• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“Popular nationalist sentiment; military superiority; economic power; the genius of Bismarck.” Which of these factors seems to you to be the most important in the eventual unification of Germany between 1863 and 1871?

Extracts from this document...


"Popular nationalist sentiment; military superiority; economic power; the genius of Bismarck." Which of these factors seems to you to be the most important in the eventual unification of Germany between 1863 and 1871? 'Germany' came into existence in 1871, unified by a number of different influences and it is difficult to pinpoint a solitary cause. All of the above factors are significant in their own way and played a major role in the events leading up to the unification of the German states. Popular nationalist feelings are proposed to be one of the major reasons for the unification of Germany. German national feeling revived after the war scare of 1859, a development which was reflected in the establishment of the Nationalverein. This organised expression of national consciousness led the way in the 1860s in calling for German unification under the leadership of Prussia. The weakness of the Nationalverein was that its support was limited; at its height it only had 25,000 members, mostly from the middle class professions. ...read more.


However, France and Austria were also notably expanding economically therefore economic strength alone does not explain the victories of Prussia's armies in those wars. This suggests that there was in fact something distinct about the Prussian army, as the wars of 1864, 1866 and 1870-1 all resulted in decisive victories. The victories were not due to the Prussian army out numbering the French forces or the Danish army but organisation and planning. The Prussian Chief of Staff, Von Moltke, made a major contribution to Prussia's military victories through the preparation and planning which he had instigated since the early 1860s. The technological gap between the Prussian army and its adversaries also played a part in the victories. On particular importance in this context was the quality of the weaponry deployed by the respective armies. Prussia had introduced the breech-loading Dreyse gun in 1843 when other armies were still using the musket. They also used artillery with rifled barrels, which had far larger range and accuracy. ...read more.


The war of 1866, with Austria left the Prussian Empire stronger than ever, in hindsight it seems that the war was in fact planned step by step by Bismarck and he was successful in this policy. The new balance of power in Europe made the French vary and this led to diplomatic tensions. War with France was the final step on the road to German unification. Bismarck exploited the tensions between the two powers to arouse national feeling in Germany and to persuade the southern states to accept closer military co-operation with Prussia. To conclude all of the above elements are important in their own ways, all of which are inter-linked to create the conditions of 1871 for the states of Germany to unite under the leadership of Prussia. The weaknesses of the other states of Germany and the unconcern of the rest of Europe also played an important role. However, the economic and military strength of Prussia was the most significant reason for German unification and without Prussia's strength a German state could not have been achieved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. 'In the context of the period 1715-1815 to what extent were economic factors the ...

    Many historians have since taken either side of this debate. For example, Jules Michelet believed that the Revolution set out to liberate the French, but on the other hand Denis Richet condemns this viewpoint, taking particular issue with de Tocqueville's work.

  2. Why did Prussia rather than Austria lead the unification of Germany?

    the day of the Battle of K�niggr�tz - the final victory. The Prussian liberals lost much of their support in favour for their new nationalist fighter, Bismarck. The crown party had silenced the Liberals and cleared the way for further policy.

  1. To what extent was German Unification driven by primarily economic forces?

    What the Austria suffered from most was the lack of resources compared to the other great powers especially Prussia. Prussia was graced with much more in terms of coal and iron than the Austrians and therefore could establish a much better and richer economy.

  2. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    The course of action which he did take, namely letting Austria simply crawl away to lick its wounds, gained more influence for Prussia through the North German Confederation, than would have occurred had Prussia actually invaded the Austro-Hungarian Empire. It would have taken more man power and time to have

  1. Hitlers Germany

    that if only the will was there any problem could be solved. Schacht, to whose advice he refused to listen and whose admiration was reluctant, says of him: 'Hitler often did find astonishingly simple solutions for problems which had seemed to others insoluble. He had a genius for invention. .

  2. To what extent was the contribution of Bismarck to German unification the most important ...

    Already he sees the duchies as a way to rid Prussia of Austria- to become closer to being independent. Even when control was decided for the duchies he has out smarted the Austrians and gained control of both duchies even though he officially he only controls Schleswig.

  1. To what extent was Bismarck in control of the direction Germany's Foreign Policy took ...

    Thus the Treaty led to better Russo-German understanding, and at least temporarily lowered the chance of a Russo-French alliance. The complicated set of treaties and alliances show Bismarck to be in control and carefully planning for all eventualities. James Joll supports this view; "Bismarck needed to ensure that France remained

  2. To what extent did the unification of Germany depend upon "the strengths of the ...

    This meant that Prussia had influence in the German states and Austria, were cut-off. It was at this point that the Austrian delegate to the assembly of the confederation remarked, "Prussia is now taking over the actual leadership of Germany's policy, Austria's leadership being merely formal" although, at this time Austria still had political influence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work