• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

It was the weakness of the Provisional Government that brought the October Revolution about rather than the strengths of the Bolsheviks

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"It was the weakness of the Provisional Government that brought the October Revolution about rather than the strengths of the Bolsheviks" The seizure of the power by the Bolsheviks in October 1917 has long been debated by historians. There are many reasons for the 'revolution' occurring with different schools of historical thought emphasising different ones as being the most significant. Although some would definitely argue that the Bolsheviks had many strengths by October 1917, others would argue that the party were 'pushing against an already open door' with the Provisional government being too weak to continue. The Provisional government had many weaknesses, from its' very creation following the Tsar's abdication in February. The very nature of the 'Provisional' government meant it was only seen as a temporary body until elections were held for the Constituent Assembly in November. This meant that people had little respect for the members and the decisions made by them. The make up of the government also damaged the potential it could have. The Petrograd Soviet and the government ruled under the 'Dual Authority' system. ...read more.

Middle

people like the Ukrainians and with no measures being taken to improve the economy or introduce social reform meant that the government appeared no better than previous groups, including the Tsar that went before them. As a result, people continued to show discontent through desertions, striking and looking to other political groups, such as the Bolsheviks who seemed to offer more. With Lenin's return in April and the publication of his Thesis, including the two slogans of 'Peace, Land, Bread' and 'All Power to the Soviets', it appeared that the Bolsheviks could accommodate a huge range of support in Russia. Hungry city workers, frustrated peasants and absconding soldiers from the frontline all felt the party were directly appealing to them and promising to solve these huge issues that the Provisional government had left untouched. The Bolsheviks were the only party that promised an immediate end to fighting and peasant land seizures to be legally recognised. These policies certainly increased the level of support that the party had and throughout the year the numbers choosing to openly back them in the Petrograd Soviet grew. ...read more.

Conclusion

As mentioned, Soviet views would focus mainly on Lenin, but others should be seen as significant. Trotsky was the practical organiser during the seizure of power and his role leading the MRC enabled telegraph offices and railways to be under Bolshevik control. As a 'true Leninist' he was unwilling to boast about his importance following October. Similarly, during Stalin's time in office Trotsky would have been left in the background, as he had been a leadership contender with Stalin after Lenin's death, so it was only after the fall of Communism that his key role would be shown. It is also during the revisionist post glasnost age that the Libertarian view has emerged. With access to more regional documents they would argue that it was the people who forced the revolution and it was people on the ground who forced the change rather that a professional group, such as the Bolsheviks. Libertarians would state that discontent was regularly shown by strikes and that soviets were becoming more and more radicalised. These historians would argue that this force of change would have inevitably lead to change, with or without the Bolsheviks. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Poor Kerensky soon found himself in the unenviable position of being accused simultaneously of being a traitor and of being a bloodthirsty defensist. The Bolsheviks, on the other hand, were able both to present themselves as the party of peace and simultaneously to demand the defense of the capital.

  2. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    The Bolshevik Revolution of November 1917 occurred because the Bolsheviks promised solutions to the never ending crises facing the Russian public. The Russian public was unable to vote out the Provisional Government and the Bolshevik's were persistent in turning possible revolutionaries into Bolshevik followers so they could help their revolutionary cause.

  1. Was it the continuation of the First World War the main reason for the ...

    Therefore it is hardly surprising that the offensive failed due to the high rate of desertion and mutiny in which soldiers would kill their officers rather than fight. The result was hundreds of thousands of soldiers dying and even more territory was lost.

  2. Account For the Success of the Bolsheviks in October 1917

    The April Thesis had offered land. This was vague and was merely an example of the Bolsheviks paying lip service to the peasants in order to get them onside. But a call for 'Land,' was easy for the predominantly illiterate peasantry to understand.

  1. The enormous role that Trotsky played in the success of the Bolsheviks up until ...

    Not unlike Al Queda today, Trotsky believed that communism was the way forward, so tried to spread the idea to others. Stalin however had other ideas he did not approve of the proposal of a permanent revolution. Stalin didn't want Russia to have to lean on other stronger countries for support.

  2. Why Was The Provisional Government Unable To Stay In Power?

    Another important factor was the attitude of the Germans so if Russia was going to negotiate a peace treaty, it was felt that Russia needed huge resources to accommodate Germany's demands. There were also many other reasons, which contributed to the fall of the Provisional Government.

  1. The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 mainly because of the ...

    The role of the soldiers was very important, especially after the inclusion of their key representatives in the soviets. Although there is evidence that patriotism remained a strong force amongst front line troops, those stations in radicals were particularly radical.

  2. To what extent was the continuation of the First World War the main reason ...

    Lenin is a dominant figure throughout the October revolution, claiming himself to be responsible for the success of the Bolshevik takeover. This was, however, with good reason, as under his control the Bolshevik party flourished. They developed determination, ambition and set their main aim to gain power, in contrast to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work