• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is it true to say the Provisional Government faced an impossible task?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'To what extent is it true to say the Provisional Government faced an impossible task?' Although the Romanov Dynasty had ruled Russia for over 300 years, once its demise had begun it took only a few days for Tsardom to fall. Immediately after this collapse the whole country seemed to breathe a sigh of relief as it entered into a 'honeymoon' period during which time exuberance and celebration was rife throughout Russia. However, the fact remained that although hopes and expectations were high regarding how Russia's new government could better the lives of the Russian people and the future of Russia itself, the new Provisional Government still had to face those same problems that the Tsarist government had failed to solve; such as the ever deteriorating economy, the social unrest and the diabolical living standards in the towns and cities, all of which were exacerbated by Russia's involvement in the war. The newly formed Provisional Government also had problems of its own to face, such as its controversial claims to legitimacy and the threat posed to it by the possible return of some of Russia's most dangerous and influential exiles. Some historians believe that the Provisional Government faced an impossible task, due to the troubles it inherited but also due to the mistakes that the Provisional Government itself made which worsened the condition of the task they faced. Given these circumstances then, it is perhaps not surprising that the Provisional Government struggled to deliver what was expected and it has even been argued that when the Provisional Government took control over Russia it inherited a 'poison chalice', but to what extent is this the case and to what extent did the Provisional Government themselves contribute to making their own task impossible? ...read more.

Middle

This factor would not have endeared them to the Russian people, nor would it have done anything to help the fact that they were supposed to be trying to gain their respect and support, as it showed the Provisional Government as being weak and unable to assert themselves. The biggest challenge from the Soviet to the Provisional Government's authority however, came as the news of the Tsar's fall spread, causing soviets to be elected all over Russia who soon started sending representatives to the Petrograd Soviet. The Soviet could now claim to be more representative that the Provisional Government itself, which came as a massive blow to the Government because it made it even harder for them to get the Russian people on their side; to support them and to obey them. Another great threat to the Provisional Government was the leader of the Bolshevik party, Lenin. In the months after the February Revolution up until April 1917, the Petrograd Bolsheviks had accepted the Dual Authority as part of a genuine revolution and they had been willing to work with other revolutionary and reformist parties, however Lenin's return changed all that. On his arrival at Petrograd's Finland Station on April 3rd, he stood up in front of the crowd and condemned the recently formed Provisional Government, claiming that the February Revolution, far from giving Russia political freedom, had simply created a 'parliamentary-bourgeois republic'. He went on to release his April Theses in which he rejected the idea of a dual authority and stated that the Revolution had not been genuine at all, but rather had been a coup which had given the authority to ex-tsarist aristocrats and the bourgeoisie alone. ...read more.

Conclusion

The government however, wanted to remain in the war for fear that if they pulled out they would lose not only land to the Germans, but that they would also lose Russia's foreign investors, which were an essential part of Russia's economy. The fact that the government refused to listen to the wants of the ordinary Russian people in relation to the war right from the very start made them reluctant to obey the Provisional Government and many began to challenge its authenticity. In conclusion, the claim that the Provisional Government faced an impossible task holds great weight and was almost certainly true towards the end of the Provisional Government's reign, however it didn't necessarily start out this way. Although Russia's economic turmoil and social problems together faced the new Provisional Government with an extremely difficult and complex task, the task they faced may have been solved by another assembly had they been left in charge of the country, but the Provisional Government's continuous mistakes and problems eventually led to their task becoming impossible. Had they not faced accusations over their authenticity and legitimacy, or hostilities towards their wholly middle and upper class membership they would almost certainly have had a better beginning to their period in office and could have enjoyed a higher chance of survival. As it stands however, the Provisional Government were unable to cope with the problems which they had inherited from the Romanovs, let alone the fresh problems that began to stack up against them once in office such as their uncertain claims to legitimacy and the threat posed to them by the Petrograd Soviet and the return of dangerous Russian exiles, and eventually they managed to turn a task which had started out as being almost impossible but not quite, into one which was completely unachievable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. To what extent did WW1 cause the collapse of Tsarism?

    Nicholas' wife, Alexandra, was left in power of Russia as her husband thought it best to lead the army himself on the front in 1915. Signs of a failing autocracy were shown as Nicholas II was still just as weak willed and indecisive; he would not get far if he wished to lead the army himself.

  2. How far was the Provisional Government responsible for its own downfall

    This was a fatal blow to the authority of the Provisional government and led directly to the July Days a series of riots and demonstrations in Petrograd, Therefore the provisional government can be seen responsible for its own downfall, as it was their decision to continue with the War.

  1. To what extent had the Russian economy been successfully modernised by 1914?

    land they would give up and consequently the peasants got the worst land, and the landlords often only gave up one thirds of their land to the peasants. Many peasants, were therefore reduced to buying small strips of land which yielded little food or profit.

  2. 'Financially dependent, without property and denied a political and legal status.' To what extent ...

    Many prosperous women were into direct investments in shipping enterprises and trading careers. One of many was Alice Horsford who owned half of the vessel, Saynte Mariebot. Even when they were widowed and had to close business deals that their husbands had started, they did not call into financial instability nor were they denied their legal status.

  1. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    Meanwhile, Conrad III, Louis VII, Patriarch of Jerusalem and the king held a secret council of the true purpose of the crusade and decided by all available forces capture Damascus, which promised them a rich booty. But with such a solution, they only pushed the Syrian ruler to embrace the

  2. How accurate is it to say that the controversy over indulgences were merely the ...

    Erasmus had critised Paul II for his abuses. Christian Humanists believed as Luther did in internal reform within the church by returning the original scripture for guidance where they believed they would meet the ? True Christ?.

  1. Despite frequent changes in policy, Russian and Soviet governments were spectacularly unsuccessful in securing ...

    Industry picked up, but there were still issues and it was the common man who had to pay. The economy still suffered, although, arguably, not as much as it would have done without Witte. However, the tertiary sector also contributed to the economy.

  2. To What Extent Was Russia Modernised During the Personal Reign of Peter the Great? ...

    where he would always be seen as clean shaven and with a more westernised style of clothing. It was supposed to show to other European leaders that Peter was not the barbarian they believed him or Russia to be and it was meant to show the Russian people that this

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work