• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

“The First World War was the result of a badly mismanaged Balkan Crisis in the summer of 1914 rather than the product of long-standing rivalries between the Great Powers.” Assess the truth of this opinion on the causes of the outbreak of World W

Extracts from this document...


1 2 "The First World War was the result of a badly mismanaged Balkan Crisis in the summer of 1914 rather than the product of long-standing rivalries between the Great Powers." Assess the truth of this opinion on the causes of the outbreak of World War One. I feel, in my opinion that this statement is incorrect. To say that the First World War started by any one reason would be unjust. The war came about due to a number of diplomatic crises and tensions, which accumulated before the Balkan crisis of 1914. If anything the First World War was well overdue, and should have started well before 1914, if you take into account the reasons, causes and tensions before then. To put the whole blame on the Balkan crisis would be wrong as there were many events which added diplomatic tension between the countries involved in the war, leading up to the Balkan crisis, and for that reason I disagree with the statement in question. There are many causes to the First World War, one of which is found in Germany and her World Policy. Weltpolitik is the direct German translation of world policy which was a policy of German expansion further than Central Europe. Germany had found a transformation, since the Franco-Prussian war of 1871 and the new Germany was united. Germany wanted to gain a worldwide empire, much like Britain. By expanding, Germany would have been seen as another great power in Europe and would have meant they could be as strong as the British. ...read more.


Due to defeat in the Russo-Japanese war, the Russian government felt that they would be extremely vulnerable if they were to be attacked. As a result the Russian government increased their army and trained them to be more efficient. This race is a large threat to all the powers in Europe. As one country arms, it gives the impression to the other nations that they are about to attack a country or that a war is looming. In addition, the introduction of the Schlieffen plan caused immense tension between France, Germany and Russia. The plan was devised by Alfred Von Schlieffen in 1892. The plan was made after France and Russia agreed an alliance. The plan was to knock out France by invading Belgium and by then go back and defeat the slow mobilising Russians on the other front. This promoted the creation of Plan 17 from France and Plan B from Russia. Plan 17 stated that it would be more effective for the French to defend themselves by attacking. Plan B consisted of the Russian Army invading Poland through into Germany to relieve pressure from France. The arms race and especially the military plans caused an unpeaceful feeling which could have resulted in war. All nations were preparing for war and tensions were rising. The poor state of which Europe was at its worst could have been to do with Bismark not being in power. Bismark managed to use his diplomatic skills to build good international relations with all the other nations in Europe. ...read more.


The Balkans also presented the literal cause of the First World War. On 28th June 1914 Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated in Sarajevo by Serb terrorists. Franz Ferdinand was the Heir to the Austria-Hungarian throne. The assassination was carried out by the "Black Hand" movement. Austria-Hungary accused Serbia of the assassination and then Europe was at war. The Balkans' crisis of the summer of 1914 was but a small cause to the outbreak of war. The crisis occurred in 1914 and therefore if I were to agree with the statement in question, it would mean that events and actions before 1914 had no part to play in the cause of the First World War. This is wrong. The war started because of the many events occurring in the run up to 1914. In my opinion the cause of the First World War, was Germany and her world policy, that is her obsession with challenging Britain's Navy and supremacy in Europe. If Germany did not expand and try and become a great power, then the balance of power would have been constant and uninterrupted. However, it would be wrong for me to blame the whole war on Germany because even if Germany did not exist, you would still have Russia fighting with Austria-Hungary over Serbia and the Balkans. The blame cannot be solely handed to one country or one event. The war occurred due to a catalogue of events and issues which accumulated in to the First World War. WORD COUNT 2,559 ?? ?? ?? ?? 11 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    * In the USA, Truman was replaced by Eisenhower. 'Ike' was regarded as less confrontational than Truman. * Nikita Khrushchev, Stalin's successor, gave the appearance of being a more moderate ruler. o In 1955 he ended the long conflict Stalin had had with the Yugoslav leader, Tito, by accepting his right to independence.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    He intended to throw it at the Archduke's car as he drove past. Further down the road was Gavrilo Princip, who was carrying a revolver. He was going to shoot the Archduke if the bomb did not kill him. * As the Archduke's car came down Appel Quay toward the Town Hall, Cabrinovic stepped forward and threw his bomb.

  1. To what extent were germany to blame for the outbreak of ww1

    For Example France had plan 17. The Key reasoning in my opinion is that France's plan was defensive - if they had to go to War they would have a battle plan, the truth is every country had plans in the likely hood of war, but Germanys plan was entirely

  2. "The main cause of the American civil war was undeniably slavery". Assess the ...

    The Kansas and Nebraska act (1854) changed people's attitudes towards compromises in the north and south. After the Abandonment of the Missouri compromise protests appeared in the north. This act was the first to cause violence. Northerners and southerners were aroused to such passions that sectional division reached a point that precluded reconciliation.

  1. Why did the Central Powers lose the First World War?

    One the other hand, some historians may argue that even if the French were defeated the allies would have still won the war because Great Britain would be available to defend Russia and fight against the Central powers with hopefully the USA who would enter the war on Britain's side

  2. To What extent was German Foreign Policy responsible for the outbreak of general European ...

    It had to break at some stage and in 1914 it did. The alliance system that was in place for much of the start of the 20th century also contributed to the sense of inevitability. The alliances provided links across which a crisis could spread until eventually all the great European powers were involved.

  1. How Significant were the Normandy landings in Defeating Germany in World War Two?

    To analyse exactly what source is more useful than the other to the significance of D-Day I must study their flaws. Source H appears to be more of an overview than anything else. This is satisfactory if it's just for the 50th anniversary but compared with source G, with a lot more detail than itself, it is not good.

  2. Was the alliance system responsible for the outbreak of World War 1 in 1914?

    Unlike in Bismarck's time, Germany did not take the leading role in international relations, which if Bismarck had of been ruler for a longer period of time, may perhaps have changed. There were also some physical disputes that had an impact in causing WWI.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work