• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Andrew Jackson was an effective and vigorous president, who acted upon a few key convictions,

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

I feel the statement, "Andrew Jackson was an effective and vigorous president, who acted upon a few key convictions," is a poor description of Andrew Jackson's presidency. While Andrew Jackson confronted a few major issues, such as removing some of the men that had hold been holding office for many years, about 1 in 10 men were removed. He also passed a few protective tariffs in an attempt to help the American economy. ...read more.

Middle

He had promised to fix the corrupt government, but he vetoed twelve bills during his two terms, while the six men before him had only vetoed nine bills, mostly for unconstitutional issues. President Jackson vetoed bills if they conflicted with his agenda. The tariffs he passed also had problems. They favored the North. The South would have to pay more for got with the high taxes on imported goods, and they strongly opposed them. ...read more.

Conclusion

Mostly the New York business men and bankers favored the national bank. This caused the land prices and money to inflate. When Jackson left office the next president was left with a seven year depression. As the depression became worse and wages dropped it became more sever. Andrew Jackson was not a very good president. His poor choices caused many problems for the nation during and after his terms. He fought several ideas that would have helped the nation economy. He also used his power to veto laws that would interferer with his political agenda. Even with Jackson's few political victories he was not a very effective president. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The essay is mostly focused on reasons why Jackson was a bad president when the student in fact needs to focus on both sides of the argument, because it shows they are able to think widely and understand that there ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The essay is mostly focused on reasons why Jackson was a bad president when the student in fact needs to focus on both sides of the argument, because it shows they are able to think widely and understand that there is more than one opinion on historical events. The student could improve this by devoting a whole paragraph to the two positive things they mentioned in the introduction - removing office holders and helping the economy. However, the essay doesn't wander off into other areas and stays focused on Jackson, which is good as it shows the student has enough knowledge to stick to the question.

Level of analysis

Some of the evidence used in the essay is good, such as "1 in 10 men were removed". But it isn't clear whether the student thinks this is a good thing or not. They could improve by explaining why this was significant - they could say something like "This is actually a relatively small amount of people, showing that Jackson failed in his attempt to bring in new people." At some points, the essay goes into too much detail without explaining the significance of the detail - the third paragraph doesn't start talking about the cause or the effects of Jackson's actions until the fifth sentence. The conclusion is good as it is because it reaches a judgement, showing that the student can identify a strong argument and choose it as the most important. But because the essay itself doesn't consider both sides of the argument, the conclusion is let down. This is why it is important to consider more than one interpretation and keep it up for the whole essay, or else it lets all of it down. It is important to go into detail when explaining things, but not go into detail when describing things - anyone can learn details of an event, but it takes judgement and historical knowledge to explain why they were important. "President Jackson was not a very effective president. President Jackson made many choices based upon his political goals, not for the American people..." suggests that you are only an effective president if you make choices for the American people, but doesn't say why. It would be better to explain that Jackson could be interpreted as someone who was effective at hitting his political goals, but he could also be interpreted as someone who was effective at working for the American people. You could then do a paragraph on each to show you are considering the two sides of the argument.

Quality of writing

The student repeats "President Jackson" quite a lot - there is no need to say "President" at all because it is clear who you are referring to if you say "Jackson", and the student could also say "he" more often, as repetition of "President Jackson" in nearly every sentence makes the essay sound repetitive and like a story. The sentences are also quite short, which adds to the sense that it is being told like a story (see Level of analysis section). However, the essay's quality of writing benefits from the use of technical terms like "cause", such as "This caused the land prices and money to inflate". Words like "cause" often appear in mark schemes and are better than phrases you'd find in a story, like "and then land prices and money inflated", because it shows you have a full understanding of how one event in history causes another to happen.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by lordharvey 18/04/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. How far do you agree with this description of the prosperity of the USA ...

    But the wealth was not being spread around enough and 75% of people lived in unsatisfactory conditions. 32% of the wealth went to the top 5% of people and only 10% of the wealth went to the poorest 42%. Women and ethnic minorities had lower incomes on average and the Industrial North East and the North West had higher incomes.

  2. GOVERNMENT POLICY WAS THE KEY CAUSE OF THE WALL STREET CRASH. HOW FAR ...

    Government policy concerning the regulation of banks and banking was also a key factor in the crash. There were no controls concerning mergers and competition so, by 1929, 1% of America's banks controlled 46% of the nation's assets. This meant that the stability of the country's banking system depended on

  1. Discuss the influences on Malcolm X and how they helped form his ideology in ...

    The Nation of Islam empowered many African Americans to reject racism and to build upon their own societies without the need of external help, just as Marcus Garvey had done a few decades earlier. Up until 1963, this was the ideology Malcolm was developing and putting into direct action and he whole heartedly accepted without question.

  2. To what extent does a fear of Communism explain the changes in American policy ...

    Therefore it is evident that economic fears were significant in the changing policy towards immigration, however due to the many benefits of them, it can be argued that the fear of Communism was more significant. Significant religious fears existed in America in the 1920s which can be argued to have had an influence on the changing American policy on immigration.

  1. How important was the strength of opposition to impact the New Deal in the ...

    to improve the New Deal"13 this was successful as he implemented many ways that prolonged the New Deal becoming more effective. Clearly suggests that "Townsend's idea's influenced Roosevelt's thinking of the New Deal"14 Pennington believed that Townsend proved to be beneficial, similar to Coughlin he too had support of 5

  2. To What extent had the New Deal been successful in overcoming the Depression in ...

    into practice which resulted in the rise of pricing and the decrease of consumer consumption. It was also looked upon as relieving the employers rather than the employees. Social groups that were left wing saw the NRA as an implement of the corporate state significant to Italian and German fascism.

  1. The Great Depression, causes and effects.

    This lead to a spread of the depression. The American government set up the Federal Reserve System to give out loans to commercial banks to support them. The Federal Reserve System gave the go ahead to create federal notes that increase our paper money supply.

  2. How successful was Roosevelt in delivering relief, recovery and reform during the New Deal?

    Moreover, their actions were not coordinated and were delivered disproportionately: not all states received the same amount of aid from the federal government. These might be some reasons for why the implementation of the New Deal programmes can be seen as rather chaotic and reactionary.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work