• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Soviet Union developed its influence in Eastern Europe in the years 1945 1949 because it simply wanted to guarantee its security in the future. How valid is this assessment?

Extracts from this document...


'The Soviet Union was aggressively expansionist and showed little enthusiasm for d�tente.' How valid is this statement? The Soviet Union had been known for being aggressively expansionist in the past, but in d�tente the Soviet Union acted more out of security reasons rather than expansionist such as in Afghanistan which was on the USSR's border and could of possibly handed the USA a geostrategic position over them, also during d�tente they showed real enthusiasm for d�tente and more so than the USA, this spawns from the USSR having a much more serious view of the meaning of d�tente. The statement isn't valid because firstly in the Arab-Israeli and Angola conflicts although they did get involved with aiding one side, the acted second, after the USA which shows that they were acting less out of their 'aggressive expansionist' nature and more out of a response to their rival, the USA. ...read more.


SALT and the basic principles treaties were signed by the USSR even when the USA were trying to play China against the Soviets which shows a degree of commitment. The technology in this is obviously a large factor as the USA had what both the USSR and China wanted. The USSR also showed increased enthusiasm for d�tente in theory. The two superpowers had two very different views on what d�tente was and how it should be or was intended to be operated. The USA saw d�tente as a set of guidelines that should be followed but more importantly they saw it as a chance to exploit the USSR. On the other hand, the Soviets saw d�tente as a more strict set of rules and aims that would have to be achieved if there was ever to be peace, the severity of this outlook on d�tente shows an increased commitment. ...read more.


The USSR can also be criticised in d�tente for its contribution in Angola, with Cuba already involved they didn't really need to become involved as there was already one communist nation supporting the MPLA. It can be seen as the USSR were acting in Angola to counter the USA's and China's involvement rather than for the preservation of communism. To conclude it isn't fair to agree with the statement because throughout d�tente the USSR showed enthusiasm, often that greater than the USA's and were only aggressively expansionist over Afghanistan and that can be argued that it was for security. The main point regarded the USSR's enthusiasm is that they perceived d�tente to be much more important and have a greater meaning on a global scale than the USA and they weren't aggressively expansionist due to them not putting troops on the ground in places outside their sphere of influence (Arab-Israeli and Angola conflicts) and were acting in response to the USA getting involved in these places first. ?? ?? ?? ?? Ryan Wheatley ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

There are many positive features of this response; the author writes analytically throughout and stays firmly focused on the precise question in each paragraph. Judgements are sound and usually supported by evidence, although this could be expanded in places. However, the lack of dates is a weakness and grammatical errors detract from the clarity of the argument. 4 stars .

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 04/04/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Asses the successes and failures of Mao's domestic policies between 1949 and 1976."

    5 star(s)

    Many were opposed to this system as it meant they had to give up the land they had fought to own privately; by 1957, more than 90% of peasants belonged to co-operatives. During the 1950's villagers were taught the basic reading and writing skill by the party workers as Mao was only interested in simple literary skills.

  2. Why did the USA become involved in the Korean War in the years 1950-53?

    the conflict as SU was absent from the meeting having withdrawn form the security council because the UN had given Chinas seat to Taiwan instead of the Peoples Republic of China.

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    But after Bismarck's resignation, his policy was dropped. * 1894: France and Russia signed the Dual Entente, which was intended to be a counterweight to the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy. * 1904: Britain and France signed The Entente Cordiale, the friendly agreement. It was not a treaty as such, but a settling of long-standing sources of friction.

  2. How far were White weaknesses responsible for Red success in Russian Civil War?

    over in November 1919, it did so with the willing participation of large numbers of peasant recruits. Moreover, one may argue that had the help offered by the Allies been more enthusiastic, the Whites may have been able to mend their military weaknesses, as the supplies sent in 1919 were

  1. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    Therefore, Stalin's involvement in other areas of Europe pushed the US towards a hard-line attitude, thus reinforcing antagonism between the two powers. Moreover, a similar attitude was adopted in Iran, proving to be the first crisis for the UN, ending in Stalin abandoning the local communists.

  2. To what extent did the foreign intervention influence the outcome of the Spanish Civil ...

    such as the Texas Oil Company, Texaco, Shell, Standard of New Jersey and the Atlantic Refining Company traded oil with Franco and this was vital factor which contributed in the outcome of the Spanish Civil War because according to Whealey "without oil, the Generalissimo's war machines would have ground to a halt."

  1. Assessing the impact of the first world war on international relations in the decade ...

    with these smaller states in that there was dependability between these states. For example in the case of France whose major eastern ally since 1892, Russia materially weak and politically hostile, French's security needs would be doubly served against Germany and against Bolsheviks.8 The other reason for new international order

  2. Why was the Six-day War of 1967 a Significant Turning Point in the History ...

    By the 8th of June Israel had taken the west bank and reached the river Jordan. By the 9th of June Israeli troops had control of the whole area up to the Suez Canal. On the Syrian front the Golan Heights had been taken by the 10th of June.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work