• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"A Leap in the Dark"? Was Lord Derby's Judgement of the second reform act 1867 fair given the limitations of the Act?

Extracts from this document...


A2 History - Mr Finny "A Leap in the Dark"? Was Lord Derby's Judgement of the second reform act 1867 fair given the limitations of the Act? In 1867 a Conservative government lead by Lord Derby passed, what was a fairly radical Reform Bill, enabling a further 1.2 million adult males to be eligible for the vote. There was either a change in the Conservative mindset brought on by either inside or outside pressure, or there were benefits for the Conservatives to pass such a bill themselves. Since the first reform act the Tory Party had not won a single election and since Lord Palmerston's death, reform was back on the agenda, as he was anti-reform. Unhappiness due to the first reform caused agitation from the working classes and put pressure on MPs to reform and the general consensus was that greater democracy was called for. Was Lord Derby really influenced by the American and Italian spirit of democracy? Or did Lord Derby think that he could gain from it, like the Liberals had in 1932? Disraeli's was the real motivation behind The Second Reform Act, Lord Derby had little to do with the bill's creation or passage but let Disraeli go through with it nonetheless. ...read more.


In truth Disraeli performed an adept bit of political tactics; by presenting a more moderate reform bill in the commons and using the radical Liberals to make amendments that radicalised the Act he was able to get the bill past the Whigs and still have the Act he wanted in the end. This was a calculated move and a radical reform bill would be the best tool to use to aggravate an already disputing party; The Second Reform Act was used as a means to exploit weaknesses already present in the Liberal Party and those weaknesses were certainly not unknown, or in "the dark", to the Conservatives. The Conservative Party presented a bill to which the changes that it made would not really affect the Tory Party's chances of being elected. The Second Reform Act was a less radical reform than it at first appears. The Act added 1.1 million voters to the previous total of 1.4million, almost doubling the electorate; the real trick to the Act was that most of the new votes were created in borough constituencies where the Liberals were most popular and only created more Liberal voting people - thus the Liberal Party did not gain any more constituencies. ...read more.


The terms of the Act show that it was not actually far reaching enough to make massive changes to Britain as a whole - thought the Liberal Party would still be seen as the working class party, the Tories would still be seen as the appealing party to the wealthier people in society. The Tory Party knew what they were doing in presenting an apparently radical bill and were only appeasing the popular pressure groups at this time with political trickery, the thought of fairness and democracy did not enter the minds of these politicians and the bill was certainly not the unprecedented act of generosity which Lord Derby's statement implies that it is. Though the in the passage through parliament Disraeli did not entirely know what to expect and although the effect the Act would have on politics in Britain was not entirely clear, it was certainly less than "A leap in the dark". Disraeli and Lord Derby tried to appear to be making an unpredictable move of generosity and democracy when it was in fact a quite cunningly devised plan to consolidate the Tory electorate and destroy opposition from the Liberal Party? American Civil War was fought over slavery and democracy. Italy recently unified and the spirit of democracy was also fought for there. Historians and novelists wrote inspired books about democracy and this had influenced some British MPs. 30th September 2004 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did Disraeli pass the 1867 Second Reform Act?

    3 star(s)

    The majority, and probably the main reasons that Disraeli passed the 1867 Second Reform Act were purely personal affairs, the main one of these being the chance to gain power in Parliament. It was nearing the end of Derby's administration and Disraeli wished to succeed him as the leader of

  2. To what extent was Disraeli personally committed to social reform

    is the elevation of the condition of the people.' However despite the obvious turning point noted by historians to be around 1872 one can clearly assess the view that the speeches were a mere presentational stunt, highlighting as Brasher dubs the "showman Disraeli"6.

  1. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    economical slump and this meant, like in Britain, between 1810 and 1825 there were severe agricultural problems. This was one of the causes of the French Revolution because it increased the French people's problems and made their anger stronger. This was also the case in Britain between 1810 and 1825 because there were many agricultural problems.

  2. Resistance to slavery.

    white planters, give assistance to the government when required also two white superintendent would live in each maroon village to oversee and maintain a friendly correspondence. The second maroon war stated in1795-1796 because the maroon realized that the treaty was more beneficial to the whites and was not fair as

  1. "A leap in the dark" Was Lord Derby's view of The Second Reform Act ...

    Disraeli's personal interest shows that The Second Reform Act was not simply an unprovoked "Leap in the dark" but something that it's propagator had prepared and wanted to do for longer than just the present; The Second Reform Act was in this way not "A leap in the dark".

  2. Why did the Tories pass the Reform Bill in 1867?

    through as a cynical, opportunist act to gain a political advantage over the Liberals. At the time it was stated that Conservatives ?were stealing the Liberal?s clothes?. The scepticism surrounding Disraeli?s motives is valid, as despite being a powerful figure in the Conservative Party, Disraeli did not have the trust of his party.

  1. "A leap in the dark." How accurate is this assessment of the 1867 Reform ...

    Another risk or "a leap in the dark" the conservatives faced when proposing the 1867 reform bill was the fact that they would upset a number of people including other key conservatives such as Cranbourne who greatly opposed any branch of reform.

  2. How far was popular pressure the most important reason for the passing of the ...

    Moreover the public were disappointed as Gladstone seemed to have promised reform as a result there was an increase in pressure for reform when the Derby/Disraeli government came into power. Disraeli had always wanted a sort of democracy ? an alliance between the aristocracy and the urban workers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work