• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“Bismarck detested liberal western ideologies because they eroded God – given order” Explain Bismarck’s views on liberalism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

YEAR 11 MODERN HISTORY, TOPIC ESSAY - CASE STUDY BISMARCK. 2. "Bismarck detested liberal western ideologies because they eroded God - given order" Explain Bismarck's views on liberalism. "By his statesmanship the frontier fringed with cannon, disappeared from within the limits of the father land. No longer now German seeks to take the life of his brother German. What Bismarck has done to Germany, still one greater had to the human race." Indeed a great man. Why the constant anti-liberalism throughout his years, though liberalism had almost achieved his aim, several times before he did, then? I will justify Bismarck's so called practical-dictatorship and point out, and agree, using many extracts, the problems of liberalism. I will also, along the way, exonerate and justify, Bismarck's methods of achievement, and disprove the bourgeoisie claim of Bismarck being an oppressor or dictator. Bismarck came to be the pivot of government, but within a constitutional framework, the many claims of dictatorship such as: "He had appointed a ministry of clerks out of the Government Offices, who do as ...read more.

Middle

Bismarck was a political realist (Realpolitik), who understood the techniques of diplomatic maneuver and how and when to use force. "Only a monarchial government possessing full authority to the army and diplomacy could carry out an effective foreign policy, being a nation situated in the middle of Europe. Insular England could afford democracy; Germany could not" Maybe this was the long term thinking when King Wilhelm rejected the offer of crown of the proposed democratic-liberal Germany. Were the liberal unification of 1850, to have succeeded, with a unification from the 'bottom upwards', this would surely have resulted in a weak, disillusioned, eventually civil-strife nation, like many of the small nations of the Bund. "The fundamental error of policy of those days was that people fancied they could attain through publicists, parliamentary or diplomatic hypocrisies results which could be had only by war or readiness to fight; in such shape, that they seemed forced upon our virtuous moderation as a reward for the oratical demonstrations of our 'German sentiment'. ...read more.

Conclusion

I agree that Prussia had become the destined nation to unify Germany, (as Wilhelm once said, we were born betrothed to Germany's unity). Of Austro-Hungary's 36million people, ONLY 6million were German, while of Prussia's 16million, 14 were German, who sounds like they are interested in benefiting the German unity? Austria had no right to lead the Confederacy into unity, as they were a multicultural, aristocratic, worn, racially strifed, Jewish state, that was purely bourgeois (not the Marxist defined 'bourgeoisie'). I disagree that Germany's unifying completely, was just Prussian expansionism. Prussia (Bismarck) led, having proved with his seldom yet powerfully military might, yet with often diplomatic restraint, rescuing not only Prussian militarism (dwindling because of the constant revolutionary activities), but "Perpetuated that subaltern spirit in German public life that was its natural concomitant." Bismarck restored complete nationalism saving the smaller states from the slow-down, inefficiency and deceit of complete democratic-liberalism, of which not even the USA had yet mastered, and after having proved its success, installed an autocratic but perpetual constitution, king and (military) tradition, that would make Germany one of the leading economical and military world powers in the next half century. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    Germany was not unified, yet, as the southern states were still separate. Bismarckļæ½s` most opportunistic point was when he provoked a war with France he done this by editing a telegram from essaybank.co.uk from the King to the French. He edited it so that it sounded as if the king insulted the French.

  2. Otto von Bismarck and his Policies.

    Once again a war was avoided with Bismarck's intervention, but his efforts could not reconstitute the league. He then negotiated a separate secret treaty with Russia, while maintaining the 1879 accord with Austria-Hungary. Between 1870 and 1890 Bismarck earned the respect of European leaders for his earnest efforts in behalf of peace.

  1. "In the period 1871-1890 Bismarck was better at crushing his opponents than at producing ...

    I feel that although he was successful in crushing his opponents here he was better at introducing constructive policies to strengthen German economy and Germany as a country. Even from the 19th century Germany showed the signs of moving toward fascism.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    The Reich Propaganda Office printed standard posters and pamphlets for all districts and distributed patriotic and party movies. Recognizing the need for effective orators at all levels, including small villages, the NSDAP established a Speakers' School for the training of propaganda speakers.

  1. Communism vs Liberalism

    Based on this, I think that a communistic society will not encourage diversity, and will therefore be dull and extremely predictable.

  2. Was New Liberalism the most important factor behind the Liberal Government's Welfare Reforms in ...

    Recruitment for the Boer War of 1898 highlighted how poor the nation's health was, when one third of the population were unfit to fight. Furthermore, Britain struggled to defeat the Boers, despite being a big, imperial nation, and them a poor, insignificant force.

  1. The Role of Bismarck in the German Confederation

    A "national representation elected in all the German lands" was created in the Vorparlament, which had replaced the old Frankfurt Diet of 1815, with the new Frankfurt assembly, which was intending to "establish a united Germany under a constitutional monarch who would rule through an elected parliament."

  2. To what extent did the unification of Germany depend upon "the strengths of the ...

    Railways were also built for transportation of goods and future movements of troops. During the industrialisation Prussia's exports increased whilst Austria's decreased. Prussia's economic position had improved before the appointment of Bismarck and Prussian leadership had been successful in increasing their dominance by taking advantage of the strength of their economy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work