• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The impact of the First World War merely heightened existing social and political tensions which had divided Germany before 1914. How far do you agree with this judgement?

Extracts from this document...


'The impact of the First World War merely heightened existing social and political tensions which had divided Germany before 1914.' How far do you agree with this judgement? Germany's certain tensions politically and socially before 1914 can be seen in forms of the strikes that were taking place to deter the government and the military leaders away from the war, essentially the opposition to go to war. So, this would almost keep the tensions consistent as it was already relatively high. Other political tensions prior to the 1914 mark included the Zabern Affair in 1913 which increased tensions of the Reich as it was a political crisis. However, the tensions could have seen to differ after the war especially with growing opposition. As the Second Reich had a lot of issues already so the 'tensions' themselves were already in full effect and could be seen to only get worse with events such as starting a war that was preventable. Social tensions were as the statement suggests were present before WW1 in Germany. Pressure groups highlighted the divisions and tensions in Germany despite them usually focusing on single issues yet after the economic and social changes they emerged due to these changes. ...read more.


However you could also argue to what extent was this on the same level as a crippling war that destroyed the moral and much more within Germany. Furthermore, Flottenpolitik was another aspect of the tensions that escalated in Germany pre-war. This was due to von Tirpitz pushing a Naval Law to expand the German's navy and a way of bringing ideas together from government policy and popular pressure. This navy push expanded tensions within Germany and tensions between Britain due to the race for a better navy. These hopes, prompted mass production to keep up with the demands of the Navy Laws. This pre-war political movement created certain tensions and shows that it wasn't just WWI that would have merely increased tensions as it shows it would have just about stayed the same. Not only this but other political factors that increased tensions were as certain classes were impacted on like the peasantries were seen to be alienated by the government regulations post food rationings. The urban working classes resented state controls and the middle classes were in an unfamiliar surrounding with for instance no savings that were decreasing in value. ...read more.


The suffering was also seen when the majority of the population were starving due to the navy of Britain. This mainly caused economic problems as it crippled banks so there was a decrease in Germany's production towards the war. Despite relevant differences in tensions before and throughout war it is shown that some factors were more important to show that the judgement must be an increase in tensions. However, certain aspects disagree with the judgement like the burgfrieden. These aspects though, do not compare those to what the war created and the ones the Reichstag created and so the judgement is seen to be true. The judgement that it merely heightened certain tensions is to some extent true even though factors suggest it didn't, and they suggest it lessened or stayed the same. Though, this would be an understatement as a war can only increase devastation and an exhaustion in terms of social and political aspects. Including the fact it would have worn out the moral of the public, given them little hope in those that hoped and predicted a victory, depleted population, a loss to the economy and of course the effect it had on other countries, which would lead to the conclusion that it did heighten the social and political tensions in Germany. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This response focuses well on the question and the author gives careful consideration to pre-war tensions but the counter-argument (ie. the effects of the war) is less well developed. Some grammatical problems. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 06/06/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Weakness of the Directory was the main reasons for Napoleons rise to Power. ...

    5 star(s)

    The political apathy was because the Directory failed to deal with the key problems of finance and war. The Directory inherited a poor financial situation where the assignat was 1% of its original value. Much of France's income was reliant on Napoleon and other generals sending what they had looted

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that Napoleons Empire ...

    5 star(s)

    The interpretation also shows that while people may not have benefited under the direct Empire, they benefited later. For example the interpretation mentions the eradication of small non-viable states in Europe. Interpretations A and D both mention the growth of nationalism inside the subjects of the Napoleonic Empire.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the successes and failures of Mussolini's domestic policy.

    5 star(s)

    It provided entertainment such as cheap holidays, public libraries, free lecture, and theatres much appreciated by the industrious working-class. Major sports were also used to project an image of superiority onto the world; Italy won both the World Cups in 1934 and 1938, and Primo Carrera was World Heavy Weight

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were Nazi economic policies in the years 1933-45?

    4 star(s)

    Therefore the planning of the short and long term needs of the Nazi leadership was confused and disorientated. This would have been a problem if only Germany had established a single, clear and authoritative central control over the economy, for which it lacked. It was also limited by poor standardization.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    As a consequence of this, people fell into poverty. This was exacerbated by the inflation that had started. All of this resulted in the workers and peasants protesting and going on strike. In 1917, there were 1330 strikes with 676,286 strikers, compared to 61 strikes with 31,907 strikers in 1914, before the war.

  2. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    However, what actually remains of Bismarck's Germany today? Geographically, the great German Empire stretching from K�nigsberg in the east to Alsace-Lorraine in the west is hardly as vast today as it was before 1914, due to so much having been given up due to the first and second world wars.

  1. What impact did war have on the French Revolution 1789-1799?

    The war also helped the Jacobins gain enough influence to take power over France. Due to their huge sans-culottes support, the Jacobins were able to use force to gain ascendancy in the Convention that they rarely lost afterwards. The Jacobins used the fear of traitors and counter-revolutionaries in order to

  2. To what extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of the Second World War ...

    Again the evidence, if we take the Intentionalist view is that he had planned a war of aggression from the outset.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work