• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An honourable soldier and statesman. Assess this view of Cromwell in his dealings with enemies of the Commonwealth.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"An honourable soldier and statesman". Assess this view of Cromwell in his dealings with enemies of the Commonwealth. After the execution of King Charles, the Commonwealth was created in an attempt to legitimatise the Republic. However, despite the efforts of Oliver Cromwell, there were still many enemies of the Commonwealth, namely the Irish, Scots, Rump MPs and the Levellers. In August 1649, Cromwell led an expeditionary force to Ireland. He felt that this was necessary because the Irish posed the biggest threat to the new Republic, particularly after the Irish Confederates and English Royalists signed an alliance. In Ireland, Cromwell had two important military victories: at Drogheda and Wexford where an estimated 2000 died at each place. The accusation of indiscriminate slaughter of civilians has been made by numerous historians; but when Cromwell's actions are viewed in the context of 17th century warfare, they appear to be lawful and legitimate. ...read more.

Middle

However, Cromwell's military leadership was not as great as his previous military engagements. He was constantly outmanoeuvred by the Scottish commander, David Leslie, and had to be saved on numerous occasions by his subordinate John Lambert. Despite these defeats, Cromwell was still able to engineer the pivotal victory at Worcester. This suggests that just like during the first civil war Cromwell was again instrumental in the victory and strengthens the claim that he was honourable to the Commonwealth. Therefore, it would appear that Cromwell's actions against the Irish and Scots indicate he was honourable because he fought successfully against enemies who threatened the security of the Commonwealth. Another enemy of the Commonwealth was the Rump MPs who governed the country after the regicide of King Charles. They consisted mainly of merchants and lawyers and were thus unwilling to proceed with some aspects of the godly reformation such as legal reform. ...read more.

Conclusion

before crushing them. The Levellers' frustration and resentment at Cromwell is epitomised by Lilburne's pamphlet "England's New Chains"; they felt that Cromwell had used them, indicating dishonourable conduct. However, the Levellers had been using the New Model Army to advance their radical political demands. Therefore, the claim of Cromwell using the Levellers appears to be hypocritical. Furthermore, in getting rid of the Levellers, Cromwell can be viewed as protecting God's instrument and thus is once more acting in God's interest rather than his own. Therefore, Cromwell's actions against the Levellers are yet another demonstration of him being an honourable statesman and soldier for the Commonwealth. When viewed alongside Cromwell's dealings with other enemies of the Commonwealth, it appears that Cromwell has consistently showed honourable behaviour. In conclusion, "an honourable soldier and statesman" is a valid and rightful interpretation of Cromwell in his dealings with the Irish, Scots, Rump MPs and Levellers. His actions reveal that he was consistently honourable in defending the integrity of the new Republic and trying to introduce godly reformation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain?

    -*8. Nevertheless, Cromwell believed that he was killing a traitor who had previously betrayed parliament by abandoning democracy, and that he was delivering the country from the evil of Charles. In ways, Charles' trial was fair, although the outcome was almost definite even before the trial had started.

  2. An unmitigated disaster. How valid is this assessment of Oliver Cromwells experiment with the ...

    about members of the public who he felt were being robbed through the Act of Indemnity. Therefore due to it bias nature and extreme Anti-Cromwell view it may have reliability problems, due to it being limited to one case. '...the black legend which grew up around them and their demise...this

  1. History Independant study - Oliver Cromwell

    it is fair to describe Cromwell as a King in all but name. Cromwell stood no chance of taking the English throne himself, or even rising to any particularly high level in politics and therefore it was his involvement with the army that gave Cromwell his power and leverage.

  2. Was the Henrician Reformation inevitable?

    Evidence suggests that support for parish churches in general remained high ; for example large numbers of extensions to churches and chapels were built between 1490 and 1529. There is a great deal of evidence to suggest that the Church was in good condition and anti-clericalism only existed in small

  1. Oliver Cromwell.

    When Charles walked into Parliament, John Hampden was one of the people whom he tried to arrest. In 1639, Cromwell's eldest son Robert died. Deeply distraught he returned to politics and all it's contrivances. Finally in 1640, he became the MP for Cambridge and joined the new Parliament.

  2. Oliver Cromwell.

    They made a big contribution to the victory over the king's commanders, Prince Rupert and William Cavendish, 1st Duke of Newcastle, at the Battle of Marston Moor in July 1644. This success was followed by military stalemate, however, and Cromwell, having quarrelled with his commander, Edward Montagu, 2nd Earl of

  1. East of Eden: An Interpretation

    He wasn't very sensible in some of his endeavors (the nice farm he bought, but never capitalized on, the marriage that was doomed to begin with, the lettuce that never made it across the country), but he was as honest as a man could be.

  2. Assess the validity of the view that the Rump and Barebones parliaments had no ...

    This is shown by the restrictions that the Rump placed on the press in September 1650 and the establishment of a monopoly for a government newspaper, Mercurius Policuis, edited by Needham and launched in June 1650. Also Cromwell's swift suppression of Levellers in 1649 and imprisonment of Lilburne further shows the distaste for radicalism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work