• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“Hitler’s foreign policy successes between 1936 and 1939 rested on his remarkable tactical skills and ability to exploit his opponents weaknesses.” Discuss this view.

Extracts from this document...


"Hitler's foreign policy successes between 1936 and 1939 rested on his remarkable tactical skills and ability to exploit his opponents weaknesses." Discuss this view. It is certain that Hitler's tactical skills and ability to exploit weaknesses shown by opponents was a key part of his successes from 1936 to 1939. But I don't agree that they are solely the cause for his successes, more just a part of the overall cause of success. Some of the actions undertaken by Hitler would surely have been attempted by any authoritarian government that came to power. Such as the 1933 withdrawal of Germany from the League of Nations and Disarmament Conference. Whether or not they would have successfully achieved these ambitions or not is another matter, but they would have at least been attempted. Hitler's foreign policy was mainly concerned with revision and expansion. Revision of the Treaty of Versailles which Hitler hated immensely, and expansion of Germany to include all German people; also for Lebensraum. His 1936 to 1939 successes were mainly concerned with revisionism, whilst silently building the foundations for expansionism. ...read more.


The three countries didn't necessarily regard the re-occupation as aggressive because at this time Germany was still militarily weak. Plus a year earlier Germany had peacefully negotiated the return of the Saar land. So Britain, France and Italy let this go Hitler's way. This episode in Hitler's plans was, as we can see, successful. The reasons for his success here though are not entirely down to his own tactical skills and his ability to exploit events to his advantage but also the policies of foreign countries, which Hitler couldn't choose. Events that were taking place (Italies invasion of Abyssinia) and the policies of the main foreign countries (Britain and France's policy of appeasement) played right into his hands. The fact that Hitler could then use these events to produce the outcome he most desired is what made him successful between 1936 and 1939. Another example of Hitler successfully carrying out his foreign policy is of course the 1939 'Anchluss' of Germany with Austria. Which bridged the gap between revisionism and expansionism. He had now almost completed the revision of Versailles but for the destruction of the Polish Corridor, and he had taken his first step towards expansion. ...read more.


Therefore there were no objections thrown to Hitler. His timing had once again been spot on. With these two examples of Hitler being successful in his foreign policy aims. I can now look and see whether or not the successes were totally because of his tactical and exploitational skills or not. The Rhineland and Austria scenarios show Hitler as very tactically aware. He has a plan that he carries out in full but only when the time was right. He made the right time by doing deals with Britain and Italy peacefully. So that the other countries got into a frame of mind that Germany was doing everything by the book and peacefully. Hitler then exploited his opponents' mindset by taking what he wanted and making it look like it was the right thing to be doing and would be better for everybody. But at times he was also helped by events taking place that were out of his hands, such as France's political problems. However, he incorporated this into his plan to make the whole situation easier for himself and so exploited it. Therefore I think that Hitler's successes in the 1936/9 period were about 90% down to his tactical and exploitational skills. Mark Wicks 11-12-01 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    John Lowe argues that the 'Vienna Statesmen cannot be criticised for ignoring the (alleged) national aspirations of the small masses, which scarcely existed in 1815.'15 There was little demand for them and certainly the unification of Italy and Germany was a dream to very few at the time, such as students.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    At the same time, he had to conciliate the militants within the SA who wanted action. For the time being, Hitler managed to keep the SA in line by personal appeals for loyalty and vague promises of the SA as a reservoir of the future national army.

  1. "Hitler's foreign policy successes between 1936 and 1939 rested on his remarkable tactical skills ...

    There was a small amount of protest from Britain and France, but as Hitler had presumed, they were unwilling to take any real action against him. France was war weary; Britain was suffering economically and concerned with the defence of their empire in the east.

  2. "Nazi policy towards the Jews up to 1939 was uncoordinated and erratic."

    It is at this point that German contempt towards the Jews can be separated from the most of Europe at this time. It could be argued that with the implementation of the Nuremburg Laws came the start of true racial prejudice and the beginning of a systematic destruction of the Jewish race.

  1. "In the period 1871-1890 Bismarck was better at crushing his opponents than at producing ...

    This said that every seven years the Reichstag would be able to vote on military spending. Bismarck didn't like the threat posed to him by the National Liberals and wanted rid of them. In 1878 his chance came. Europe had gone into depression so many countries had introduced protection on their trade.

  2. Explain the successes of Mussolinis foreign policy up to 1939.

    He also saw it as an opportunity to enhance his prestige and power at home. He would organise dramatic entrances to international conferences, as when he raced across Lake Maggiore in a flotilla of speedboats to Locarno.

  1. How far was Mussolinis ability to secure and increase his power in the period ...

    Italy, rather than resulting in the 600,000 soldiers killed in WWI; Mussolini gained a reputation for heading a party that was effective and decisive. Wishing to secure his power further, Mussolini pushed forward the Acerbo Law in 1923, resulting in the Socialist party showing further signs of weakness; it could

  2. How far do you agree with the view that it was only in Foreign ...

    The Locarno Pact of 1925 witnessed an international security pact for Germany?s western frontiers. Germany gained much more of Locarno than it conceded and it seemed that the historic quarrel between France and Germany had finally been buried. In 1926, Germany was invited to join the League of Nation and was immediately recognised as a permanent member.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work