• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The need to modernise their backward economy was the most important reason why the rulers of Russia introduced reforms. How far do you agree with this view of the period from 1855 to 1964?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'The need to modernise their backward economy was the most important reason why the rulers of Russia introduced reforms.' How far do you agree with this view of the period from 1855 to 1964? Throughout the 1855-1964 period, both the communist and tsarist rulers of Russia viewed reform as an important tool of Government. Reforms were used by each regime to solidify their position of power, sometimes out of necessity rather than choice such as Alexander II's implementation of the Emancipation Act. The need to modernise their backward economy had been highlighted by Russia's continual failure in war throughout the period, and it was an important reason for reforms being introduced throughout the period. A clear show of continuity throughout the period is the shared desire the rulers of Russia possessed in wanting to reform the economy. They needed to modernise their backward economy not only for security purposes, but to maintain their autocracy. Defeat in the Crimean War had shown Alexander II needed to act to address the industrial backwardness of the Russian economy, a weakness further highlighted following Russia's embarrassment in the Russo Japanese war under Nicholas II. ...read more.

Middle

The rulers of Russia also introduced reforms as a result of political tension within the country. In particular, following the assassination of Alexander II by the People's Will, Alexander III's succession of harsh reforms were implemented with the underlying aim of undoing the work of his father to avoid the 'dangerous spread of ideas'. The Fundamental Laws introduced by Nicholas II were similarly introduced with a political motive, they had allowed Stolypin to change the electoral system which reduced the effectiveness of the Duma as it became flooded with supporters of the Tsar. Political tension following the October Revolution had also influenced Lenin's thinking, acknowledging land seizures in the Land Decree of 1918. However just as Nicholas II did not support the introduction of the Duma, Lenin did not believe private property to be a suitable policy for communism. Just as the effectiveness of the Duma had been reduced by the Fundamental Laws, Lenin sent in the requisitioning squads. Social reform was an important reason behind Lenin's policy of war communism too, as the Civil War had shown that the peasantry were bitterly opposed to the requisition squads. ...read more.

Conclusion

Khrushchev's decision to introduce large scale consumer industry as opposed to undergoing further major industrialisation showed that the need to modernise the backward economy was not the main reason for reform, instead focusing on improving the standard of living for the average Russian. The need to modernise their backward economy was undoubtedly a factor taken into account by the rulers of Russia when introducing reforms. However, it was not the main reason for reform being implemented. War was the integral factor of Russian development throughout the period as it consistently highlighted weaknesses in the Russian state. The Crimean War had caused the emancipation of the serfs, the Russo Japanese war had led to the October Manifesto and the First World War ultimately led not only to the deposition of the Romanovs, but to the creation of Russia as the world's first communist state. A consistent feature throughout the period is the way in which war highlighted the need for reform within Russia, despite the need to modernise their backward economy being a factor, it was often with the aim of increasing military spending or simply to catch up with the Western nations. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    Despite this Stalin did export communism during the Cold War, encouraging the spread of communism to the East in countries like China and Korea. This also continued into Khrushchev's rule, when he showed support for the development of communism in Cuba.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    When Lenin's NEP is also considered, the peasants were free to sell their excess production and this extra money was designed to help the standard of living, although the low procurement prices and in particular the scissors crisis put pay to that despite the markets being better and taxes being reduced in Lenin's reign.

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * The harvest of 1935 was better. Private plots were allowed, so peasants could keep one cow, some chickens and grow some vegetables. * This was an attempt to stop peasants killing off all their livestock rather than hand it over to the collective farm. * Yields from collective farms remained low - a problem right through

  2. 'Communists and Tsars ruled Russia in the same way.' How far do you agree ...

    However, communists and tsars ruled Russia in the same autocratic way. Communists and Tsars both saw repression as an integral factor of Government, for differing reasons. Alexander III wanted to force through the reversal of his father's reforms, and similarly Stalin and Lenin heavily used repression to wipe out opponents and solidify their position in power.

  1. Assess the view that Russias rulers were opposed to change during the period from ...

    so the lack of political freedom evident under the Tsarist regime had not improved under communist rule. Political advances within Russia such as the Zemstva and the Duma may give the impression that Russian rulers were not opposed to change during the period.

  2. How far did government policies change towards agriculture in Russia in the period 1856-1964? ...

    Magnitogorsk Prof. D. Lanegran. Magnitogorsk. Macalester College A very in-depth essay on the city of Magnitogorsk and its steel works. I was looking for a brief explanation to back up my point which I more than found. I?m confident it?s reliable due to the author?s credentials and its consistency with other sources.

  1. How far did Russia undergo economic and political modernization from 1881-1905?

    political groups underground increased heavily as more and more people had liberal views. Many of these secret societies were infiltrated by the Okhrana, which resulted in many raids and arrests. There were also extremist groups, for example ?the people?s will? who were a revolutionary terrorist group who assassinated Alexander II.

  2. 'Alexander III was the most successful Tsar in the period 1855-1917'. How far do ...

    area of foreign exporting. However, Vyshnegradsky's push to 'squeeze the peasants', as he put it, and push up exports, meant that combined with the problems of overpopulation and poor weather, his policy resulted in widespread famine (the worst in the whole 19th century), and an economic dip.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work