• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalins leadership was the most significant reason for the Soviet victory over Germany in the 1941-45 war Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Stalin's leadership was the most significant reason for the Soviet victory over Germany in the 1941-45 war' When talking of the Great Patriotic war, where between 1941 and 1945 Russia succeeded in pushing back the German forces and eliminating Hitler's fascist dictatorship, many factors must be considered including that of Stalin's leadership and the role he played in the Soviet victory of Germany. The German army invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941 and made swift progress capturing much land with their blitzkrieg tactics working as it had done in the rest of Europe. It did at the beginning look like a victory for the Nazi's may come, however as the German armies swept through Russia, Russia's Red Army and the wartime economy which had been organised by Stalin in his Five year plans could fight back with force. The turning point of the war was the battle of Stalingrad; the ferocity of the fighting used at Stalingrad shocked the Germans, who were used to their Blitzkrieg tactics and were now suddenly fighting only a few yards away from the enemy. In the spring of 1944, a Soviet invasion of Germany became a real possibility, as Soviet troops pursued the retreating German army and after a number of major defeats for Hitler the final victory for the Soviet Union came in the spring of 1945 when soviet soldiers marched into Berlin. Many events and causes led to this final victory some having more significance than others. ...read more.

Middle

However some Soviet historians claim that western interpretations greatly exaggerate the impact of western support and state that the Red army and their abilities had the prime importance when it came down to the defeat of Germany. Stalin's organisation before the war however has been criticised and his desperation to avoid war leading to an alliance with Hitler in 1939 meant that he avoided all the obvious signs that the German forces would invade the Soviet Union, 'It is one of the inexplicable things about him that he remained blind to the fact that Hitler's clear intention was to invade and occupy Russia.'. The purging of many generals and commanders from 1937-41, who had wanted to prepare for war had a great effect on the war, cutting many successful military leaders 'the soviet armies had been decimated by the pre-war purges in their ranks, and they crumbled under the face of the Nazi onslaught'. Also it has been argued that Stalin even had a mental breakdown in the first few weeks of the war but a lot of evidence points away from this now, because even though Stalin retreated making Molotov (one of Stalin's powerful colleagues) make the radio broadcast announcing the German invasion it is believed Stalin was still very active in this period. Some historians such as Kravchenko believed that Stalin and his regime had no part to play in the victory over Germany, he believed 'the whole organization...was caught in the mighty surge of patriotism that came up from the profoundest depths of Russian history... ...read more.

Conclusion

The Nazi atrocities and behaviour in occupied countries certainly did have a significant impact on the German defeat - as it lost them many fighters that could of helped against the mass of Russians they were fighting against. I believe as Richard Overy does, that 'the war effort was not the product of one man, nor could it be made to bend entirely to Stalin's will', such a mass amount of factors effected the soviet victory and the German's defeat and it was a combination of all of these which brought Russia to success. The most significant therefore is rather difficult to pin-point and whether it was Stalin's wartime leadership or just pure luck on the Russians side collectively tying up all these factors led to the USSR winning the war and the Nazi invasion in 1945, bringing Russia into the centre of European discussion and becoming one of the two world's greatest superpowers. A large number of historians have argued of the significance of the factors leading to the victory and many have conflicting views but for me Stalin's leadership wasn't the most significant, certainly it played a part but I think the most significant was the weakness of the German army and this link with how unprepared they were for the weather conditions and terrain of the soviet union, these combining factors meant that Russia and its help from the Serbs who had equipment and skills for winter fighting could make great advancements leading to the retreat of German soldiers from outside Leningrad and the eventual victory in 1945. ?? ?? ?? ?? Beatrice Meecham 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were the Five- Year Plans in transforming Russian industry in the years ...

    4 star(s)

    Working and living conditions were absolutely awful under Stalin and the five year plans. The people were worked to exhaustion and had to live in squalor and cramped conditions. It didn?t make for a good environment. Even though living standards were not part of the plan and therefore are not

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that Stalins suspicions of his western allies between 1941 and 1945 ...

    4 star(s)

    The North African Campaign took place from 10th June 1940 to 13th May 1943. It included battles fought in Libya, Egypt, Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia. Many of the countries fighting in this campaign had North African interests of colonisation and would therefore be vital to prestige and power once the war was over.

  1. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    Furthermore, the effects of Stalin's policies for industry, agriculture and how these policies relate to the state of each of these core areas pre-Stalin that is important in finding out how successful the plans made for Russia were. As stated, taking the basic idea that Stalin caused an increase in

  2. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    o Welch thinks that it helped in overall support,but not in individual policies. It was more successful in reinforcing existing beliefs rather than countering them o Annihilationists- anti-church propaganda was probably counter-productive Be careful Nazi propaganda does not confuse you!

  1. To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges?

    Conquest does see that there was some logic in certain victims as there were failures that required scapegoats, yet it seems entirely illogical to try to improve the economic situation by shooting the best economists and scaring the next best into working harder.12 People could also be jailed for commenting that the five year plans were unrealistic.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    Though the provisional government was only a temporary solution they should not have fallen so soon. Maybe if Kerensky had called a constituent assembly then the Bolshevik wouldn't have seized power so easily. Thought at the start of the provisional government rule the provisional government was popular due to the

  1. 'Stalin's leadership was the most significant reason for Soviet victory over Germany in the ...

    Also there were partisans which focused on irregular forces in opposition to an attacking or occupying power. Soviet partisans, especially those active in Belarus, effectively harassed German troops and significantly hampered their operations in the region. As a result, Soviet authority was re-established deep inside the German-held territories.

  2. Albert Speers Role as German Armaments Minister during the War

    became a naïve young man who lacked morals and ethics and the ability to think critically, as Dan Van der Vat states this also “turned him into an emotional cripple”. He “was an unfinished gem waiting to be shaped and polished to perfection”[3] and Hitler took advantage of this, and moulded him into one of his followers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work