• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

FDR Abandoned Isolationism Against His Will, How Far Do You Agree With This View Of Foreign Policy In The Years 1933 " 1941?

Extracts from this document...


"FDR Abandoned Isolationism Against His Will", How Far Do You Agree With This View Of Foreign Policy In The Years 1933 - 1941? Franklin D. Roosevelt was the thirty second president of the USA from 1933 until 1945. Roosevelt's foreign policy changed between 1933 and 1941. In 1933 it was accepted that his view on foreign policy was isolationism, Roosevelt had domestic constraints and had to maintain an isolationist foreign policy due to an inadequate army and public opinion. Isolationist similarities within Roosevelt's policies can be seen to those previous who served in the Whitehouse. The US from the start stayed out of the League of Nations and also did not become involved directly in European affairs. FDR saw US economic recovery as a domestic challenge that he needed to rise to. Roosevelt also helped destroy the London Economic Conference of 1933 because his isolationist stance. ...read more.


Roosevelt started to accept a more interventionist approach once the dictators became overtly expansionist: such as Mussolini in Ethiopia but, more importantly, Hitler in Austria and Czechoslovakia. Even after the German invasion of Poland, in 1939, FDR would not commit the US to the Allied cause other than allowing economic aid through Cash and Carry and later Lend Lease. He believed that the US should play a key role in foreign affairs in order to defend democracy and human rights around the world. Roosevelt thought that America should be involved in the League of Nations, even though the public and the Senate had refused to ratify its participation. He saw the policy of appeasement by the British government toward Germany only as delaying war. He pushed Congress for air force and naval expansion and organised military talks to prepare for war. Following German and Japanese expansion, Roosevelt made a speech advocating the 'quarantine' of aggressive nations, with some historians believing it to be a sign of a change in US foreign policy. ...read more.


previous presidents saw this way and that public opinion was in favor of Isolationism to aid America in economic growth during the great depression. However his changing policies occurred to try and keep up with what the people and the Congress wanted or expected. I do not believe that to the full extent Roosevelt didn't have the power to turn and oppose those who were trying to force him to abandon isolationism, yet he did it on his own, for what was best for the US and the recovery from the Great Depression and the Wall St. Crash. To some extent he was forced to give up isolationism to move with the times, but he had to have a motive to not want to fight for isolationism. Roosevelt must have known that abandoning isolationism was the way forward and that interventionism was the new policy to introduce ready for the 'New Deal' policy later. ?? ?? ?? ?? Jon Coupland G3 Feb. 22, 09 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays


    For example, Spain, Germany and France put tariffs on American cars and wheat. As a result, when the American economy did begin to slow down in the latter 1920s, businesses and farmers could not sell their surpluses abroad, which led to a drop in profits, and a reduction in production - with an impact on employment.

  2. How far do you agree with the view that McCarthyism had little impact on ...

    Furthermore, events that happened in Korea only frustrated Americans more and caused them to turn even more anti-communist as many American soldiers died this made the Cold War appear more bitter than it already was. However, it is not just because of McCarthyism that had an impact on America during the 1940s.

  1. Asses the view that Hoovers policies and attitudes in the years 1929-33 merely prolonged ...

    Source 8 also believes that the Hawley-Smoot Tariff was significantly damaging towards Americans "which he signed despite the advice of most economists". This emphasises his attitudes towards his policies, he in his own "fantasy world" as source 7 also describes as he simple did not have any fixed approach towards fixing the damaged economy.

  2. Revision notes - the USA 1945 to 1980

    1952, he was elected to the U.S. Senate and married socialite Jacqueline Bouvier in 1953. Jackie was a great asset to Kennedy, adding a touch of glamour to his campaigns, and becoming a fashion icon of her day. Kennedy was very good on television and was one of the first

  1. a) "How far do these sources support the view expressed in source one that, ...

    2. William fitz Osbern, as a boy William I "loved him above other members of his household". William I and William fitz Osbern were related, as fitz Osbern's father was the grandson of Duke Richard of Normandy's half-brother, Rodulf. Later on Roger Earl of Hereford had to forfeit his land and loose his title as Earl of Hereford.

  2. How far do you agree with the view that the Wall Street crash was ...

    Between 1924-1929 stock price increased greatly. The rise in the stock prices encouraged Americans to purchase shares in the stock market, however the trading activity that occurred wasn't solely out of the interest of investing in a company, but through the beliefs of speculation. Investing into the Bull Market was regarded as being a "get rich

  1. How did Hitler become chancellor in 1933?

    The government had to pay the workers on strike because they proposed that they should go on strike in the first place, which meant that the government was spending money that they really did not have. Hyperinflation took place in 1923, because the Government began printing money in to the billions, in order to pay off the strikers.

  2. Civil Rights Revision Cards 1945-68

    BUT ? agreement finally reached in B fell short of original SCLC demands ? eg ? ?gradual? hiring of black employees and desegregation of facilities, school desegregation left untouched. King accused of ?token? gains. (7) March on Washington ? 250,000 people (quarter = white, shows how successful King had been in gaining support of white pop.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work