• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The need to modernise their backward economy was the most important reason why the rulers of Russia introduced reforms. How far do you agree with this view of the period from 1855 to 1964?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'The need to modernise their backward economy was the most important reason why the rulers of Russia introduced reforms.' How far do you agree with this view of the period from 1855 to 1964? Throughout the 1855-1964 period, both the communist and tsarist rulers of Russia viewed reform as an important tool of Government. Reforms were used by each regime to solidify their position of power, sometimes out of necessity rather than choice such as Alexander II's implementation of the Emancipation Act. The need to modernise their backward economy had been highlighted by Russia's continual failure in war throughout the period, and it was an important reason for reforms being introduced throughout the period. A clear show of continuity throughout the period is the shared desire the rulers of Russia possessed in wanting to reform the economy. They needed to modernise their backward economy not only for security purposes, but to maintain their autocracy. Defeat in the Crimean War had shown Alexander II needed to act to address the industrial backwardness of the Russian economy, a weakness further highlighted following Russia's embarrassment in the Russo Japanese war under Nicholas II. ...read more.

Middle

The rulers of Russia also introduced reforms as a result of political tension within the country. In particular, following the assassination of Alexander II by the People's Will, Alexander III's succession of harsh reforms were implemented with the underlying aim of undoing the work of his father to avoid the 'dangerous spread of ideas'. The Fundamental Laws introduced by Nicholas II were similarly introduced with a political motive, they had allowed Stolypin to change the electoral system which reduced the effectiveness of the Duma as it became flooded with supporters of the Tsar. Political tension following the October Revolution had also influenced Lenin's thinking, acknowledging land seizures in the Land Decree of 1918. However just as Nicholas II did not support the introduction of the Duma, Lenin did not believe private property to be a suitable policy for communism. Just as the effectiveness of the Duma had been reduced by the Fundamental Laws, Lenin sent in the requisitioning squads. Social reform was an important reason behind Lenin's policy of war communism too, as the Civil War had shown that the peasantry were bitterly opposed to the requisition squads. ...read more.

Conclusion

Khrushchev's decision to introduce large scale consumer industry as opposed to undergoing further major industrialisation showed that the need to modernise the backward economy was not the main reason for reform, instead focusing on improving the standard of living for the average Russian. The need to modernise their backward economy was undoubtedly a factor taken into account by the rulers of Russia when introducing reforms. However, it was not the main reason for reform being implemented. War was the integral factor of Russian development throughout the period as it consistently highlighted weaknesses in the Russian state. The Crimean War had caused the emancipation of the serfs, the Russo Japanese war had led to the October Manifesto and the First World War ultimately led not only to the deposition of the Romanovs, but to the creation of Russia as the world's first communist state. A consistent feature throughout the period is the way in which war highlighted the need for reform within Russia, despite the need to modernise their backward economy being a factor, it was often with the aim of increasing military spending or simply to catch up with the Western nations. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    Stalin's repressive methods align him with the Tsars, particularly Alexander III, whose rule was known as "The Reaction", he favoured modernisation and the belief that education was dangerous12. Like Stalin, Alexander III believed that education should be strict and formal, whereas Marxist-Leninism which showed less regard for formal education.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    Procurement prices rose as the state finally realised that they needed to make more of an effort. The main issue of poor quality land which began under Alexander II's emancipation at the start of the period, had also improved under Khrushchev's Virgin Land Schemes.

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    No attention was paid to local conditions. * Emphasis was to be on heavy industry and infrastructure, with consumer goods and living standards a long way down the list of priorities. * In the First Plan very ambitious targets were set: coal production to increase by 100%, iron by 200%, electricity by 400%.

  2. 'Communists and Tsars ruled Russia in the same way.' How far do you agree ...

    However, communists and tsars ruled Russia in the same autocratic way. Communists and Tsars both saw repression as an integral factor of Government, for differing reasons. Alexander III wanted to force through the reversal of his father's reforms, and similarly Stalin and Lenin heavily used repression to wipe out opponents and solidify their position in power.

  1. Free essay

    Was Stalin the most successful ruler of Russia in the period 1855-1956? Explain with ...

    Lenin, however, began to assert his authority without the use of violence with the one party state. However, when opposition increased, he turned to violence, murdering hundreds. However, this was nothing compared to Stalin. Khrushchev, however, maintained his power by his policies.

  2. Why did the rulers of Russia so often resort to repression in the period ...

    that power was questioned when repression was not implemented. Although Lenin also used repression, the similarity in personalities between Nicholas 2 and Stalin meant that both used similar methods. Both were intensely paranoid about the public's perception that they were weak. To disprove this, both resorted to violent repressive tactics.

  1. How far did government policies change towards agriculture in Russia in the period 1856-1964? ...

    peasants wouldn?t have been forced to sell more grain in order to buy commodities; leaving many with no reserves of seed-corn.[58] 350,000 died as a result either from starvation or disease.[59] The concern of the elite, though, had been demonstrated: Zemstvo leaders, local gentry and the national government had all

  2. 'Alexander III was the most successful Tsar in the period 1855-1917'. How far do ...

    area of foreign exporting. However, Vyshnegradsky's push to 'squeeze the peasants', as he put it, and push up exports, meant that combined with the problems of overpopulation and poor weather, his policy resulted in widespread famine (the worst in the whole 19th century), and an economic dip.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work