• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Andrew Jackson was an effective and vigorous president, who acted upon a few key convictions,

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

I feel the statement, "Andrew Jackson was an effective and vigorous president, who acted upon a few key convictions," is a poor description of Andrew Jackson's presidency. While Andrew Jackson confronted a few major issues, such as removing some of the men that had hold been holding office for many years, about 1 in 10 men were removed. He also passed a few protective tariffs in an attempt to help the American economy. ...read more.

Middle

He had promised to fix the corrupt government, but he vetoed twelve bills during his two terms, while the six men before him had only vetoed nine bills, mostly for unconstitutional issues. President Jackson vetoed bills if they conflicted with his agenda. The tariffs he passed also had problems. They favored the North. The South would have to pay more for got with the high taxes on imported goods, and they strongly opposed them. ...read more.

Conclusion

Mostly the New York business men and bankers favored the national bank. This caused the land prices and money to inflate. When Jackson left office the next president was left with a seven year depression. As the depression became worse and wages dropped it became more sever. Andrew Jackson was not a very good president. His poor choices caused many problems for the nation during and after his terms. He fought several ideas that would have helped the nation economy. He also used his power to veto laws that would interferer with his political agenda. Even with Jackson's few political victories he was not a very effective president. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The essay is mostly focused on reasons why Jackson was a bad president when the student in fact needs to focus on both sides of the argument, because it shows they are able to think widely and understand that there ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The essay is mostly focused on reasons why Jackson was a bad president when the student in fact needs to focus on both sides of the argument, because it shows they are able to think widely and understand that there is more than one opinion on historical events. The student could improve this by devoting a whole paragraph to the two positive things they mentioned in the introduction - removing office holders and helping the economy. However, the essay doesn't wander off into other areas and stays focused on Jackson, which is good as it shows the student has enough knowledge to stick to the question.

Level of analysis

Some of the evidence used in the essay is good, such as "1 in 10 men were removed". But it isn't clear whether the student thinks this is a good thing or not. They could improve by explaining why this was significant - they could say something like "This is actually a relatively small amount of people, showing that Jackson failed in his attempt to bring in new people." At some points, the essay goes into too much detail without explaining the significance of the detail - the third paragraph doesn't start talking about the cause or the effects of Jackson's actions until the fifth sentence. The conclusion is good as it is because it reaches a judgement, showing that the student can identify a strong argument and choose it as the most important. But because the essay itself doesn't consider both sides of the argument, the conclusion is let down. This is why it is important to consider more than one interpretation and keep it up for the whole essay, or else it lets all of it down. It is important to go into detail when explaining things, but not go into detail when describing things - anyone can learn details of an event, but it takes judgement and historical knowledge to explain why they were important. "President Jackson was not a very effective president. President Jackson made many choices based upon his political goals, not for the American people..." suggests that you are only an effective president if you make choices for the American people, but doesn't say why. It would be better to explain that Jackson could be interpreted as someone who was effective at hitting his political goals, but he could also be interpreted as someone who was effective at working for the American people. You could then do a paragraph on each to show you are considering the two sides of the argument.

Quality of writing

The student repeats "President Jackson" quite a lot - there is no need to say "President" at all because it is clear who you are referring to if you say "Jackson", and the student could also say "he" more often, as repetition of "President Jackson" in nearly every sentence makes the essay sound repetitive and like a story. The sentences are also quite short, which adds to the sense that it is being told like a story (see Level of analysis section). However, the essay's quality of writing benefits from the use of technical terms like "cause", such as "This caused the land prices and money to inflate". Words like "cause" often appear in mark schemes and are better than phrases you'd find in a story, like "and then land prices and money inflated", because it shows you have a full understanding of how one event in history causes another to happen.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by lordharvey 18/04/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. How far do you agree with this description of the prosperity of the USA ...

    But the wealth was not being spread around enough and 75% of people lived in unsatisfactory conditions. 32% of the wealth went to the top 5% of people and only 10% of the wealth went to the poorest 42%. Women and ethnic minorities had lower incomes on average and the Industrial North East and the North West had higher incomes.

  2. Revision notes - the USA 1945 to 1980

    The most famous were Klaus Fuchs, a German born British Physicist, and the Rosenbergs, a US couple who were tried and executed in 1953. 5. Finally the McCarran act said that no communist could have a US passport or work in the defence industries.

  1. GOVERNMENT POLICY WAS THE KEY CAUSE OF THE WALL STREET CRASH. HOW FAR ...

    not prevented from using their profits to speculate on the stock market, adding further insecurity (gambling!) to Wall Street. Unfortunately, by the end of the 1920s, many trusts - such as car giants like Ford - were producing more than was needed (and couldn't sell their surpluses abroad thanks to the government's tariff policy).

  2. Evaluate the view that overproduction of goods was the most important reason for the ...

    Government favoured bigger businesses and encouraged farms to co-operate to produce, however although this might have helped larger farms it had little benefit for traditional agricultural workers. In addition, the government was just not responsible for the overproduction but also the other failing aspects of the economy.

  1. How important was the strength of opposition to impact the New Deal in the ...

    New Deal he believed it was a communist conspiracy, yet he too fought for similar polices which I believe worsened his credibility, overall his authority and strength did impact the economy, his significance undoubtedly was there yet lost popularity consequently losing his radio program, but he was too radical to

  2. To what extent does a fear of Communism explain the changes in American policy ...

    They targeted mainly the immigrants from Southern Europe and Asia, therefore it can be argued that they were considered more of a threat than the Germans. Also, America further excluded itself from the rest of the world through their policy of isolation and their refusal to join the League of

  1. How successful was Roosevelt in delivering relief, recovery and reform during the New Deal?

    Unemployment jumped from 14.3% in 1937 to 19.0% in 1938 (Lee, p. 236). This reflects the federal government?s failure to create an environment in which future economic depressions would be avoided. This brings us to the last section, where the aim of reform is being assessed.

  2. The Great Depression, causes and effects.

    The First World War and the great depression have a positive relationship. The effects of the war were the beginning of the great depression. America joined the World War 1 later on during the war, they not only spent less recourses fighting but came out of the war still holding

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work