• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Andrew Jackson was an effective and vigorous president, who acted upon a few key convictions,

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

I feel the statement, "Andrew Jackson was an effective and vigorous president, who acted upon a few key convictions," is a poor description of Andrew Jackson's presidency. While Andrew Jackson confronted a few major issues, such as removing some of the men that had hold been holding office for many years, about 1 in 10 men were removed. He also passed a few protective tariffs in an attempt to help the American economy. ...read more.

Middle

He had promised to fix the corrupt government, but he vetoed twelve bills during his two terms, while the six men before him had only vetoed nine bills, mostly for unconstitutional issues. President Jackson vetoed bills if they conflicted with his agenda. The tariffs he passed also had problems. They favored the North. The South would have to pay more for got with the high taxes on imported goods, and they strongly opposed them. ...read more.

Conclusion

Mostly the New York business men and bankers favored the national bank. This caused the land prices and money to inflate. When Jackson left office the next president was left with a seven year depression. As the depression became worse and wages dropped it became more sever. Andrew Jackson was not a very good president. His poor choices caused many problems for the nation during and after his terms. He fought several ideas that would have helped the nation economy. He also used his power to veto laws that would interferer with his political agenda. Even with Jackson's few political victories he was not a very effective president. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The essay is mostly focused on reasons why Jackson was a bad president when the student in fact needs to focus on both sides of the argument, because it shows they are able to think widely and understand that there ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The essay is mostly focused on reasons why Jackson was a bad president when the student in fact needs to focus on both sides of the argument, because it shows they are able to think widely and understand that there is more than one opinion on historical events. The student could improve this by devoting a whole paragraph to the two positive things they mentioned in the introduction - removing office holders and helping the economy. However, the essay doesn't wander off into other areas and stays focused on Jackson, which is good as it shows the student has enough knowledge to stick to the question.

Level of analysis

Some of the evidence used in the essay is good, such as "1 in 10 men were removed". But it isn't clear whether the student thinks this is a good thing or not. They could improve by explaining why this was significant - they could say something like "This is actually a relatively small amount of people, showing that Jackson failed in his attempt to bring in new people." At some points, the essay goes into too much detail without explaining the significance of the detail - the third paragraph doesn't start talking about the cause or the effects of Jackson's actions until the fifth sentence. The conclusion is good as it is because it reaches a judgement, showing that the student can identify a strong argument and choose it as the most important. But because the essay itself doesn't consider both sides of the argument, the conclusion is let down. This is why it is important to consider more than one interpretation and keep it up for the whole essay, or else it lets all of it down. It is important to go into detail when explaining things, but not go into detail when describing things - anyone can learn details of an event, but it takes judgement and historical knowledge to explain why they were important. "President Jackson was not a very effective president. President Jackson made many choices based upon his political goals, not for the American people..." suggests that you are only an effective president if you make choices for the American people, but doesn't say why. It would be better to explain that Jackson could be interpreted as someone who was effective at hitting his political goals, but he could also be interpreted as someone who was effective at working for the American people. You could then do a paragraph on each to show you are considering the two sides of the argument.

Quality of writing

The student repeats "President Jackson" quite a lot - there is no need to say "President" at all because it is clear who you are referring to if you say "Jackson", and the student could also say "he" more often, as repetition of "President Jackson" in nearly every sentence makes the essay sound repetitive and like a story. The sentences are also quite short, which adds to the sense that it is being told like a story (see Level of analysis section). However, the essay's quality of writing benefits from the use of technical terms like "cause", such as "This caused the land prices and money to inflate". Words like "cause" often appear in mark schemes and are better than phrases you'd find in a story, like "and then land prices and money inflated", because it shows you have a full understanding of how one event in history causes another to happen.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by lordharvey 18/04/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. How far do you agree with this description of the prosperity of the USA ...

    To counteract this, foreign governments started to place high tariffs on imported American goods. This meant that in the areas in which America was suffering over production, the consumer goods industry and agriculture, they could not export their surplus produce, this forced prices down, most notably in grain hurting the industries.

  2. Two legal codes that have influenced the U.S are The code of Hammurabi and ...

    The plebeians were very unfairly treated, having ridiculous rules such as not being able to marry a patrician and having little say in government. The patricians were indeed infringing on the civil liberties of the plebeians and thus they had such civil disabilities placed on them.

  1. How successful was Roosevelt in delivering relief, recovery and reform during the New Deal?

    The South, especially, suffered severely from the minimum-wage provisions. The act forced 500,000 black people out of work [9]. Later an investigation by Congress found out that codes were favouring big corporations while small businesses were disadvantaged (Clements, p. ). This attempt to increase purchasing power was psychologically important to keep the morale of the nation and encourage further

  2. Assess the importance of the President in the expansion of the USA from 1815-1917

    During his election, his pro-removal opinions were well known, and so it can be seen that Indian Removal was inevitable, this is supported by Grant Foreman who says ?Logically one of the first important measures to be urged by Jackson after his election was what became known as the Indian Removal Bill[3]?.

  1. 'Johnson alone bears the responsibility for the escalation of war in Vietnam in the ...

    and it has been said if we lose that war, and in so doing lose this way of freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment that those who had the most to lose did the least to prevent its happening.? And in 1965 ?We should declare war on North Vietnam.

  2. How much and why did President Truman help to promote racial equality?

    Since the end of Civil War in 1865 and the enactment of a constitutional amendment affirming universal suffrage based on race, African-Americans still faced huge obstacles in voting in political elections due to policies such as the poll tax. However, as more states made laws for making voting fairer to

  1. Research on the major Civil rights events between 1963 to 1968

    administered all of the logistic details of a mass march in the nation's capital. Purpose The march was not universally supported among civil rights activists. Some were concerned that it might turn violent, which could undermine pending Legislation and damage the international image of the movement.

  2. President Hoover and the Great Depression

    High interest rates were introduced, allegedly on the basis of protecting banks, and discouraging unreasoned lending. When it was later determined that taxes would be raised, in contradiction to Hoover's previous intention of lowering them, it was concluded by many that sensible decisions could no longer be expected to emerge from the federal government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work