• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Soviet Union developed its influence in Eastern Europe in the years 1945 1949 because it simply wanted to guarantee its security in the future. How valid is this assessment?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'The Soviet Union was aggressively expansionist and showed little enthusiasm for d�tente.' How valid is this statement? The Soviet Union had been known for being aggressively expansionist in the past, but in d�tente the Soviet Union acted more out of security reasons rather than expansionist such as in Afghanistan which was on the USSR's border and could of possibly handed the USA a geostrategic position over them, also during d�tente they showed real enthusiasm for d�tente and more so than the USA, this spawns from the USSR having a much more serious view of the meaning of d�tente. The statement isn't valid because firstly in the Arab-Israeli and Angola conflicts although they did get involved with aiding one side, the acted second, after the USA which shows that they were acting less out of their 'aggressive expansionist' nature and more out of a response to their rival, the USA. ...read more.

Middle

SALT and the basic principles treaties were signed by the USSR even when the USA were trying to play China against the Soviets which shows a degree of commitment. The technology in this is obviously a large factor as the USA had what both the USSR and China wanted. The USSR also showed increased enthusiasm for d�tente in theory. The two superpowers had two very different views on what d�tente was and how it should be or was intended to be operated. The USA saw d�tente as a set of guidelines that should be followed but more importantly they saw it as a chance to exploit the USSR. On the other hand, the Soviets saw d�tente as a more strict set of rules and aims that would have to be achieved if there was ever to be peace, the severity of this outlook on d�tente shows an increased commitment. ...read more.

Conclusion

The USSR can also be criticised in d�tente for its contribution in Angola, with Cuba already involved they didn't really need to become involved as there was already one communist nation supporting the MPLA. It can be seen as the USSR were acting in Angola to counter the USA's and China's involvement rather than for the preservation of communism. To conclude it isn't fair to agree with the statement because throughout d�tente the USSR showed enthusiasm, often that greater than the USA's and were only aggressively expansionist over Afghanistan and that can be argued that it was for security. The main point regarded the USSR's enthusiasm is that they perceived d�tente to be much more important and have a greater meaning on a global scale than the USA and they weren't aggressively expansionist due to them not putting troops on the ground in places outside their sphere of influence (Arab-Israeli and Angola conflicts) and were acting in response to the USA getting involved in these places first. ?? ?? ?? ?? Ryan Wheatley ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

There are many positive features of this response; the author writes analytically throughout and stays firmly focused on the precise question in each paragraph. Judgements are sound and usually supported by evidence, although this could be expanded in places. However, the lack of dates is a weakness and grammatical errors detract from the clarity of the argument. 4 stars .

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 04/04/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent did the foreign intervention influence the outcome of the Spanish Civil ...

    posts outside Spain in order to avoid uprisings against the new government from the right. As a result of these measures, Spain's economy was severely damaged due that the wealthy people started taking huge amounts of capital outside the country.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * The Russians, like the Serbs, were Slavs. They did not want Austrian influence to extend into the Balkans and were prepared to protect the Serbs from Austrian advances Italy Italy was a new country that had yet to find its feet amongst the great powers.

  1. Why did the Communists come to power in China in 1949?

    After the Japanese were fully removed from China, the CCP took advantage of their location and quickly moved into liberation areas. These liberation areas saw the implementation of reforms seen in already significant soviets such as Yanan. This brought more people to see the fantastic leadership the CCP could bring to China.

  2. How far were White weaknesses responsible for Red success in Russian Civil War?

    These were highly reminiscent of the tsarist regime and sometimes provided oppression and terror to an even greater extent, as in Donbass, an industrial centre controlled by the Whites, one in ten workers would be shot if production fell. This clearly diminished support from the public and drove people into the hands of the Reds.

  1. Assessing the impact of the first world war on international relations in the decade ...

    They had most of their population, resources and markets. Austria's largely German population had wanted to unite with Germany, but the Peace treaties forbid that Union.7This was because the peacemakers did not want German to gain territory after the war. On the broader view, these problems cemented the relationship between powerful states (like Britain and France)

  2. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    he was unwilling to tolerate any other kind of government, even communist, unless it was controlled by the USSR. This gave way to rising tensions between the two superpowers and validated the Americans' theory of the Russian expansionist ideology. However, USSR was not only provocative in trying to establish its

  1. The Bay of Pigs Invasion

    Kennedy had originally authorized forty B-26 sorties against Castro's force, however, after the last minute cuts, only eight were flown (Hawkins 3). By the time the fighting ended about one hundred men were killed and the rest were taken prisoner (Encyclopedia of U.S.

  2. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    The United States gave military aid to Chiang. In 1949, Chiang and his government fled to Taiwan. This made China a part of the Communists. North Korean troops invaded South Korea on June 25, 1950, and the Korean War began.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work