• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“Hitler’s foreign policy successes between 1936 and 1939 rested on his remarkable tactical skills and ability to exploit his opponents weaknesses.” Discuss this view.

Extracts from this document...


"Hitler's foreign policy successes between 1936 and 1939 rested on his remarkable tactical skills and ability to exploit his opponents weaknesses." Discuss this view. It is certain that Hitler's tactical skills and ability to exploit weaknesses shown by opponents was a key part of his successes from 1936 to 1939. But I don't agree that they are solely the cause for his successes, more just a part of the overall cause of success. Some of the actions undertaken by Hitler would surely have been attempted by any authoritarian government that came to power. Such as the 1933 withdrawal of Germany from the League of Nations and Disarmament Conference. Whether or not they would have successfully achieved these ambitions or not is another matter, but they would have at least been attempted. Hitler's foreign policy was mainly concerned with revision and expansion. Revision of the Treaty of Versailles which Hitler hated immensely, and expansion of Germany to include all German people; also for Lebensraum. His 1936 to 1939 successes were mainly concerned with revisionism, whilst silently building the foundations for expansionism. ...read more.


The three countries didn't necessarily regard the re-occupation as aggressive because at this time Germany was still militarily weak. Plus a year earlier Germany had peacefully negotiated the return of the Saar land. So Britain, France and Italy let this go Hitler's way. This episode in Hitler's plans was, as we can see, successful. The reasons for his success here though are not entirely down to his own tactical skills and his ability to exploit events to his advantage but also the policies of foreign countries, which Hitler couldn't choose. Events that were taking place (Italies invasion of Abyssinia) and the policies of the main foreign countries (Britain and France's policy of appeasement) played right into his hands. The fact that Hitler could then use these events to produce the outcome he most desired is what made him successful between 1936 and 1939. Another example of Hitler successfully carrying out his foreign policy is of course the 1939 'Anchluss' of Germany with Austria. Which bridged the gap between revisionism and expansionism. He had now almost completed the revision of Versailles but for the destruction of the Polish Corridor, and he had taken his first step towards expansion. ...read more.


Therefore there were no objections thrown to Hitler. His timing had once again been spot on. With these two examples of Hitler being successful in his foreign policy aims. I can now look and see whether or not the successes were totally because of his tactical and exploitational skills or not. The Rhineland and Austria scenarios show Hitler as very tactically aware. He has a plan that he carries out in full but only when the time was right. He made the right time by doing deals with Britain and Italy peacefully. So that the other countries got into a frame of mind that Germany was doing everything by the book and peacefully. Hitler then exploited his opponents' mindset by taking what he wanted and making it look like it was the right thing to be doing and would be better for everybody. But at times he was also helped by events taking place that were out of his hands, such as France's political problems. However, he incorporated this into his plan to make the whole situation easier for himself and so exploited it. Therefore I think that Hitler's successes in the 1936/9 period were about 90% down to his tactical and exploitational skills. Mark Wicks 11-12-01 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the successes and failures of Mussolini's domestic policy.

    5 star(s)

    progression of the two other 'battles', the one for grain and the other for land, both a quest for autarky, or self-sufficiency, which would prove Italy as a successful, 'warrior nation'. Initially, the 'battle for grain' seemed to be successful, by 1930, 60 million quintals of grain was being produced

  2. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    of higher nature, not great measure for public order or the general good.'24 This therefore, was a major failure of the Vienna Settlement, and it is clear more could have been done to reform Europe, indicating that the failures outweighed the successes.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Students memorized set speeches and rehearsed answers to questions in front of mirrors. Two thousand speakers were trained in 1929 and 1930 alone. The program was expanded with the establishment by Fritz Reinhardt of a correspondence school. Students memorized a simple speech written by Reinhardt, who also corrected speeches written by the students themselves.

  2. "Hitler's foreign policy successes between 1936 and 1939 rested on his remarkable tactical skills ...

    There was a small amount of protest from Britain and France, but as Hitler had presumed, they were unwilling to take any real action against him. France was war weary; Britain was suffering economically and concerned with the defence of their empire in the east.

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    Napoleon was victorious in the epic, two-day clash of artillery. Casualties on both sides were enormous. Napoleon lost at least 32,000 men, while the Austrians retreated with 80,000 survivors. * Peace was dictated to Austria at Schonbrunn. It was Napoleon's last great victory. The signs of French problems were disturbing.

  2. Was Hitler a weak dictator?

    Social policies like the one that women were only meant for 'Children, Church and Kitchen' weren't good for the boom Hitler wanted for his industry. Before Nazi period women were 30% of the worker force of Germany, they were prohibited of working or engaging in professional activities.

  1. How far was Mussolinis ability to secure and increase his power in the period ...

    Prime Minister, and the passing of the Acerbo law in 1923 was a key example of this. This bill would permit the party that obtained the most votes in a general election to take two-thirds of the seats in the Chamber, provided they received at least 25% of votes.

  2. How far do you agree with the view that it was only in Foreign ...

    However, the concrete gains from his diplomacy were limited: no formal agreement existed changing the demilitarisation terms of Versailles and he did not gain French withdrawal from the Ruhr by 1925. Significantly, his policies failed to rally support domestically. Many Germans saw Stresemann?s policy of fulfilment as unpatriotic.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work