• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“Evaluate the relative importance of imperialism, the arms’ race and the failure of diplomacy in causing the First World War”

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Internal Assessment The Origins of World War One "Evaluate the relative importance of imperialism, the arms' race and the failure of diplomacy in causing the First World War" Jens Vall´┐Ż November 19, 2001 I.B. History HL I Enthusiastic German soldiers march through the streets of Berlin on their way to the front at the beginning of World War I Table of Contents Introduction.........................................................3 Body 1. Imperialism........................................................4 2. The arms' race....................................................5 3. The failure of diplomacy........................................6 Conclusion...........................................................7 Bibliography.........................................................8 The Origins of World War One "Evaluate the relative importance of imperialism, the arms' race and the failure of diplomacy in causing the First World War" Introduction Historians are still today debating on what actually caused World War One. This is because the actual origin was a combination of many different factors. Short-term as well as long-term causes influenced the outfall of events, however some are more important than others. What is mainly agreed on1 is that Germany was the nation most to blame, however most of the more influential nations of Europe were somehow involved in the conflict. England, France, Russia, and Austria-Hungary didn't "stumble" into the war like Germany, but they all played an important role. ...read more.

Middle

With Germany becoming a significant power after 1872, the European balance of power was tipped off. This triggered an arms' race between the leading nations, France, England, Germany, Russia, and Austria-Hungary. With vast amounts of industries being brought in from colonies and produced within Europe, the countries were able to produce great amounts of war material. Especially the continental armies of Germany and Russia were competing in numbers. As Russia was becoming an industrial nation, it wouldn't take many years for her to surpass match the might of the German army (if not the superb efficiency and leadership). Therefore the German military leaders, under pressure from the Triple Entente8, had to calculate the risks of war. The conclusion came to be that if a war was to come between Germany and Russia, then rather sooner than later.9 Germany's Weltpolitik aimed to turn Germany into an overseas empire. In order to achieve this Germany would need a considerable navy to compete with Britain. Combined with the economic pride of the German people, the German government embarked on the task to build a respectable navy. This would both help Germany defend overseas interests in for example Africa, and also as a defense against the mighty British navy in the North Sea. ...read more.

Conclusion

The arms' race created strong military tension; the many alliances pushed off the balance of power and further accelerated the arms' race, and the imperialist ideas influenced the decision making of the military leaders in critical situations. The situation created in Europe was not to last for very long, and maybe was the only way to achieve a more stable balance between the great nations. One can question the fact if war could have been avoided, but it is very hard to determine as so many different factors influenced the course of events. Many historians actually believe that war is the ultimate test of mankind to lead the evolution of strong nations and end the reign of weaker ones. In some ways it makes sense considering that Austro-Hungarian Empire consequently came to an end, and many other changes could be seen on the European map after the Great War. Germany was forced down to her knees and lost much territory to France and Russia, however she managed to regain her strength in such a way that she eventually invaded most of Europe thirty years later.13 Therefore the relative importance of the three evaluated origins is that they all combined and pushed the European powers into the cataclysmic war that defined the end of the Old World. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Free essay

    To what extent did the nuclear arms race make the world a more dangerous ...

    3 star(s)

    However the promise of mutually assured destruction (MAD) was the perfect deterrent and the threat of nuclear war was to be the grounds for peaceful co-existence. The idea that less nuclear weapons should be produced instead of more powerful nuclear weapons.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * The commander of the US forces, General Pershing, generously allowed his troops to be used wherever they were needed. This gave Marshal Foch, the Allied commander, reinforcements which he could use as he wished. * The repeated attacks in April, May and June 1918 were an effort to finish

  1. British Imperialism in India.

    India had passed to be from a sphere of influence to a protectorate. The company had gotten very big and it started collecting taxes in India. If some local regions refused to pay taxes the company would force them. The company had its own army consisting of mostly sepoys, or Indian soldiers, lead by British officers.

  2. How Significant were the Normandy landings in Defeating Germany in World War Two?

    the French resistance who helped prepare for D-Day and also the British bombed Calais four times as much as they did Normandy to give Hitler the impression they were invading at Calais rather than Normandy. Therefore, Hitler sent more troops to defend Calais and this was completely unnecessary.

  1. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    More than 50% of working people began to keep allotments. These were part of the 'Dig for Victory' campaign. By 1943 there were 1,400,000 allotments in Britain. Rationing had a profound effect on government policy. Before it had been believed that it was impossible to make major changes to the nation's health.

  2. American History.

    gov't the power to build roads/canals]. - Congress viewed the plan as a way of unifying the country, and most of the program was enacted in 1816: the Second Back of the United States was chartered, the Tariff of 1816 was passed, and funds were appropriated for the extension of

  1. The Role of Alfred von Tirpitz in the Anglo- German Naval Race.

    when the German fleet was not yet strong enough to deter the British fleet, and might be destroyed in a preventative blow. This led Tirpitz to advise cautious diplomacy towards Britain until the fleet was ready.9 Finally, "Alliance value" was the notion that a strong fleet would make Germany an

  2. How Stable Was the Tsarist Autocracy in 1914?

    Dismantling the commune would in itself be a major barrier to agricultural improvement, and "for the vast majority, the option of leaving the commune held little attraction and resistance to Stolypin was fierce." (Acton) Few left it and few new useful ideas came out of those who had.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work