• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The need to modernise their backward economy was the most important reason why the rulers of Russia introduced reforms. How far do you agree with this view of the period from 1855 to 1964?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'The need to modernise their backward economy was the most important reason why the rulers of Russia introduced reforms.' How far do you agree with this view of the period from 1855 to 1964? Throughout the 1855-1964 period, both the communist and tsarist rulers of Russia viewed reform as an important tool of Government. Reforms were used by each regime to solidify their position of power, sometimes out of necessity rather than choice such as Alexander II's implementation of the Emancipation Act. The need to modernise their backward economy had been highlighted by Russia's continual failure in war throughout the period, and it was an important reason for reforms being introduced throughout the period. A clear show of continuity throughout the period is the shared desire the rulers of Russia possessed in wanting to reform the economy. They needed to modernise their backward economy not only for security purposes, but to maintain their autocracy. Defeat in the Crimean War had shown Alexander II needed to act to address the industrial backwardness of the Russian economy, a weakness further highlighted following Russia's embarrassment in the Russo Japanese war under Nicholas II. ...read more.

Middle

The rulers of Russia also introduced reforms as a result of political tension within the country. In particular, following the assassination of Alexander II by the People's Will, Alexander III's succession of harsh reforms were implemented with the underlying aim of undoing the work of his father to avoid the 'dangerous spread of ideas'. The Fundamental Laws introduced by Nicholas II were similarly introduced with a political motive, they had allowed Stolypin to change the electoral system which reduced the effectiveness of the Duma as it became flooded with supporters of the Tsar. Political tension following the October Revolution had also influenced Lenin's thinking, acknowledging land seizures in the Land Decree of 1918. However just as Nicholas II did not support the introduction of the Duma, Lenin did not believe private property to be a suitable policy for communism. Just as the effectiveness of the Duma had been reduced by the Fundamental Laws, Lenin sent in the requisitioning squads. Social reform was an important reason behind Lenin's policy of war communism too, as the Civil War had shown that the peasantry were bitterly opposed to the requisition squads. ...read more.

Conclusion

Khrushchev's decision to introduce large scale consumer industry as opposed to undergoing further major industrialisation showed that the need to modernise the backward economy was not the main reason for reform, instead focusing on improving the standard of living for the average Russian. The need to modernise their backward economy was undoubtedly a factor taken into account by the rulers of Russia when introducing reforms. However, it was not the main reason for reform being implemented. War was the integral factor of Russian development throughout the period as it consistently highlighted weaknesses in the Russian state. The Crimean War had caused the emancipation of the serfs, the Russo Japanese war had led to the October Manifesto and the First World War ultimately led not only to the deposition of the Romanovs, but to the creation of Russia as the world's first communist state. A consistent feature throughout the period is the way in which war highlighted the need for reform within Russia, despite the need to modernise their backward economy being a factor, it was often with the aim of increasing military spending or simply to catch up with the Western nations. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    When Lenin's NEP is also considered, the peasants were free to sell their excess production and this extra money was designed to help the standard of living, although the low procurement prices and in particular the scissors crisis put pay to that despite the markets being better and taxes being reduced in Lenin's reign.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    In most cases the targets were impossible to achieve. * Such was the response that new improved targets were set in 1929, and these again revised upwards in 1930. It became crucial to meet your planned target. Never mind the quality, meet the target!

  1. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    By using Collectivisation Stalin was implying to the party and the workers that he was spreading the ideals of Collectivisation through out the countryside by removing the NEP, as well as gaining the food to feed the revolution. However it is clear the peasants were not interested in the slightest

  2. 'Communists and Tsars ruled Russia in the same way.' How far do you agree ...

    However, communists and tsars ruled Russia in the same autocratic way. Communists and Tsars both saw repression as an integral factor of Government, for differing reasons. Alexander III wanted to force through the reversal of his father's reforms, and similarly Stalin and Lenin heavily used repression to wipe out opponents and solidify their position in power.

  1. How far does a study of the period 1855 to 1956 suggest that, following ...

    However, crucially, this was only in cases whereby it was in line with Party policy. The next major feature of the Tsarist autocracy was the control of the people. The Tsar extensively used the Russian Orthodox Church in order to support the idea of himself as the 'Little Father' of

  2. Trotsky described war as the 'locomotive of history'. Can it be argued that change ...

    This was also the case under Khrushchev, who often had the best of intentions when implementing policies such as the Virgin Lands scheme. Despite war highlighting the problems Russia needed to address, it was not the only motivational factor in the development of the Russian state.

  1. How far could the fall of the Tsars be considered the most significant turning ...

    This judgment is realistic, especially such as there is evidence from the time to support this view, such as the extreme execution of the abdicated Tsar and his family in 1918. This fear control was significantly worse after the 1917 revolution as the Bolsheviks had considerably more power to impose themselves upon the Russian people, demonstrating a lack of modernisation.

  2. 'Alexander III was the most successful Tsar in the period 1855-1917'. How far do ...

    area of foreign exporting. However, Vyshnegradsky's push to 'squeeze the peasants', as he put it, and push up exports, meant that combined with the problems of overpopulation and poor weather, his policy resulted in widespread famine (the worst in the whole 19th century), and an economic dip.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work