• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Andrew Jackson was an effective and vigorous president, who acted upon a few key convictions,

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

I feel the statement, "Andrew Jackson was an effective and vigorous president, who acted upon a few key convictions," is a poor description of Andrew Jackson's presidency. While Andrew Jackson confronted a few major issues, such as removing some of the men that had hold been holding office for many years, about 1 in 10 men were removed. He also passed a few protective tariffs in an attempt to help the American economy. ...read more.

Middle

He had promised to fix the corrupt government, but he vetoed twelve bills during his two terms, while the six men before him had only vetoed nine bills, mostly for unconstitutional issues. President Jackson vetoed bills if they conflicted with his agenda. The tariffs he passed also had problems. They favored the North. The South would have to pay more for got with the high taxes on imported goods, and they strongly opposed them. ...read more.

Conclusion

Mostly the New York business men and bankers favored the national bank. This caused the land prices and money to inflate. When Jackson left office the next president was left with a seven year depression. As the depression became worse and wages dropped it became more sever. Andrew Jackson was not a very good president. His poor choices caused many problems for the nation during and after his terms. He fought several ideas that would have helped the nation economy. He also used his power to veto laws that would interferer with his political agenda. Even with Jackson's few political victories he was not a very effective president. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The essay is mostly focused on reasons why Jackson was a bad president when the student in fact needs to focus on both sides of the argument, because it shows they are able to think widely and understand that there ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The essay is mostly focused on reasons why Jackson was a bad president when the student in fact needs to focus on both sides of the argument, because it shows they are able to think widely and understand that there is more than one opinion on historical events. The student could improve this by devoting a whole paragraph to the two positive things they mentioned in the introduction - removing office holders and helping the economy. However, the essay doesn't wander off into other areas and stays focused on Jackson, which is good as it shows the student has enough knowledge to stick to the question.

Level of analysis

Some of the evidence used in the essay is good, such as "1 in 10 men were removed". But it isn't clear whether the student thinks this is a good thing or not. They could improve by explaining why this was significant - they could say something like "This is actually a relatively small amount of people, showing that Jackson failed in his attempt to bring in new people." At some points, the essay goes into too much detail without explaining the significance of the detail - the third paragraph doesn't start talking about the cause or the effects of Jackson's actions until the fifth sentence. The conclusion is good as it is because it reaches a judgement, showing that the student can identify a strong argument and choose it as the most important. But because the essay itself doesn't consider both sides of the argument, the conclusion is let down. This is why it is important to consider more than one interpretation and keep it up for the whole essay, or else it lets all of it down. It is important to go into detail when explaining things, but not go into detail when describing things - anyone can learn details of an event, but it takes judgement and historical knowledge to explain why they were important. "President Jackson was not a very effective president. President Jackson made many choices based upon his political goals, not for the American people..." suggests that you are only an effective president if you make choices for the American people, but doesn't say why. It would be better to explain that Jackson could be interpreted as someone who was effective at hitting his political goals, but he could also be interpreted as someone who was effective at working for the American people. You could then do a paragraph on each to show you are considering the two sides of the argument.

Quality of writing

The student repeats "President Jackson" quite a lot - there is no need to say "President" at all because it is clear who you are referring to if you say "Jackson", and the student could also say "he" more often, as repetition of "President Jackson" in nearly every sentence makes the essay sound repetitive and like a story. The sentences are also quite short, which adds to the sense that it is being told like a story (see Level of analysis section). However, the essay's quality of writing benefits from the use of technical terms like "cause", such as "This caused the land prices and money to inflate". Words like "cause" often appear in mark schemes and are better than phrases you'd find in a story, like "and then land prices and money inflated", because it shows you have a full understanding of how one event in history causes another to happen.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by lordharvey 18/04/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. GOVERNMENT POLICY WAS THE KEY CAUSE OF THE WALL STREET CRASH. HOW FAR ...

    For example, in March 1929, one member of the Fed (Charles A. Mitchell) acted without the agreement of the Fed to publically announce that if money became tight because of higher interest rates, his bank (New York's National City Bank)

  2. How far do you agree with this description of the prosperity of the USA ...

    But the introduction of credit caused many people to spend way beyond their means to keep up with the craze of buying new and exciting consumer goods. $7 billion worth of goods was bought on credit during the time period, this lead to a staggering amount of debt and repossessions.

  1. To what extent does a fear of Communism explain the changes in American policy ...

    Therefore it is evident that economic fears were significant in the changing policy towards immigration, however due to the many benefits of them, it can be argued that the fear of Communism was more significant. Significant religious fears existed in America in the 1920s which can be argued to have had an influence on the changing American policy on immigration.

  2. How important was the strength of opposition to impact the New Deal in the ...

    to improve the New Deal"13 this was successful as he implemented many ways that prolonged the New Deal becoming more effective. Clearly suggests that "Townsend's idea's influenced Roosevelt's thinking of the New Deal"14 Pennington believed that Townsend proved to be beneficial, similar to Coughlin he too had support of 5

  1. Revision notes - the USA 1945 to 1980

    3. Blacks. Like women many black Americans were needed to work during the war. The government needed 16 million extra workers during the war and many of these were black Americans. In 1941 Philip Randolph organised a march of 100,000 in Washington demanding the right to "work and fight for our country".

  2. The Great Depression, causes and effects.

    American banks were willing and able to give such loans up and until their banks started failing and the economy started experiencing a financial crisis. Following this the banks started asking the countries to repay the loans and stopped giving out more loans, this put immense pressure on the countries in debt especially those affected by the war first hand.

  1. Assess the view that the introduction of National Prohibition in the USA was inspired ...

    Rankin sat in the congress in 1916 proving to all women and the American society that women did have a voice and they could and should be heard. Interpretation D strongly supports the importance of women in the inspiration of the introduction of the National prohibition in the USA.

  2. How successful was Roosevelt in delivering relief, recovery and reform during the New Deal?

    The strategy for raising extra money to fund a range of relief programmes was the undistributed profit tax - up to 79%. Inevitably this caused deterioration of the crisis: ?horrified by what they [businessmen and industry owners] perceived as an existential threat, businesses stopped buying equipment and postponed expansion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work