these policies would lead Germany ever closer to becoming one united country. His policy on finance meant that not only could the individual states such as Bavaria and Prussia sort their own finances but they could also be ruled centrally from Berlin, edging the states financially closer to unification.

  2. Communism vs Liberalism

    Based on this, I think that a communistic society will not encourage diversity, and will therefore be dull and extremely predictable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work