• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In the years 1933 " 1945 the German Churches supported and collaborated with the Nazi regime far more than they opposed it(TM) Explain why you agree or disagree with this view.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

(A) Explain why the Catholic Church moved from a position of co-operation to a position of conflict with the Nazi regime in the years 1933 to '39? In Hitler's rise to power he avoided direct attacks on the Churches and number 24 of his 25 point plan spoke in favour of 'positive Christianity' which was closely linked to racial and national views. However there can be little doubt that Nazism was based on fundamentally anti-Christian philosophy. But the Church was willing to neither condone nor condemn Hitler so long as he did not interfere with religious policy. In his very first speech as Chancellor, Hitler paid tribute to the Catholic Church as being integral to the well being of the nation. Members of the SA were even encouraged to attend services of the Catholic churches but also Protestant. The Catholic Church responded in a sympathetic way to the overtures of the Nazis. Catholic bishops, in particular, were frightened of the possibility of a repeat of the so called 'Kulturkampf' (cultural struggle, refers to the tension between the Church and German state in the 1870s) So, Catholic Bishops were concerned to safeguard the position of the church under the Nazis and in July 1933 a Concordat was signed between the papacy and the regime. ...read more.

Middle

However, there is much evidence that the Churches disagreed with the Nazis on a number of issues. The Nazi ideology regarding the supreme Aryan race and Hitler's final solution completely opposed Christian morality and values. The totalitarian nature of the Nazi regime should have caused friction between the Churches and Nazis; both groups aimed to be the main authority of the German community; this is illustrated paramount through the Churches community groups and schools, those which Hitler aimed to replace. This suggests that both are a threat to each other's power, indeed Hitler would not have attempted to weaken the Churches if they had posed little threat to the Nazi regime and his aims. Hitler attempted to weaken the Churches through three stages: control, weaken, and then replace. He approached the two main Christian denominations, Protestantism and Catholicism, very differently. Hitler began by establishing the Reich Churches, an umbrella organization which incorporated all the Protestant Churches under former Nazi minister Ludwig Muller. There was an opposing group which resisted the Nazis; a splinter group consisting of 500 pastors who rejected the Nazis, the Confessional Church. However, it is most likely that this Church, founded by Martin Niemoller among others and later joined by Dietrich Bonhoffer, opposed state intervention within the Church rather than specifically the Nazi Party's policies and ideals. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Catholic Church did the same; Hitler simply approached this Church differently with the Concordat which they were forced to sign to remain indifferent. This is proven by Pope Pius XII's refusal to ex-communicate Catholics participating in the genocide, further by the many rumours that local catholic priests were in knowledge of the final solution and never protested. Hitler's aims regarding the Churches were most successful among Protestants, although this is predictable as they are a less totalitarian denomination than Catholics. The collaborations were very sparse, and the resistance was from individual Christians rather than the powerful Churches that Hitler was concerned with. Hitler was successful in extending Nazi influence into religion to a certain extent; the fact that he totally failed to replace religion with the German Faith Movement shows that the Churches were an incredibly powerful force within Germany, and Christianity flourished once more in Germany after the war. The Churches' silence over Nazi policies is a very controversial issue, the Catholic Church remains to deny all knowledge of the genocide, and this silence illustrates the fear that the Churches felt towards the Nazis; the Churches compromised in order to survive. Also, the Churches were more concerned with defending their institutions than opposing the Nazis on a broader front. Dom Ansell L6P ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far was the holocaust a long term plan of nazi racial policy?

    In viewing Nazi party literature, the fundamental anti-Semitic view is portrayed; however, there is no mention, or implication of the planning of the final solution. An example of this is the 25-point programme, published in 1920. "4. Only members of the nation may be citizens of the State.

  2. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    key industrialists and landowners were very concerned about the lack of effective government. They had never been committed to parliamentary democracy and now believed their fears were confirmed. Some saw the possibility of using the Nazi's popular support to channel the political system in a more authoritarian direction.

  1. Success of Daniel O'Connell's Catholic Emancipation Campaign

    Short Answer: Others believe that Catholic Emancipation would have not had a chance in passing Parliament without the great leadership of Daniel O'Connell. O'Connell used several methods to bring the issue to the forefront. He set up the Catholic Association where he wanted to "take the strongest measures the law

  2. "A society of onlookers and bystanders. How far do you agree with this description ...

    Recent historiography has emphasised the need for the dehumanisation of an enemy in order to allow for the conditions under which maltreatment is possible, with Herf arguing that the anti-Semitic consensus shaped during the 1930s created an ?indispensable reservoir of public hatred, contempt, and indifference? that made it possible? to move on to a final solution?.

  1. Nazi war production in the years 1939-45 was essentially inefficient. How far do you ...

    and then on into Iraq, he might have captured the petroleum facilities with little difficulty. On the other hand, this would have meant Hitler would have been required to put aside his dreams of the convenient Lebensraum and focus solely on the necessity of oil rather than more expansionist ideas; something Hitler was unlikely to give up.

  2. 'Nazi attempts to control the German Churches had limited success in the years 1933 ...

    For example over 700 Protestant priests were arrested in 1935 for condemning neo-pagan teaching in schools. This consequently shows how despite the efforts of the Nazis neo-pagan teachings where still a part of school teachings. Furthermore they failed to punish Bishop Galen in 1941 when he publicly protested against euthanasia.

  1. How far do you agree that Hitler became chancellor in January 1933 primarily due ...

    For example, before Hitler was appointed, Heinrich Bruning was the chancellor as well as a conservative politician. As his predecessors had experienced, he also did not have support from the Reichstag. Despite this the main reason he lost office was down to the fact that he did not implement any policies that would change the current economic climate.

  2. Their use of terror was the main reason that the Nazis retained control in ...

    With the national holiday on May 1st, the Nazis prepared to ban and eliminate any trade unions by confiscating union funds and arresting union leaders. Creating one large union called the DAF; the Nazis had control over all trade unions and ?nazified? all organisations and associations that existed in society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work