• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“Bismarck detested liberal western ideologies because they eroded God – given order” Explain Bismarck’s views on liberalism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

YEAR 11 MODERN HISTORY, TOPIC ESSAY - CASE STUDY BISMARCK. 2. "Bismarck detested liberal western ideologies because they eroded God - given order" Explain Bismarck's views on liberalism. "By his statesmanship the frontier fringed with cannon, disappeared from within the limits of the father land. No longer now German seeks to take the life of his brother German. What Bismarck has done to Germany, still one greater had to the human race." Indeed a great man. Why the constant anti-liberalism throughout his years, though liberalism had almost achieved his aim, several times before he did, then? I will justify Bismarck's so called practical-dictatorship and point out, and agree, using many extracts, the problems of liberalism. I will also, along the way, exonerate and justify, Bismarck's methods of achievement, and disprove the bourgeoisie claim of Bismarck being an oppressor or dictator. Bismarck came to be the pivot of government, but within a constitutional framework, the many claims of dictatorship such as: "He had appointed a ministry of clerks out of the Government Offices, who do as ...read more.

Middle

Bismarck was a political realist (Realpolitik), who understood the techniques of diplomatic maneuver and how and when to use force. "Only a monarchial government possessing full authority to the army and diplomacy could carry out an effective foreign policy, being a nation situated in the middle of Europe. Insular England could afford democracy; Germany could not" Maybe this was the long term thinking when King Wilhelm rejected the offer of crown of the proposed democratic-liberal Germany. Were the liberal unification of 1850, to have succeeded, with a unification from the 'bottom upwards', this would surely have resulted in a weak, disillusioned, eventually civil-strife nation, like many of the small nations of the Bund. "The fundamental error of policy of those days was that people fancied they could attain through publicists, parliamentary or diplomatic hypocrisies results which could be had only by war or readiness to fight; in such shape, that they seemed forced upon our virtuous moderation as a reward for the oratical demonstrations of our 'German sentiment'. ...read more.

Conclusion

I agree that Prussia had become the destined nation to unify Germany, (as Wilhelm once said, we were born betrothed to Germany's unity). Of Austro-Hungary's 36million people, ONLY 6million were German, while of Prussia's 16million, 14 were German, who sounds like they are interested in benefiting the German unity? Austria had no right to lead the Confederacy into unity, as they were a multicultural, aristocratic, worn, racially strifed, Jewish state, that was purely bourgeois (not the Marxist defined 'bourgeoisie'). I disagree that Germany's unifying completely, was just Prussian expansionism. Prussia (Bismarck) led, having proved with his seldom yet powerfully military might, yet with often diplomatic restraint, rescuing not only Prussian militarism (dwindling because of the constant revolutionary activities), but "Perpetuated that subaltern spirit in German public life that was its natural concomitant." Bismarck restored complete nationalism saving the smaller states from the slow-down, inefficiency and deceit of complete democratic-liberalism, of which not even the USA had yet mastered, and after having proved its success, installed an autocratic but perpetual constitution, king and (military) tradition, that would make Germany one of the leading economical and military world powers in the next half century. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    Bismarck then pressured the southern German states into unification by saying that if any Kings or Dukes opposed it then they would be overthrown. The last thing he had to do was persuade the King William, he done this by getting King Ludwig of Bavaria to offer Bismarck the throne

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Beginning in 1928, the "Great Coalition," which included the left-wing Social Democrats and the conservative People's Party (DVP), had governed Germany. This unlikely combination worked largely because of the economic recovery and the political acumen of the DVP leader Gustav Stresemann, the primary architect of Germany's progress between 1924 and 1929.

  1. Otto von Bismarck and his Policies.

    Because he feared that the dissolution of the Habsburg monarchy would lead to Russian expansion into central Europe, he sought the alliance to gain leverage in Vienna. He steadfastly used it to prevent a war in the Balkans. In addition, he did not want seven million Austro-German Catholics seeking admission to the empire.

  2. To what extent did the unification of Germany depend upon "the strengths of the ...

    The strong economy made Prussia increasingly relied upon by other German states for things such as trade and Keynes argues that without Prussia's solid economy, "the German nation would have been a mere shell". Prussia's military was also ever increasing and strengthening, as a result of economic development and by

  1. "In the period 1871-1890 Bismarck was better at crushing his opponents than at producing ...

    As the largest single party there they felt they should have much more power in deciding how their country should be run. This feeling was fuelled in 1874 when Bismarck introduced a law stating that the minimum size of the army would be 400,000, which would be automatically finance by the government each year.

  2. Communism vs Liberalism

    Based on this, I think that a communistic society will not encourage diversity, and will therefore be dull and extremely predictable.

  1. Was New Liberalism the most important factor behind the Liberal Government's Welfare Reforms in ...

    However, cynical though it is, most of the reforms also acted in the interest of national efficiency, and so the state of the nation on an international scale was a big incentive to introduce collectivist policies, if not the biggest.

  2. The Role of Bismarck in the German Confederation

    into account for without this the German nation would haven been a mere shell." The Zollverein created in 1834, was a continuation of the Prussian Customs Union, and was aiming for "the isolation of Austria, not only economically but also politically."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work