• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In the process of consolidating his position, Napoleons reforms, had by 1808, destroyed the principles of the French Revolution. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"In the process of consolidating his position, Napoleon's reforms, had by 1808, destroyed the principles of the French Revolution." Discuss. The French Revolution was a tremendous event in history that caused a great political and social transformation of France. It had rid France of the 'Ancien R�gime' under a monarchy, and had left in its place, a new country waiting to be rebuilt with seemingly unending potential. Under those who had initiated the French Revolution, three fundamental principles were established; these were to be obeyed at all cost and embodied the spirit of the Revolution. These three principles were: "Libert�, �galit�, fraternit�" or Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. Liberty was the idea that people were to govern themselves and to behave according to their own free will. Equality was based on the abolishment of special privileges enjoyed by elitist groups - it was for the people of France to be equal and for meritocracy to be venerated throughout the country. After the country had endured 'the Terror' government and then the Directory, France was in a weak position - in all aspects, economically, socially, etc. When Napoleon finally came into power, he had to remedy this; and this was achieved by his Napoleonic Reforms. Napoleon's reforms were full of paradoxes; historians argue whether these reforms upheld or betrayed the principles of the French Revolution and whilst some parts of his reforms embodied the main principles of the Revolution, other parts of the same reform could also simultaneously be betraying them - an example of this is the Civil Code. Conversely, there were reforms that nearly totally destroyed the principles of the French Revolution; for instance, the Constitution of 1804. The Constitution of 1804 was a direct betrayal of the principles of the Revolution - the principle of 'equality' especially. It established Napoleon as "Emperor of the French" and also that "the imperial dignity [would] be declared hereditary in his family" - this was an outright return to the hereditary principle of a monarchy, a feature of the Ancien R�gime. ...read more.

Middle

In comparison, the Concordat is similar to this; it does both in regards to upholding and betraying the Revolution. Napoleon signed the Concordat as an attempt to consolidate the power. The Concordat solidified the Roman Catholic Church as the majority church of France and brought back most of its civil status; but most importantly, it united the French public. The Concordat was essentially a betrayal of the principles of the French Revolution. The Revolution had sought to destroy all Christianity in France - especially Catholicism; the First Estate was made up of the church clergy, and the revolutionists intensely opposed this. The creation of the Concordat was a public, official, agreement between the government and the church - something that went against all the Revolution's principles regarding religion. This was also symbolised by the critical involvement of the Pope, someone with whom a supposed supporter of the Revolution should not be associating with, much less make a peaceful deal with. Additionally, most of the terms of the Concordat furthered the betrayal of the Revolution; one of the terms was the confirmation that the separation of church and state had ended - one of the key principles of the Revolution. The historian, D.M.G Sutherland states "the Concordat was close to a restoration of the refractory church, the destruction of which had been a central feature of the great reforms of the National Assembly". If this fundamental rule was betrayed, then whatever term that followed, even if it upheld the Revolution, would be deemed insignificant in comparison. As well as this, the Concordat stated that public worship had to be "in conformity with police regulations which the government shall deem necessary for public peace"; this ensures the government's control over religion and is vague enough to leave the government with ultimate control over the Church. Whilst this upholds the revolutionary principle by restricting the Church, it simultaneously betrays the Revolution by initiating a system whereby there is an ultimate power that has control over the other ...read more.

Conclusion

Instead of there being a 'black or white' answer with the betraying or upholding of the Revolution, Napoleon's reforms are painted with different shades of grey - some lighter and others darker. Some of his reforms consolidated the Revolution; historians like Alfred Cobban claim that "the great gains of the Revolution were preserved"; that the most significant principles of the Revolution were upheld, even if other less important terms were betrayed. This can be compared to Vandal's view that "Napoleon was able to consolidate many of the most important aspects of the Revolution". Both historians are making the same conclusion, that Napoleon's actions and some of his betrayal was for the greater good and had benefited the Revolution in the long term. This contrasts heavily with George Rud�'s opinion which is that "During the Empire, the egalitarianism of the Revolution was abandoned and privilege was restored" - this refers to Napoleon's reinstating an elite group, this time branded the 'notables'. This did betray the most basic revolutionary principle of equality; D.M.G Sutherland furthers this by claiming "this [the notables system] was a clear breach with the Revolution". When the most intrinsic principle of the Revolution is broken, it means the foundation for the Napoleonic government was not built upon revolutionary ideas and therefore, the Empire would not be one that complied with the revolutionary principles. Although many historians do argue for Napoleon and claim that he did, on the whole, consolidated the Revolution, they cannot deny that he had betrayed the most integral laws of it and therefore, in essence, betrayed the Revolution itself. There may have been small parts where Napoleon was upholding the principles, but these were always located in large documents which had essentially betrayed the Revolution on the whole - it is useless picking out small details that supported the Revolution, when the whole of the Napoleonic Reforms, in the bigger picture, had all played a hand in the destruction of the principles of the French Revolution. ?? ?? ?? ?? Lily Wu "In the process of consolidating his position..." History 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that Napoleons Empire ...

    5 star(s)

    Interpretation B mentions the end of feudalism with the Civil Code, ?While there is?social designs.? Interpretation B shows clearly that while Napoleon was greatly reforming regarding France, within the Empire?s subject states this reforming attitude was put second behind his need of the subject states for his military and dynastic ambitions.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Major Causes of French Revolution

    4 star(s)

    were becoming more independent and literate, yet were still regarded as a general burden who were overtaxed and despised. These tensions were becoming sharper as the century went on. The French peasant was heavily burdened on taxation and in years of bad harvest and depression, they were intolerable.

  1. To what extent had Napoleon betrayed the French Revolution in his domestic policy by ...

    He set up another nobility in 1802, which he named the "Legion of Honour". This was just another way of him securing power by keeping those with money in favour of Napoleon's rule. He managed to do this by gifting them with money and titles, which not only was an

  2. How successful were the reforms of the National Assembly in bringing about liberty and ...

    in many rural areas, the lack of talented literate men caused rural councils to carry out their duties poorly. This would also have meant that these rural communities were not being administered properly, and so one could argue their treatment was unfair and they were not equal with the town councils.

  1. Did napoleon betray the Revolution?

    And even though all constitutional changes were put through a plebiscite, in practice they were rigged and unrepresentative. This shows that Napoleon bent the rules to suit his ideas. The usage of the senatus consultam (having consulted the Senate) in the constitution established in 1800 allowed Napoleon to ignore the elected law-making councils by issuing decrees.

  2. How did Napoleon maintain control in France between in 1799-1814?

    Napoleon abused his influence over the Church to divorce Josephine, who was beyond childbearing age. If Napoleon had not done this his future could have been uncertain without a heir and may have lost support. Napoleon, again like Hitler recognised the important of preparing the next generation of supporters.

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * Napoleon knew this from his own experience - as commander of the Army of Italy and then the Army of Egypt he had frequently made his own decisions and he had acted without reference to anyone. * His new arrangements were based on the ideas of Guibert, whose thinking

  2. To what extent was Napoleon nothing more than a dictator?

    This severely weakens the initial argument that Napoleon provided popular sovereignty, as it was tainted with unjust intervention to ensure power/support. Ultimately, it can be seen that Napoleon operated a plebiscitary dictatorship, merely using aspects of a liberal government to ensure his support.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work