• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenin was responsible for the deaths of millions during the Russian Civil War Do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Lenin was responsible for the deaths of millions during the Russian Civil War"- Do you agree with this statement? In March 1918, Russia was forced to sign the costly Treaty of Brest-Litovsk where it had to cede a large part of its territory containing some 45 million people; including the breadbasket of Russia, Ukraine. There was finally a long overdue reprieve from the many years of fighting but that peace was not to last as the people of Russia would soon be entrenched once again in a heated and violent civil conflict that would cause more than 2.5 million military casualties1 as well as millions of civilian deaths due to collateral damage and famine. At first glance, the Bolsheviks led by Lenin could have been the main perpetrators of the whole conflict that led to the countless deaths. However, in this essay, we will attempt to analyse whether Lenin had made the key decisions that had led to the bloody deaths and confrontations during the Civil War and also if he really had that much of a choice to dictate the course of events that happened during the Civil War considering the circumstances of the time if even at all. Lenin, in all fairness did contribute in no small part to the sparking of the Civil War. ...read more.

Middle

With one in five of the population starving, the Bolsheviks were forced to accept aid from foreign nations such as the American Relief Association (ARA).4 It was with this mindset that he dictated the terror that rained upon the millions of Russians at that time and caused the death of so many. There were other actors that played key roles in the events that occurred during the Civil War as well. One such person was Leon Trotsky who was a key figure in supporting the Bolshevik cause and defending its ideals in the most hardline of fashions. Trotsky was appointed Commisar of War in 1918. Adopting a similar practical approach to his handling of important issues, Trotsky consolidated the power of the Red Guard and supervised the development of a formidable Red Army. He called upon the services of ex-tsarist officers despite deep opposition from his party and instituted conscription on the areas under Bolshevik control. Trotsky did not hesitate to impose an absolute and violent control over the army. He commented on Septemeber 30th that the traitors of the army would risk the arrest of their families.5 Such was the reign of terror Trotsky was prepared to impose to insure the survival of his party. Trotsky was instrumental in the crushing of the Kronstadt Rising in 1921. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while we can see clearly from the events that had taken place before and during the revolution, Lenin, as well as Trotsky, did play active roles in the decisions that were made. Some of which had led to the death of millions. To that effect, it would be fair to say Lenin caused the death of millions during the Russian Civil War. However, when considering the broader picture and the delicate grip over power the Bolsheviks had, it would seem that Lenin was led by circumstances of the time and did not have much maneuvering room to dictate the course of events considering the fact that his top priority was the preservation of his party's political power during the Civil War. (1315 Words) excl. footnotes 1 Krivosheev, G.F., Soviet Casualties and Combat Losses in the Twentieth Century (Greenhill Books, 1997), pp.7-38 2 Lenin, V.I., Collected Works (Progress Publishers, 1972), Volume 27, pp.235-77 3 Volkogonov, Dmitri, Lenin: Autopsy of an Empre: The Seven Leaders Who Built the Soviet Regime (Free Press, 1998), p. 238 4 Lynch, Michael, From Autocracy to Communism: Russia 1894-1941 (Hodder Education, 2008) pp. 152-153 5 Figes, Orlando, A People's Tragedy, The Russian Revolution 1891-1924 (Pimlico, 1996) pp. 590-591 6 Lynch, Michael, From Autocracy to Communism: Russia 1894-1941 (Hodder Education, 2008) p. 172 7 Trotsky, Leon, History of the Russian Revolution Volume 3 (1930) p. 125 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Historians such as Pipes and Volkogonov have made the interpretation that Lenin was a ...

    Peasants who resisted the requisitioning of their crops or who hoarded grain were often shot at. Industrial unrest was similarly crushed. Therefore the Bolshevik regime was aware of the fact that there may be some opposition to the regime from, hence the regime chose to use the Red Terror in order to deal with any possible opposition.

  2. Why Did the Bolsheviks Win the Russian Civil War?

    The Greens were another force in the civil war. They were mainly made up from deserters from the Reds and Whites, as well as peasants who wanted land but not under the terms the Reds were putting forward as they resented the policy of grain requisitions.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    It scarcely matters that party reconcil- ation would have been problematic even without Lenin's opposition---He was resented for not even wanting to try, and for making his views known in such a callous manner and at such an inappropriate time.

  2. The Russian Civil war, 1918-21

    It also meant that the whites could fight a longer drawn out war, for they were not footing the bill, while the soviets could not afford to do this. It is realistic to say that the whites did prove a large threat to the Bolsheviks due to the reasons above.

  1. The importance of the First World War as a turning point in the development ...

    The freeing of the serfs was meant to make agriculture more efficient and help feed the growing urban proletariat. However, this failed to happen as land was often of a poor quality and the land plots were often too small to grow a surplus.

  2. Vietnam war

    50 % population of RVN lost homes * 12 provincial capitals and 51 district capitals destroyed * Economy 40 years behind other south-east Asian countries * 30,000 children from Hanoi and Haiphong deaf from noise of bombs * 65,000 vietnamese assisted by Americans to escape in 1975 * 130,000 more

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Interpretations of motives for the terror: 1. Due to Stalin?s personality, this made him suspicious, vindictive, and even paranoid. He was obsessed with reinforcing his own position, eliminating rivals and getting revenge on fellow Old Bolsheviks. 2. Terror was an integral part of the communist system.

  2. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    If the decision to build death camps had already been made and construction and indeed the process of murdering prisoners within those camps had actually begun, this significantly undermines the significance that the Wannsee Conference had on the Holocaust. However, by the beginning of 1942 in different camps fixed gas

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work