• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

1905 marked the culmination of the process that began in 1856. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


The 1905 revolution in Russia was seen by some, namely Alan Woods and Lenin, as a dress rehearsal for the Russian Revolution of 1917; "It was a dress rehearsal, without which the final victory of the proletariat in October 1917 would have been impossible"1. The attempted revolution in 1905 did, however, highlight the changes needed in Russia, economically, politically and socially, for her to be able to function properly as a World power. Whether the revolution in 1905 was directly linked to the events leading from 1856 is questionable, but theorists such as Karl Marx believed it to be just that. The inevitability of the revolution is stemmed from the 'theory of progression' and is used by theorists such as Leo Trotsky and Lenin; Trotsky comparing its inevitability to the inevitability of the rising sun - "The Russian revolution is inevitable and it is as inevitable as the inevitable rising of the sun"2. The Marxist theory of progression states that the revolution of 1905 was the culmination of the process that began in 1856 and was inevitable. The events following the Moscow Speech and the Russian defeat in the Crimean War all supposedly led up to the inevitable revolution in 1905. The humiliation Russia suffered after their defeat by Britain, France and Turkey and the incompetence if the Russian military indicated the need for change and was acknowledged by Alexander II in the Moscow Speech of the same year. ...read more.


Provinces due to the increase in ethnic Latvians and Estonians, the assassination of Bobrikov (a governor-general appointed by Nicholas II in 1898) and mass protest in Finland and the overwhelming opposition to Russification in none other than Russian Poland. It is safe to say that the policy of Russification was a definite faux-pas on the Tsarist government's part and did more damage to Russia than good. This implementation of Russification and other Conservative ideology was greatly responsible for the huge growth of opposition the autocratic government saw in Russia after 1881. The 'Safeguard System', implemented at the same time Russification was, gave the police and the governor-generals almost unrivalled power. With the scare of assassination still apparent, the powers given to the police and governor-generals consisted of having the authority to arrest and detain suspected extremists, fine the local press6 and even shut the press down should they prove to be too outspoken. The control of the state by the Ohkrana served as another way for Alexander III to gain more control over Russia - control that had been compromised during his father's reign. The almost instantaneous growth in control over Russia under Alexander III's rule was hugely contrasting to his father's ruling and gave the proletariat another reason to revolt; yet another link to the revolution of 1905. ...read more.


After a certain point in the process, however - the second war defeat Russia suffered - it would have become apparent that a revolution was on its way. The inevitability of it cannot have been determined until the surging growth in opposition and the huge uprising within the proletariat working classes. To call the revolution in 1905 a 'culmination' of a process is incorrect as the word 'culmination' is defined by Webster's Dictionary as "a final climactic stage"10. It is clear that the revolution in 1905 simply served as a "dress rehearsal"11 for the revolution in 1917. Ultimately, the events leading up to the revolution in 1905 could be seen as being independent of each other until a certain point at which the revolution could be forewarned. That is not to say that the revolution was inevitable, it wasn't, but it cannot be denied that once the autocracy faced enough opposition without enough being done on their part, change was sure to follow - that it was in the form of a people's revolution is irrelevant. To say that it was a 'culmination' of a process is also wrong due to the reasons stated previously. Therefore, while the revolution wasn't inevitable to begin with, there was certainly a point in the 'process' which meant that a revolution was probable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Assess the Reign of Amenhotep III

    They were depicted prominently in monuments, for example Amenhotep III's mother, Mutemweia acted as his regent early in his childhood, and is depicted as receiving Amun's ankh in the Divine Birth scenes at Luxor temple. Also, his wife, Tiye, unlike other queens was frequently present on the Pharaoh's monument in same proportions as he.

  2. How far was the Russo-Japanese war responsible for the 1905 revolution

    The share of the village land wasn't enough to keep them above the level of poverty. (It has been estimated that only 1/3 of the total area of agricultural land was given to the village communities; while more than 1/3 was kept by the state and the Imperial family, and 1/4 was still kept by the nobles.)

  1. A direct comparison of the role of central power and control during the late ...

    of overall state control in overall in comparison to an organisation such as Gosplan, however when compared to the Sovnarkhozy which was almost impossible to control centrally it is clear that the Tsarist era was one of a higher degree of power that was kept central, in the hands of the Tsars.

  2. The First English Civil War

    Her husband pressed Rupert to go to her relief. Once, too, the prince was ordered back to Oxford to furnish a travelling escort for the queen, who shortly after this, gave birth to her youngest child and returned to France.

  1. Louis XIV's fondness of war resulted his downfall

    It is clear that Louis initially sought to avoid the War of Spanish Succession (1701-1714) by signing the two partition treaties. It was Louis that suggested peace negotiations to William III, one of his biggest rivals in Europe. Both of these two sides had successfully arranged peaceful means of Spanish

  2. Assess the factors that lead to the defeat of Boudica and the Iceni in ...

    It may have been because of this that Boudica squandered her seemingly unbeatable numerical advantage and was defeated comprehensively at the battle of Watling Street. Boudica and her Iceni tribe were defeated at the Battle of Watling Street for numerous reasons and it is clear that they were no match for General Gaius Suetonius Paulinus and his Roman forces.

  1. How and why did the Bolsheviks gain power in 1917?

    another; quite effectively giving ammunition to the Bolsheviks to fuel their campaign against the Tsar. Then, using the Tsar's inability to provide for the increasing demand for a democratic socialist state, Lenin and the Bolsheviks again, with renewed vigor, continued their strong revolutionary tactics.

  2. The storming of the BAstille was the most significant event in 1789

    This also worked well, as Louis was in no position to demand of the national assembly as he could no longer rely on the army to help him out. The fall of the Bastille is significant in that it is further evidence that the army was abandoning the king.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work