• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is it true to say the Provisional Government faced an impossible task?

Extracts from this document...


'To what extent is it true to say the Provisional Government faced an impossible task?' Although the Romanov Dynasty had ruled Russia for over 300 years, once its demise had begun it took only a few days for Tsardom to fall. Immediately after this collapse the whole country seemed to breathe a sigh of relief as it entered into a 'honeymoon' period during which time exuberance and celebration was rife throughout Russia. However, the fact remained that although hopes and expectations were high regarding how Russia's new government could better the lives of the Russian people and the future of Russia itself, the new Provisional Government still had to face those same problems that the Tsarist government had failed to solve; such as the ever deteriorating economy, the social unrest and the diabolical living standards in the towns and cities, all of which were exacerbated by Russia's involvement in the war. The newly formed Provisional Government also had problems of its own to face, such as its controversial claims to legitimacy and the threat posed to it by the possible return of some of Russia's most dangerous and influential exiles. Some historians believe that the Provisional Government faced an impossible task, due to the troubles it inherited but also due to the mistakes that the Provisional Government itself made which worsened the condition of the task they faced. Given these circumstances then, it is perhaps not surprising that the Provisional Government struggled to deliver what was expected and it has even been argued that when the Provisional Government took control over Russia it inherited a 'poison chalice', but to what extent is this the case and to what extent did the Provisional Government themselves contribute to making their own task impossible? ...read more.


This factor would not have endeared them to the Russian people, nor would it have done anything to help the fact that they were supposed to be trying to gain their respect and support, as it showed the Provisional Government as being weak and unable to assert themselves. The biggest challenge from the Soviet to the Provisional Government's authority however, came as the news of the Tsar's fall spread, causing soviets to be elected all over Russia who soon started sending representatives to the Petrograd Soviet. The Soviet could now claim to be more representative that the Provisional Government itself, which came as a massive blow to the Government because it made it even harder for them to get the Russian people on their side; to support them and to obey them. Another great threat to the Provisional Government was the leader of the Bolshevik party, Lenin. In the months after the February Revolution up until April 1917, the Petrograd Bolsheviks had accepted the Dual Authority as part of a genuine revolution and they had been willing to work with other revolutionary and reformist parties, however Lenin's return changed all that. On his arrival at Petrograd's Finland Station on April 3rd, he stood up in front of the crowd and condemned the recently formed Provisional Government, claiming that the February Revolution, far from giving Russia political freedom, had simply created a 'parliamentary-bourgeois republic'. He went on to release his April Theses in which he rejected the idea of a dual authority and stated that the Revolution had not been genuine at all, but rather had been a coup which had given the authority to ex-tsarist aristocrats and the bourgeoisie alone. ...read more.


The government however, wanted to remain in the war for fear that if they pulled out they would lose not only land to the Germans, but that they would also lose Russia's foreign investors, which were an essential part of Russia's economy. The fact that the government refused to listen to the wants of the ordinary Russian people in relation to the war right from the very start made them reluctant to obey the Provisional Government and many began to challenge its authenticity. In conclusion, the claim that the Provisional Government faced an impossible task holds great weight and was almost certainly true towards the end of the Provisional Government's reign, however it didn't necessarily start out this way. Although Russia's economic turmoil and social problems together faced the new Provisional Government with an extremely difficult and complex task, the task they faced may have been solved by another assembly had they been left in charge of the country, but the Provisional Government's continuous mistakes and problems eventually led to their task becoming impossible. Had they not faced accusations over their authenticity and legitimacy, or hostilities towards their wholly middle and upper class membership they would almost certainly have had a better beginning to their period in office and could have enjoyed a higher chance of survival. As it stands however, the Provisional Government were unable to cope with the problems which they had inherited from the Romanovs, let alone the fresh problems that began to stack up against them once in office such as their uncertain claims to legitimacy and the threat posed to them by the Petrograd Soviet and the return of dangerous Russian exiles, and eventually they managed to turn a task which had started out as being almost impossible but not quite, into one which was completely unachievable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. How successfully did the Labour governments of 1945-51 solve the social problems of the ...

    was far from Labour's socialist goal of breaking down barriers in society, and therefore a limiting factor in their success. The government also tried to implement the 1944 Fleming Report which recommended that 25% of places at public schools should be reserved for pupils with local authority scholarships, but Pearce

  2. To What Extent Was The South African War (1899 - 1902) A Capitalist War

    impact on the Soviet economy than it would make on other international financial players. So, to accept Lenin's theory, one can easily believe that the South African War began due to pure capitalism as well as capitalism being the highest stage of imperialism.

  1. Which of these judgements best Reflects the State of Imperial Russia in 1914? By ...

    Russia's involvement in WW1 seems to be what moved Russia from evolution to revolution. Initially on the declaration of war Nicholas was supported in a surge of patriotism that leads one to believe that had the war been properly managed and not ended in complete and unparalleled disaster the effect on Russia may have been considerably different.

  2. How effective were National Government of 1931-1939 in dealing with the problem of unemployment? 20 ...

    The test even looked at all the value of things in the home that could be sold to raise cash. The means test was extremely unpopular. It was humiliating for families to have to reveal earnings, savings and the value of things they owned.

  1. How far was the Provisional Government responsible for its own downfall

    This was a fatal blow to the authority of the Provisional government and led directly to the July Days a series of riots and demonstrations in Petrograd, Therefore the provisional government can be seen responsible for its own downfall, as it was their decision to continue with the War.

  2. To what extent was Napoleon a Dictator

    job, because when you leave the employer would write about you, and this would normally not be a good reference making it harder to get a new job. These reforms were clearly defining people's rights, however are indicative of a dictatorship as it was largely illiberal.

  1. How effective was the leadership provided by prominent individual nationalists in Malaya?

    However, it is not fair to blame the social hierarchy for the lack of popular support for Ibrahim's goals, as he could have improved on his effectiveness in gaining popular support after realising that his ideas did not appeal to the common Malay man, evident in the fact that Ibrahim

  2. To what extent had the Russian economy been successfully modernised by 1914?

    rate to those the peasants received, which allowed the nobles easier access to land. This highlights the Tsars wish to maintain the traditional Russian hierarchy, which can be seen as something they valued over the development of the economy. The nobles were also able to decide which part of their

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work