• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenin was responsible for the deaths of millions during the Russian Civil War Do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Lenin was responsible for the deaths of millions during the Russian Civil War"- Do you agree with this statement? In March 1918, Russia was forced to sign the costly Treaty of Brest-Litovsk where it had to cede a large part of its territory containing some 45 million people; including the breadbasket of Russia, Ukraine. There was finally a long overdue reprieve from the many years of fighting but that peace was not to last as the people of Russia would soon be entrenched once again in a heated and violent civil conflict that would cause more than 2.5 million military casualties1 as well as millions of civilian deaths due to collateral damage and famine. At first glance, the Bolsheviks led by Lenin could have been the main perpetrators of the whole conflict that led to the countless deaths. However, in this essay, we will attempt to analyse whether Lenin had made the key decisions that had led to the bloody deaths and confrontations during the Civil War and also if he really had that much of a choice to dictate the course of events that happened during the Civil War considering the circumstances of the time if even at all. Lenin, in all fairness did contribute in no small part to the sparking of the Civil War. ...read more.

Middle

With one in five of the population starving, the Bolsheviks were forced to accept aid from foreign nations such as the American Relief Association (ARA).4 It was with this mindset that he dictated the terror that rained upon the millions of Russians at that time and caused the death of so many. There were other actors that played key roles in the events that occurred during the Civil War as well. One such person was Leon Trotsky who was a key figure in supporting the Bolshevik cause and defending its ideals in the most hardline of fashions. Trotsky was appointed Commisar of War in 1918. Adopting a similar practical approach to his handling of important issues, Trotsky consolidated the power of the Red Guard and supervised the development of a formidable Red Army. He called upon the services of ex-tsarist officers despite deep opposition from his party and instituted conscription on the areas under Bolshevik control. Trotsky did not hesitate to impose an absolute and violent control over the army. He commented on Septemeber 30th that the traitors of the army would risk the arrest of their families.5 Such was the reign of terror Trotsky was prepared to impose to insure the survival of his party. Trotsky was instrumental in the crushing of the Kronstadt Rising in 1921. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while we can see clearly from the events that had taken place before and during the revolution, Lenin, as well as Trotsky, did play active roles in the decisions that were made. Some of which had led to the death of millions. To that effect, it would be fair to say Lenin caused the death of millions during the Russian Civil War. However, when considering the broader picture and the delicate grip over power the Bolsheviks had, it would seem that Lenin was led by circumstances of the time and did not have much maneuvering room to dictate the course of events considering the fact that his top priority was the preservation of his party's political power during the Civil War. (1315 Words) excl. footnotes 1 Krivosheev, G.F., Soviet Casualties and Combat Losses in the Twentieth Century (Greenhill Books, 1997), pp.7-38 2 Lenin, V.I., Collected Works (Progress Publishers, 1972), Volume 27, pp.235-77 3 Volkogonov, Dmitri, Lenin: Autopsy of an Empre: The Seven Leaders Who Built the Soviet Regime (Free Press, 1998), p. 238 4 Lynch, Michael, From Autocracy to Communism: Russia 1894-1941 (Hodder Education, 2008) pp. 152-153 5 Figes, Orlando, A People's Tragedy, The Russian Revolution 1891-1924 (Pimlico, 1996) pp. 590-591 6 Lynch, Michael, From Autocracy to Communism: Russia 1894-1941 (Hodder Education, 2008) p. 172 7 Trotsky, Leon, History of the Russian Revolution Volume 3 (1930) p. 125 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Vietnam war

    * Linebacker 2- When bombing halted, North Vietnam's electrical power supply was crippled, and extensive damage had been caused to all other targets as well. North Vietnamese air defences were shattered. * The bombing of North Vietnam caused extensive damage to the country's war-making capacity but at no point did it seriously hamper Hanoi's drive against the South.

  2. The importance of the First World War as a turning point in the development ...

    Overall the World War had limited economic impact. Other turning points such as Stalins' five year plans had a much greater impact. Stalin managed to improve production levels to equal the West's which had been a major aim of all Russian governments since the start of the period and was only ever neared during Witte's Great Spurt in 1905.

  1. How realistic are POW films?

    It was released in 1955, 10 years after the war ended. Its target audience would consist of mainly British people, as that is the perspective the film is cast from. Its genre is war, comedy and drama. Similarly to the other two films, The Colditz Story also has a mix of realistic and unrealistic aspects.

  2. Why Did the Bolsheviks Win the Russian Civil War?

    This was a lot like the previous bourgeoisie system, however the workers did not complain as they were desperate to keep their jobs. Labour discipline was brought back to the work place. You would have to work hard to get rations.

  1. Stalin had fully consolidated his dictorship by 1935."With referene to the years 1929 to ...

    New factories were built-the large automobile factories at Moscow, the tractor plans at Stalingrad, the steel plants at Magnitogorsk and Kuznetsk Basin, and the hydro-electric stations at Dnieper were all built in this period. The Ural area was developed as an important industrial region.

  2. How Did Trotsky Contribute To

    This helped towards the success of the Bolsheviks. This also contributed towards enhancing his reputation and of the communists by being anti-war. In 1917 he moved from Spain To New York and again moved, this time to Russia where The Tsar was overthrown and became a member of the Bolshevik party.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    This was made worse by the inability to push back the Germans in the first months of their invasion. The impact of the terror on the Soviet population: September 1936 ? December 1938: During the Yezhov years, it?s expected that over 7 million people were arrested, and 1 million executed.

  2. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    of the Ghettos and camps, and the mass-murders of the Einstazgruppen, were far more important in shaping the Holocaust than any formal meetings discussing it. It was acts of murder like these that allowed the Nazi's to push their ?genocidal? boundaries even further, among other goals, it was the overall

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work