• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Political Failure and the Butcher of the Dardanelles! How Far do You Agree with This Assessment of Churchills Career Between 1902 and 1918?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"A Political Failure and the Butcher of the Dardanelles!" - How Far do You Agree with This Assessment of Churchill's Career Between 1902 and 1918? When people think of Winston Churchill, a majority will think of his being Prime Minister during the Second World War and the victories that stemmed from this. However, Churchill wasn't always a successful politician, starting off in the army and having to work his way from MP of Oldham to Prime Minister of Britain. The period of 1902-1918 saw a mixture of success and failure. In the early years of his political career, Churchill was the Conservative MP for Oldham, but he resigned from the party in 1905, when they pulled out of government. Churchill was made a junior minister in the new Liberal government, who won the 1906 vote with a landslide victory. It was in this party where Churchill met David Lloyd George, who was, like Churchill, was very interested in the idea of social reform. ...read more.

Middle

Churchill was very proud of the role he had acquired, and poured out all of his ideas to the senior commanders, with their lifetime experience. He was ready to hold the position and he demonstrated the adoration. This was a major high point in his political career, and it was with great excitement that he entered the First World War. An enthusiastic man, Churchill was ready to demonstrate his ability in the role of First Lord of the Admiralty during World War One. However, it was here where people began to question his ability. This stemmed from the huge failure of Gallipoli, in 1915, the same year in which Churchill lost his impressive title. The Gallipoli expedition was meant to result in the defeat of the Ottoman Empire, but the Turkish had the backing of the Germans. They were more prepared than Britain could expect. ...read more.

Conclusion

be wrong, looking at what he has done for our country, but this period of his career was darkened by the Gallipoli expedition, which resulted in the loss of his title; something that caused Churchill great pain. However, the fact he received this title in the first place is enough to suggest he was actually a highly competent politician, and it would be wrong to let one, albeit large, mistake darken his entire career. As for being the 'butcher' of the Dardanelles, it wasn't Churchill's fault entirely. He wasn't given good enough resources for the attack, and he had an incompetent commander in charge, overseas. Also, the Turks had the backing of Germany, therefore they were more prepared than Britain had realised. This failure helped Churchill in the long run, with the D Day victory in World War Two going well because Churchill now knew how not to make an attack. ?? ?? ?? ?? [1]- OCR History A Churchill 1920-45, page 7 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far do David Low’s cartoons show the reasons for the failure of the ...

    faced the world in the early 30's, yet the British, French and US governments were more concerned with their own immediate problems than with the trouble that was brewing for everybody at the other end of the boat. See appendix number 1. In 1931 came the League first real test.

  2. "Foreign success; domestic failure." How fair is this summary of Bismarck's governance of Germany

    All candidates for the priesthood now had to attend a secular university before commencing training, and all religious appointments became subject to state approval, the penalty, if failure to comply, was imprisonment or expulsion. By 1876 all but 12 Prussian Catholic bishops were in exile or under house arrest and more than 1000 priests were suspended from their posts.

  1. How far did the reforms during the period 1826-39 contribute to the eventual fall ...

    There is no doubt that this contributed to its collapse. The ulema, fearing a similar fate [as the Janissaries] offered the government no resistance. As Mansel put it, '[the ulema] fearing similar annihilation if they opposed the government, [they] kept silent'.xvii The 'Blessed Event' was more revenge, than considered reform.

  2. The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust. How valid is this assessment ...

    Strecher, as one of Hitler's earliest followers had a strong idea of what the Nazi leaders wanted to achieve with regards to the persecution of the Jews, and published indoctrinating articles and cartoons such as this one to have an important influential role in anti-Semitism in Germany.

  1. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    in their rise to power and well after they had affirmed this power with the enabling act.[8] Tracing back to the original question at hand, perhaps you could place the argument that genocide can be traced back indefinitely with the savage rise of anti-Semitism throughout the 1930's gripping Germany in

  2. The most important effects of the First World War on Italy between 1915 and ...

    The government printed more money and the value of the Lira at the end of the war was only a quarter of what it was in 1914. More evidence of how to government mishandled the wartime economy is found in the national debt figures: after the war it was 85 billion lira.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work