• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

It was the weakness of the Provisional Government that brought the October Revolution about rather than the strengths of the Bolsheviks

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"It was the weakness of the Provisional Government that brought the October Revolution about rather than the strengths of the Bolsheviks" The seizure of the power by the Bolsheviks in October 1917 has long been debated by historians. There are many reasons for the 'revolution' occurring with different schools of historical thought emphasising different ones as being the most significant. Although some would definitely argue that the Bolsheviks had many strengths by October 1917, others would argue that the party were 'pushing against an already open door' with the Provisional government being too weak to continue. The Provisional government had many weaknesses, from its' very creation following the Tsar's abdication in February. The very nature of the 'Provisional' government meant it was only seen as a temporary body until elections were held for the Constituent Assembly in November. This meant that people had little respect for the members and the decisions made by them. The make up of the government also damaged the potential it could have. The Petrograd Soviet and the government ruled under the 'Dual Authority' system. ...read more.

Middle

people like the Ukrainians and with no measures being taken to improve the economy or introduce social reform meant that the government appeared no better than previous groups, including the Tsar that went before them. As a result, people continued to show discontent through desertions, striking and looking to other political groups, such as the Bolsheviks who seemed to offer more. With Lenin's return in April and the publication of his Thesis, including the two slogans of 'Peace, Land, Bread' and 'All Power to the Soviets', it appeared that the Bolsheviks could accommodate a huge range of support in Russia. Hungry city workers, frustrated peasants and absconding soldiers from the frontline all felt the party were directly appealing to them and promising to solve these huge issues that the Provisional government had left untouched. The Bolsheviks were the only party that promised an immediate end to fighting and peasant land seizures to be legally recognised. These policies certainly increased the level of support that the party had and throughout the year the numbers choosing to openly back them in the Petrograd Soviet grew. ...read more.

Conclusion

As mentioned, Soviet views would focus mainly on Lenin, but others should be seen as significant. Trotsky was the practical organiser during the seizure of power and his role leading the MRC enabled telegraph offices and railways to be under Bolshevik control. As a 'true Leninist' he was unwilling to boast about his importance following October. Similarly, during Stalin's time in office Trotsky would have been left in the background, as he had been a leadership contender with Stalin after Lenin's death, so it was only after the fall of Communism that his key role would be shown. It is also during the revisionist post glasnost age that the Libertarian view has emerged. With access to more regional documents they would argue that it was the people who forced the revolution and it was people on the ground who forced the change rather that a professional group, such as the Bolsheviks. Libertarians would state that discontent was regularly shown by strikes and that soviets were becoming more and more radicalised. These historians would argue that this force of change would have inevitably lead to change, with or without the Bolsheviks. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    when this was interpreted as meaning that Kerensky was secretly plotting with the Germans to hand over the city so that its revolutionary fires could be quenched. This interpretation was complete nonsense, but Kerensky found it difficult to avoid being associated with comments such as this one, by Mikhail Rodzianko,

  2. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    The Bolshevik Revolution of November 1917 occurred because the Bolsheviks promised solutions to the never ending crises facing the Russian public. The Russian public was unable to vote out the Provisional Government and the Bolshevik's were persistent in turning possible revolutionaries into Bolshevik followers so they could help their revolutionary cause.

  1. Was it the continuation of the First World War the main reason for the ...

    Unfortunately although Kerensky was able to persuade a lot of middle class civilians to volunteer through propaganda he was not successful with the soldiers who did not see the point in fighting for territory when everybody wanted peace. The led to many of them deserting even before the offensive began.

  2. Account For the Success of the Bolsheviks in October 1917

    the February Revolution had disrupted the promise and the Provisional Government needed to implement land reform if they were to maintain support from the peasants. 'The Revolution was inevitable because the people longed for land and had a hatred for landlords,' The Provisional Government had organised an elaborate land scheme

  1. The enormous role that Trotsky played in the success of the Bolsheviks up until ...

    in the streets speaking to the people or travelling Russia on a train, recruiting soldiers like Trotsky often did. Stalin however was most clever, he used his position in the Bolshevik party to appoint his key supporters to higher positions within the party, so that when the time came he

  2. Were the Bolsheviks a positive or negative force for change in Russia?

    In July 1918 the Bolsheviks called the Congress of the Soviets to decide on a number of things. 1) Abolition of all political parties except the Communist party. 2) Move the capital from Petrograd to Moscow. 3) Change the name of the country from Russia to the Russian Soviet Federal Socialist Republic (Lowe).

  1. To what extent was the continuation of the First World War the main reason ...

    This was especially unusual as previous political powers had palmed off the peasants as having no real importance in political matters. The Bolshevik party's growth in support leading up to October was an important factor in the October revolution but was undeniably controlled and initiated by the powerful leadership of

  2. The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 mainly because of the ...

    One of the major weaknesses of the Provisional government was its lack of credibility and authority. For the masses of Russian people the provisional government did not bring immediate change. They were unable to distinguish themselves from the government of the Tsar; in fact many in the government were also

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work