• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12

“The First World War was the result of a badly mismanaged Balkan Crisis in the summer of 1914 rather than the product of long-standing rivalries between the Great Powers.” Assess the truth of this opinion on the causes of the outbreak of World W

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1 2 "The First World War was the result of a badly mismanaged Balkan Crisis in the summer of 1914 rather than the product of long-standing rivalries between the Great Powers." Assess the truth of this opinion on the causes of the outbreak of World War One. I feel, in my opinion that this statement is incorrect. To say that the First World War started by any one reason would be unjust. The war came about due to a number of diplomatic crises and tensions, which accumulated before the Balkan crisis of 1914. If anything the First World War was well overdue, and should have started well before 1914, if you take into account the reasons, causes and tensions before then. To put the whole blame on the Balkan crisis would be wrong as there were many events which added diplomatic tension between the countries involved in the war, leading up to the Balkan crisis, and for that reason I disagree with the statement in question. There are many causes to the First World War, one of which is found in Germany and her World Policy. Weltpolitik is the direct German translation of world policy which was a policy of German expansion further than Central Europe. Germany had found a transformation, since the Franco-Prussian war of 1871 and the new Germany was united. Germany wanted to gain a worldwide empire, much like Britain. By expanding, Germany would have been seen as another great power in Europe and would have meant they could be as strong as the British. ...read more.

Middle

Due to defeat in the Russo-Japanese war, the Russian government felt that they would be extremely vulnerable if they were to be attacked. As a result the Russian government increased their army and trained them to be more efficient. This race is a large threat to all the powers in Europe. As one country arms, it gives the impression to the other nations that they are about to attack a country or that a war is looming. In addition, the introduction of the Schlieffen plan caused immense tension between France, Germany and Russia. The plan was devised by Alfred Von Schlieffen in 1892. The plan was made after France and Russia agreed an alliance. The plan was to knock out France by invading Belgium and by then go back and defeat the slow mobilising Russians on the other front. This promoted the creation of Plan 17 from France and Plan B from Russia. Plan 17 stated that it would be more effective for the French to defend themselves by attacking. Plan B consisted of the Russian Army invading Poland through into Germany to relieve pressure from France. The arms race and especially the military plans caused an unpeaceful feeling which could have resulted in war. All nations were preparing for war and tensions were rising. The poor state of which Europe was at its worst could have been to do with Bismark not being in power. Bismark managed to use his diplomatic skills to build good international relations with all the other nations in Europe. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Balkans also presented the literal cause of the First World War. On 28th June 1914 Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated in Sarajevo by Serb terrorists. Franz Ferdinand was the Heir to the Austria-Hungarian throne. The assassination was carried out by the "Black Hand" movement. Austria-Hungary accused Serbia of the assassination and then Europe was at war. The Balkans' crisis of the summer of 1914 was but a small cause to the outbreak of war. The crisis occurred in 1914 and therefore if I were to agree with the statement in question, it would mean that events and actions before 1914 had no part to play in the cause of the First World War. This is wrong. The war started because of the many events occurring in the run up to 1914. In my opinion the cause of the First World War, was Germany and her world policy, that is her obsession with challenging Britain's Navy and supremacy in Europe. If Germany did not expand and try and become a great power, then the balance of power would have been constant and uninterrupted. However, it would be wrong for me to blame the whole war on Germany because even if Germany did not exist, you would still have Russia fighting with Austria-Hungary over Serbia and the Balkans. The blame cannot be solely handed to one country or one event. The war occurred due to a catalogue of events and issues which accumulated in to the First World War. WORD COUNT 2,559 ?? ?? ?? ?? 11 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    In the 1909 Budget, the British government provided for the building of the eight ships that the public demanded, but by then the Naval Arms Race had in fact been won. Why did the assassination at Sarajevo lead to the outbreak of war in 1914?

  2. How far was Germany responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914?

    they were ready to strike, once France was defeated her allies would offer little resistance, French fortifications against Germany were impregnable, so the German army must make a lightning strike through Belgium and Luxembourg and attack Paris. This was obviously a very aggressive plan by Germany.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    It must and will exert every energy to restore the loss of power which the situation has produced." In fact, news of the bomb's development simply widened the gulf further between the superpowers, highlighting the mistrust that existed between them, with sources of antagonism increasing far faster than efforts at cooperation.

  2. To what extent were germany to blame for the outbreak of ww1

    The Moroccan 'independent' Government provided the German Foreign officer an opportunity for action. The French sent troops to Fez to resolve anti - foreign riots.

  1. Which Country Was Most To Blame for WWII - Italy, Germany or Japan?

    In China, the communists joined up with the Nationalists, who wanted to drive the Japanese out of North China. In response to this, Japan signed the Anti-Comintern Pact with Germany, which brought them closer together, and took Japan further from the Western Powers.

  2. To What extent was Germany Responsible for the outbreak of World War One?

    She went to war in 1914 to break out of a hostile enciclement of her own devising. Germany was not only weak abroad, her domestic situation was also rapidly spiralling out of control. Germany had gone from being a small collection of states to a powerful industrial giant in an exceptionally short period of time.

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    MacArthur took his orders from Truman, not the UN. Truman and his advisers had become convinced of the Domino Theory: unless the US acted, communism would spread from country of South East Asia to another. How did superpower involvement influence the nature and course of the war?

  2. "The main cause of the American civil war was undeniably slavery". Assess the ...

    Some historians have obviously argued against this view. Avery Craven has stated in his book 'Coming of the Civil War' "it was a needless disaster". This is implying that the war was not inevitable. When discussing politics the 'inevitability' of the Civil War is highly topical.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work