• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"A leap in the dark." How accurate is this assessment of the 1867 Reform Act in relation to the parliamentary system and the Conservative Party?

Extracts from this document...


"A leap in the dark." How accurate is this assessment of the 1867 Reform Act in relation to the parliamentary system and the Conservative Party? The metaphor "a leap in the dark" was made by Lord Derby, Prime Minister from 1866 to 68 who was referring to the 1867 reform act and the risks it posed. The 1867 reform act essentially overhauled the voting system due to the electorate being approximately doubled from 1.36 million people to 2.46 million. Derby was initially hesitant to accept such a radical bill as he didn't know how this would change the political system. The only probable reason for Derby's acceptance of the reform act is because of Disraeli and his idea of Tory Democracy which meant the conservative party forming an affiliation with the working class. ...read more.


This however was the wrong approach and the Liberals took advantage of the mistakes the conservatives had made and they decided to appeal to the new members of the electorate by travelling around the country and making speeches to gain support from them. Because of the clever Liberal tactics, the conservatives actually lost the 1868 election even though they were the ones who had effectively given the vote to a proportion of working class men when introducing the reform act. This exhibits Disraeli's and the rest of the conservative party's ignorance to the changes the reform bill was going to bring about. The desperation of the conservatives was evident as they scrambled to gain support from the population and so obviously they took a massive risk or "a leap in the dark." ...read more.


They took the risk anyway and in due course, Cranbourne and two of his supporters resigned. Because of the pressures coming from within parliament and outside it too, Derby was probably correct in saying it was "a leap in the dark" as he obviously did not fully support all the terms of the bill but he knew that there was unrest and frustration coming from the working class because of disease epidemics and other misfortunes. Therefore, he knew that the conservative party had to act quickly to ultimately gain the trust and support of the working class and to put Disraeli's idea of Tory Democracy in practice by forging alliances with them. This definitely "a leap in the dark" but Derby was willing to take a risk for the greater good. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. An unmitigated disaster. How valid is this assessment of Oliver Cromwells experiment with the ...

    It also states that they had to deal with many problems that halted or hindered the Major Generals' authority such as the lack of local connections or social status. However, even with this in place, the Major Generals were able to continue to use their power and carry on with their instructions.

  2. Why did the Conservative Party pass the Second Reform Act?

    The Liberals had been reluctant to lower the property qualification to below �6, as they were unsure as to where the unskilled workers' allegiances would lie. The Conservatives believed they could capture these votes due to the influence of masters, though this assumption proved to be wrong in the 1868 General Election.

  1. How successful was the Reform Act in rectifying defects in the political system?

    If a Reform Act was not passed soon then it was possible that another incident such as this may have occurred in the near future and the government could not risk this possibility. Due to previous riots and problems, like Peterloo, the Reform Act was desperately needed to rectify all

  2. "A Leap in the Dark"? Was Lord Derby's Judgement of the second reform act ...

    Their belief in protectionism was seen as out of date, yet this was their only distinct policy. There was great rivalry between Disraeli and Gladstone, both obviously the rising stars of their respective groups, and very ambitious. Lord Derby was also weak, seeming unenthusiastic.

  1. "A leap in the dark" Was Lord Derby's view of The Second Reform Act ...

    Disraeli's personal interest shows that The Second Reform Act was not simply an unprovoked "Leap in the dark" but something that it's propagator had prepared and wanted to do for longer than just the present; The Second Reform Act was in this way not "A leap in the dark".

  2. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    and tactical shrewdness in the manner in which Henry II introduced such a ploy.42 Indeed it would appears Henry's desire to erect a new administrative zeal and impetus was evident from the start of his reign may have matured into intense frustrations at the pace, which his reforms took prior

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work