• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In the period 1945-50, the USA and the USSR were equally aggressive towards each other and thus equally responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War. How far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"In the period 1945-50, the USA and the USSR were equally aggressive towards each other and thus equally responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War." How far do you agree? Historiography regarding the Cold War has long revolved around its origins, with the roles of economic, political and ideological factors behind actions examined ad nauseam. The assumption asserts that mutual acts of intended hostility between the US and the USSR of equal degree was the reason for the start of the Cold War, hence the two superpowers should both be equally held accountable. This implies that the superpowers intended to start the Cold War, and their actions were calculated to inflict maximum damage on the other party, so as to qualify the acts as aggressive. But with the collapse of the Soviet Union, new evidence has arose to further substantiate the traditionalist thought that Stalin was inherently aggressive in thought and action, much more than the US. Though US actions from 1946-49 could be deemed as more aggressive than Soviet actions, they were provoked by Stalin's inherently expansionistic ambitions and overt aggression in 1945-46, rather than possessing any aggressive notions themselves. ...read more.

Middle

US actions in 1945-46, on the other hand, were definitely less aggressive than the USSR because they lacked the intent for aggression. The abrupt end of the Land Lease Aid with the end of the war was looked upon less than favourably by the USSR, and was seen as an act of aggression. But the US did not intend it to be so; to them, the Land Lease Aid was a form of wartime assistance, to be terminated upon the end of the war. The delay in the opening of the second front during WWII was seen by the USSR as a deliberate act of aggression, with the consequence being Soviet forces being forced to bear the full weight of the German onslaught for a longer period of time. But it can be argued the Americans were merely being concerned for the welfare and lives of their own soldiers, for which they were definitely accountable to the American people, something that Stalin was foreign to. The US had every intention of brokering a peaceful post-war relationship with the USSR, as Truman was influenced by the American people's desire for peace, until aggressive actions by the USSR like the aforementioned as well ...read more.

Conclusion

The USSR also accelerated the Sovietisation of Eastern Europe after the implementation of the Marshall Plan by the US. The increasing affluence of Bizonia and the creation of the Deutschmark in 1948 also led Stalin to impose the Berlin Blockade, which spectacularly failed. The Berlin Blockade then led to the formation of NATO, consolidating Europe's split into 2 camps. In conclusion, it can be seen how initial and intended Soviet aggression in 1945 led the US to change its pacifist stance in 1946 to an equally aggressive one in 1947 through the Truman Doctrine. Stalin's imperialistic ambitions were fuelled partly by ideology and partly by insecurity, and it can be seen how his perception of the world influenced Truman's worldview to change and follow suit. With Stalin being the provocateur as well as the man with the expansionistic ambitions, it can thus be seen how the USSR was more aggressive in 1945-46, leading to equal American aggression in 1947-48, and thus the USSR should be more responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War, reflecting the Post-post revisionist school of thought. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How far do you agree that the actions of the USSR were primarily responsible ...

    3 star(s)

    While America in particular wanted to promote a democracy to de-nazify Germany, Stalin had allowed deliberate plans for the promotion of the German Communist Party. The fact that the allies disagreed over things like this shows that without more fighting, Germany did have to separate.

  2. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    The fact that Stalin allowed the London Poles to be crushed by the Nazis shows the long-term planning Stalin had done regarding Eastern Europe and that it was clear that he did not only aim to liberate Poland from the Nazis but to also install his communist "lackeys".

  1. To what extent were germany to blame for the outbreak of ww1

    This was an offensive battle plan. Germany feared 'Encirclement' of the Entente: Russia to the East, France to the West and Britain to the North East. Therefore Germany mad plans too overcome these. Some Historians would argue and say that the Schliffen plan cannot be seen as absolute proof that Germany were to blame.

  2. The Origins of the Cold War.

    The Tragedy of American Diplomacy and Walter LaFeber in his 1967 America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945-1968 argued that the Cold War was primarily an outgrowth of American economic interests, which led Moscow to react defensively to potential U.S.

  1. To What extent was German Foreign Policy responsible for the outbreak of general European ...

    served to strengthen the Russian resolve to stand to aggression from the Central Powers. The Tsar himself wanted peace and this was shown by his hesitation in ordering mobilisation, yet the influential military leaders such as Sukhomlinov who advocated war manipulated him.

  2. Who was responsible for the start of the Cold war?

    Roosevelt fell victim to Polio and died during the gap between the two conferences, replaced by his deputy Harry Truman, Churchill on the other hand had been defeated in a general election and was replaced by Labour Prime Minister Clement Atlee.

  1. How is the development of the Cold War best explained in the period 1945-50?

    The Second World War had cost the Soviet Union as many as 27 million lives. They were determined that they would not be attacked again from the west. To ensure their protection they established friendly, communist governments on their borders.

  2. How far do you agree with the view that the origins of the Cold ...

    These represented differing models for the conduct of international relations and the seeds of the future conflict were planted in the hostility generated between these two conflicting views, which guided foreign policy for the USA, and the USSR for years up to and after 1945-46.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work