Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Soviet Union developed its influence in Eastern Europe in the years 1945 1949 because it simply wanted to guarantee its security in the future. How valid is this assessment?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'The Soviet Union was aggressively expansionist and showed little enthusiasm for d�tente.' How valid is this statement? The Soviet Union had been known for being aggressively expansionist in the past, but in d�tente the Soviet Union acted more out of security reasons rather than expansionist such as in Afghanistan which was on the USSR's border and could of possibly handed the USA a geostrategic position over them, also during d�tente they showed real enthusiasm for d�tente and more so than the USA, this spawns from the USSR having a much more serious view of the meaning of d�tente. The statement isn't valid because firstly in the Arab-Israeli and Angola conflicts although they did get involved with aiding one side, the acted second, after the USA which shows that they were acting less out of their 'aggressive expansionist' nature and more out of a response to their rival, the USA. ...read more.

Middle

SALT and the basic principles treaties were signed by the USSR even when the USA were trying to play China against the Soviets which shows a degree of commitment. The technology in this is obviously a large factor as the USA had what both the USSR and China wanted. The USSR also showed increased enthusiasm for d�tente in theory. The two superpowers had two very different views on what d�tente was and how it should be or was intended to be operated. The USA saw d�tente as a set of guidelines that should be followed but more importantly they saw it as a chance to exploit the USSR. On the other hand, the Soviets saw d�tente as a more strict set of rules and aims that would have to be achieved if there was ever to be peace, the severity of this outlook on d�tente shows an increased commitment. ...read more.

Conclusion

The USSR can also be criticised in d�tente for its contribution in Angola, with Cuba already involved they didn't really need to become involved as there was already one communist nation supporting the MPLA. It can be seen as the USSR were acting in Angola to counter the USA's and China's involvement rather than for the preservation of communism. To conclude it isn't fair to agree with the statement because throughout d�tente the USSR showed enthusiasm, often that greater than the USA's and were only aggressively expansionist over Afghanistan and that can be argued that it was for security. The main point regarded the USSR's enthusiasm is that they perceived d�tente to be much more important and have a greater meaning on a global scale than the USA and they weren't aggressively expansionist due to them not putting troops on the ground in places outside their sphere of influence (Arab-Israeli and Angola conflicts) and were acting in response to the USA getting involved in these places first. ?? ?? ?? ?? Ryan Wheatley ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

There are many positive features of this response; the author writes analytically throughout and stays firmly focused on the precise question in each paragraph. Judgements are sound and usually supported by evidence, although this could be expanded in places. However, the lack of dates is a weakness and grammatical errors detract from the clarity of the argument. 4 stars .

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 04/04/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    would be guaranteed, but ever since the post-war conferences, the West had refused to punish Germany as harshly. In 1947-1948 tension arose because it became apparent that the Western allies were going to go ahead with a separate West Germany and incorporate West Berlin into that state.

  2. Why did the Central Powers lose the First World War?

    where over 250 tanks where put into action which later resulted in the end of the war. Alternatively, aircrafts played an important part for the allies and the central powers in the war. They started off as scouts used to spy and take pictures of enemy troops and positions and

  1. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five year plan in 1958 and to ...

    The Agarian Reform Law of 1950 gave land to about 300 million peasants, About half of whom were able to farm their land by themselves. The rest, whose fields were too small or who did not own farming tools banded together in mutual-aid teams, sharing equipment and animals.

  2. To what extent did the foreign intervention influence the outcome of the Spanish Civil ...

    Consequently, "Multinational corporations in the sterling dollar countries...helped to crush the Spanish Republicans' hopes". On the other hand, the Stalin provided the Republicans with over 1000 aircraft, 200 tanks, 1500 guns and 500 to 5,000 advisers who were ordered by Stalin to "keep out of artillery range".

  1. To What extent was German Foreign Policy responsible for the outbreak of general European ...

    In 1896 he had sent a telegram to the Transvaal President Kruger congratulating him after he had destroyed an attempted British uprising. In 1905 he paid a visit to Tangier and this precipitated the Moroccan crisis6. On the other hand when it actually came to going to war in 1914 he desperately tried to find a way out.

  2. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five-year plan in 1958 and to what ...

    To do this Mao introduced the 'second five year plan', which he called the 'Great Leap Forward'. When Mao received financial aid from Russia in 1950, he described this as 'getting meat out of the mouth of a tiger'. Mao knew it was dangerous but also knew it was the only way to develop China.

  1. How far do you think Bloody Sunday was a turning point in the course ...

    Also it is argued Bloody Sunday simply built up what already existed in Northern Ireland. The PIRA, Provisional Irish Republican Army, campaign against Northern Ireland being part of the United Kingdom had begun two years before the events of Bloody Sunday, but views of the day increased the status of and recruitment into the Republican Army.

  2. The conclusion of the missile crisis was absolute proof that the USAs strategy of ...

    The crisis also led to a growing awareness of the need to create some control over the nuclear arms race as it was evident that the arms race brought nothing but immense negative pressure to world security. The Nuclear Test Ban treaty was signed in 1963, which banned the testing of nuclear weapons above ground and under water.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work