• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenins Economic Policies lacked consistency in the period 1918-1924. How far would you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History-Russia Essay "Lenin's Economic Policies lacked consistency in the period 1918-1924." How far would you agree with this statement? From 1918 to 1924 Lenin introduced three different economic policies, each of them either slightly or completely different than their predecessors. He started out with a form ofcapitalism, then changed to a form of communism and then went back again to a form of capitalism. In this sense they were not very consistent because every one of them was different from the other. However, they were consistent in the sense that they were all used for the survival of the Bolshevik party. The first policy which Lenin adopted was State Capitalism in October 1917, just after he had gained power. It was technically introduced by Sovnarkom but Lenin and the Bolsheviks were the ones who controlled it and had established it. State Capitalism was basically giving the peasants and workers what they wanted so that they would be on the side of the Bolsheviks and would not try to overthrow them. State Capitalism gave the peasants the right to take over the estates of the gentry without permission or having to give compensation. The peasants then divided the land up between themselves as they wished and the land could not be bought, rented or sold because it belonged to the entire people. ...read more.

Middle

Each individual industry was brought under the control of different departments within the Vesenkha. These individual departments were called glavki. The Vesenkha was attached to Sovnarkom. Discipline was reasserted into the factories and the nationalisation of the industries meant that the one man management replaced the workers councils. In addition the Bolsheviks introduced internal passports in an attempt to halt the flood of industrial workers to the countryside. Trotsky wanted to tighten control over industrial workers even more by creating a labour army which was to work under the control of military discipline, however, Lenin overruled him. From 1918 onwards, the policy of grain requisitioning was introduced, which meant that 'Food Brigades' were sent out from the towns to extract peasantry to feed the people of the towns and cities. On occasions and when necessary, the Red Army and the Cheka were used to extract this grain. In practice the grain requisitioning was basically the theft of the grain. This annoyed the peasants because it often meant that they had barely enough grain for themselves and their families. Rationing was introduced and it really brought to light the Bolsheviks priorities and values. The biggest rations went to the Red Army soldiers and the workers in the heavy industry, and then came the civil servants and the workers in the light industry. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, the industries that remained under the control of the state after 1921-22 were not complete owned by the government. They were expected to trade at a profit, and if they got into difficulties then they would not have been bailed out by the government. Industries and factories were consequently forced to increase efficiency and this meant a rise in unemployment as they tried to get rid of extra workers that were not really needed. However, the Bolsheviks were once again not happy with this because it was more like capitalism than it was like communism. The fact that small business ownership had been legalised meant that there was an uptake in get-rich-quick traders, or 'nepmen', which opened casinos, bars and nightclubs in the major cities. This policy was once again a chance at survival that seemed to not to be very successful and ended up being dubbed with such names as the 'Peasant Brest-Litovsk.' All of Lenin's economic policies were aimed at the survival of the Bolshevik party. The state capitalism and the New Economic policy was used to give the people what they wanted so as to keep them happy and the War Communism took what was needed to keep the people of the cities and towns happy. Therefore they had consistency in that way. However, because each one was different, they were not very consistent and this led to the people being annoyed that everything was being constantly changed. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Why did bolsheviks win civil war

    Trotsky imposed a very tough system of discipline and control over the Red Army and the death penalty was used frequently for those officers who were found guilty of cowardice or treachery. This meant that conscripts knew what would happen to them if they retreated in a battle.

  2. The Third English Civil War

    In the north of England Harrison complained to Cromwell of the "badness" of his men, and the lord general sympathized, having "had much such stuff" sent him to make good the losses in trained men. Even he for a moment lost touch with the spirit of the people.

  1. Explain why the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks Split in 1903

    Lenin saw the activities of the trade unions as simple distractions. Both parties got their main support from the working class.

  2. Robespierre fell when the Terror had outlived its usefulness- How far do you agree ...

    work of the "armee revolutionare" by 1793 and uprisings in the provinces had been crushed. With all of these threats to the Republic having been dealt with for the time being many began to question the need for government by terror.

  1. Why Were Some Forms Of Nationalism More Successful Than Others In Achieving Concessions From ...

    The success of the Act in most of Ireland depended on the Land League's reaction to it. Parnell did not denounce it completely, but complained that it did not do enough. The Chief Secretary believed that Parnell was trying to wreck the Act and arrested him in October 1881 under terms of the Coercion Bill of 1880.

  2. How Important Were The Policies Of Gorbachev In Bringing An End To The Cold ...

    As a result, he wanted to destroy a small part of his nuclear weapons. These decisions seemed to be quite effective. Again, the Cold War was named that since there was no physical fighting, there was just cold relations between the East and West and their ideologies.

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    The two million Indian soldiers were to fight on the side of the people who had invaded their country. Congress decided that it would support participation in the war, but only with India as an independent state with a wartime national government.

  2. Maos Leadership was the crucial factor in the Communists winning the 1945 Civil War. ...

    By 1946, China was in economic turmoil, with corruption and rioting spreading fast, and anti-Nationalist strikes taking place in the cities. The GMD tried to resolve this by borrowing further international funds, and printing more notes. Money now had hardly any value, and with little support for the party the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work