• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Political Failure and the Butcher of the Dardanelles! How Far do You Agree with This Assessment of Churchills Career Between 1902 and 1918?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"A Political Failure and the Butcher of the Dardanelles!" - How Far do You Agree with This Assessment of Churchill's Career Between 1902 and 1918? When people think of Winston Churchill, a majority will think of his being Prime Minister during the Second World War and the victories that stemmed from this. However, Churchill wasn't always a successful politician, starting off in the army and having to work his way from MP of Oldham to Prime Minister of Britain. The period of 1902-1918 saw a mixture of success and failure. In the early years of his political career, Churchill was the Conservative MP for Oldham, but he resigned from the party in 1905, when they pulled out of government. Churchill was made a junior minister in the new Liberal government, who won the 1906 vote with a landslide victory. It was in this party where Churchill met David Lloyd George, who was, like Churchill, was very interested in the idea of social reform. ...read more.

Middle

Churchill was very proud of the role he had acquired, and poured out all of his ideas to the senior commanders, with their lifetime experience. He was ready to hold the position and he demonstrated the adoration. This was a major high point in his political career, and it was with great excitement that he entered the First World War. An enthusiastic man, Churchill was ready to demonstrate his ability in the role of First Lord of the Admiralty during World War One. However, it was here where people began to question his ability. This stemmed from the huge failure of Gallipoli, in 1915, the same year in which Churchill lost his impressive title. The Gallipoli expedition was meant to result in the defeat of the Ottoman Empire, but the Turkish had the backing of the Germans. They were more prepared than Britain could expect. ...read more.

Conclusion

be wrong, looking at what he has done for our country, but this period of his career was darkened by the Gallipoli expedition, which resulted in the loss of his title; something that caused Churchill great pain. However, the fact he received this title in the first place is enough to suggest he was actually a highly competent politician, and it would be wrong to let one, albeit large, mistake darken his entire career. As for being the 'butcher' of the Dardanelles, it wasn't Churchill's fault entirely. He wasn't given good enough resources for the attack, and he had an incompetent commander in charge, overseas. Also, the Turks had the backing of Germany, therefore they were more prepared than Britain had realised. This failure helped Churchill in the long run, with the D Day victory in World War Two going well because Churchill now knew how not to make an attack. ?? ?? ?? ?? [1]- OCR History A Churchill 1920-45, page 7 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far do David Low’s cartoons show the reasons for the failure of the ...

    collapse of the country's industry which led to the take over of Manchuria and in Italy, economic problems encouraged Mussolini to try to build an overseas empire to distract people attention away from the governments problems. This brings us to David Low's first cartoon commenting on the economic problems that

  2. "Foreign success; domestic failure." How fair is this summary of Bismarck's governance of Germany

    In 1871, this party won 58 seats and became the second largest party in the Reichstag. It favoured greater self-rule for the component states of the Reich and objected to state interference in the Church's traditional sphere of influence, education.

  1. The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust. How valid is this assessment ...

    Strecher, as one of Hitler's earliest followers had a strong idea of what the Nazi leaders wanted to achieve with regards to the persecution of the Jews, and published indoctrinating articles and cartoons such as this one to have an important influential role in anti-Semitism in Germany.

  2. How far did the reforms during the period 1826-39 contribute to the eventual fall ...

    Ahmad agrees; as he puts it, 'such schemes were impossible to introduce while the conservatives were so strongly entrenched. Backed by the Janissaries, they were sufficiently powerful to depose reformist sultans and execute their grand viziers'.x As Mansel points out, 'the official history of enumerated acts of insubordination by the

  1. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    By the end of 1940 the Nazi war machine had 11 concentration camps[11], two years before the Wannsee Conference ever took place, one of those being the most significant of them all; Auschwitz in 1940. and Chelmo had already been using stationary gas vans since the December 1941.

  2. The most important effects of the First World War on Italy between 1915 and ...

    This is linked very closely to the political situation. This was not surprising as the government spent 148 billion lira financing the war. There was also a rise in inflation ? prices were four times higher in 1918 than before the war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work