• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"A Crusade to make the world safe for democracy" Discuss this interpretation of American motives for entering the war.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"A Crusade to make the world safe for democracy" Discuss this interpretation of American motives for entering the war. History has often shown that altruism is rarely, if ever, the sole basis for a nation entering into war. However, if taken on face value, President Wilson's speech to Congress in April 1917, shows the Great War for America was inspired by lack of self-interest and a noble desire for peace and justice. To see if this interpretation of American motives is true, other reasons such as economic interest, national prestige and future security have to be examined. America's expressed motives have to be assessed upon entrance into the war, in comparison with her conduct during and after the war to determine whether her declared motives were maintained and genuine. The thesis of this essay is that American war motives were based on a mixture of ideals. Whilst economic and security issues played a very significant role in the decision for war, the commitment of many Americans to the preservation of democracy cannot be denied. President Wilson's speech claimed German aggression had become a "challenge to all mankind"1 and that this selfish and autocratic power had to be dealt with in order to "vindicate the principles of peace and justice in the life of the world"2. ...read more.

Middle

So even before the war started "they distrusted the German government, considering it unprincipled and militaristic"10. This made it easier to condemn Germany on moral grounds. This can partly explain why the US took an unofficial pro-ally bias in the first years of the war or as Ernest May calls it "benevolent neutrality"11. It was extremely tolerant towards Britain "violating every rule of international law which it believed might hinder its campaign against German imports"12 offering no meaningful resistance but holding Germany to "Strict Accountability"13. A German triumph would have affected American economic and political interests abroad and created an unfavourable balance of power. This is where the link with democracy comes in because if one democracy was threatened and fell, others might follow. So this help toward Britain can be seen as its unofficial commitment to democracy. It was debated whether national interest required an allied victory and American intervention to prevent German domination. In view of this suspicion of Germany better relations with Britain were fostered and co-operation between the two was advocated to deal with this common problem. Opposition to this came from people like Bryan who didn't believe that a German victory would endanger the US and therefore did not consider it reasonable to go to war or to compromise neutrality by siding with Britain. ...read more.

Conclusion

Historians such as Professor H. Barnes have argued "that far from making the world safe for democracy, the World War succeeded in putting democracy in far greater jeopardy"19. Be that as it may, its refusal to sign the treaty initially can possibly be put down to its disagreements with the harshness of the terms and a wish by the people for the government to concentrate on domestic issues more. Although some historians like Feber argue that Wilson simply "eloquently clothes the bleak skeleton of U.S self-interest in the attractive garb of idealism"20 I would disagree. There was a mixture of motives for going to war but all of them were fused with an ideological commitment to democracy and justice in the world. Indeed, Maldwyn Jones argues, "the US declared war on Germany not because American interest were threatened but because American sentiment was outraged"21. Many of the US leaders felt this way but that is also not denying the existence of other motives such as self and economic interest, national prestige and security issues. The actions of the US confirm these motives and show that the war was partly a crusade to make the world safe for democracy but also a crusade to make the world safe for America. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Introduction to American drama.

    Indeed, in his first attempt to represent on the stage the sical issues of everyday life, using language that approximates to everyday speech and against settings that reproduce the 'real' settings in which these 'people' would have lived. In his later plays, such as Death of a Salesman, he would

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    Why did defectors try to leave the East? * Defectors left because life in the east was dominated by the Communist Party. In East Germany the party exercised greater control than in any other East European state. * The Communist Party also controlled the media.

  1. Free essay

    To what extent are Walter Scott(TM)s novels a product of the Scottish Enlightenment? Discuss ...

    The Scottish Enlightenment attitude to history was characterized by meta-sociological theories of the 'natural progress' of cultures and civilizations (Buchan, 1999). Various scholars of the Scottish Enlightenment have referred to this approach to history as 'natural history or, sometimes, 'conjectural history' (Buchan, 1999: p.45).

  2. history essay 1880 to the present day

    The move was a strange one because the immigrants did not know if this move was of any benefit. There were two major reasons for people immigrating to Britain after 1945. They came either as refugees from the war in Europe or they came from the British colonies to find work.

  1. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    to no apparent result other than the destruction of large parts of the North and heavy loss of life. Meanwhile, the world at large (and many Americans) condemned the U.S. military actions. In April 1965, Johnson began sending American ground troops to Vietnam, the total reaching nearly 550,000 in early 1969.

  2. China After World War II

    been dissipated in the sea of corruption and oppression which has inundated the country. To some extent Chiang Kai-shek has offset the internal isolation of his regime by leaning ever more heavily on his powerful patron across the Pacific - Yankee imperialism, which has now entered as an integral factor into the oppression and robbery of the Chinese people.

  1. History of the United States

    The Middle Atlantic states at first supported the nationalistic Federalists, who won a second term for Washington in 1792 and elected John ADAMS to the presidency in 1796. However, many of the Scots-Irish, Germans, and Dutch in these states disliked Yankees and distrusted financiers and business proprietors.

  2. Describe the impact of Progressive ideals on American foreign policy from 1900 to 1917. ...

    It had protected weak 19th century Latin American nations from powerful European nations. The Roosevelt Corollary, in contrast, stated that "chronic" wrongdoing on the part of Latin American nations entitled the United States to intervene in the affairs of those nations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work