Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3

Neither Stalin, Khrushchev or Brezhnev successfully addressed fundamental economic problems which increasingly dogged the USSR after the Second World War How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Neither Stalin, Khrushchev or Brezhnev successfully addressed fundamental economic problems which increasingly dogged the USSR after the Second World War" How far do you agree with this statement? After the war, the USSR was destroyed both physically and economically. The challenge for Stalin therefore was to attempt to rebuild the USSR, particularly focusing on industry and the economy in order to ensure that Russia would remain a world superpower. By the end of Brezhnev's era however, the situation was very different. The country had undergone a period of stagnation whereby the economy had failed to improve and grow over his period in power. This was due to his lack of willingness to implement new policies in preference of a "period of stability". I would suggest that although Brezhnev achieved very little, changes were implemented under both Stalin and Khrushchev. However, these changes were often not always overly successful. Stalin did attempt to address the economic damage that the war had caused and therefore try to rebuild the economy. One way in which he did this was to alter the systems in place already in order to tackle the new problems faced. For example, he addressed the growing complexity of the economy by creating more economic ministries. ...read more.

Middle

However, he did introduce a limited number of new policies which had equally limited successes. He successfully addressed that Khrushchev's destructive agricultural policies should be reversed, for example in September 1965 Khrushchev's sovnarkhoz reforms of 1957 were ended. He did successfully increase foreign trade though, for example exporting oil and gold natural resources from Siberia and the period of détente led to the high priority of western technologies being imported. Although the Stalinist economic reforms successfully improved output there are also criticisms that can be raised as evidence that Stalin failed to address the economic problems. The fourth year plan is accused to have been inflexible as it focused on heavy industry rather than light consumer goods. These items were what the country really needed after it had been damaged by the war but instead industry was based on government priorities. Further than this, the emphasis was put on quantity rather than quality and therefore many of the goods produced were not of the highest quality. For example, in order for factory workers to reach their targets, they would produce more pairs of shoes of small sizes as this was quicker and had smaller production costs. ...read more.

Conclusion

Perhaps his largest failure was not to address the problems with the centralised planning system where many of the economic problems initially sprung from. Under Stalin this was successful but by this time the economy had become far too complex to be centralised. Industry also failed to modernise. For example, using the policy of "storming" was used whereby old equipment was run non-stop until the end of the plan which damaged equipment and wasted resources. Thompson suggests that "in structural terms, soviet planners by 1980 had arguably created the world's largest and most advanced nineteenth-century economy". In conclusion, the extent to the leaders successfully addressed the economic problems in Russia was variable under the different personalities. Stalin arguably faced the biggest challenge and due to the fact he did manage to increase production to such a large extent suggests he was the most successful. Although Khrushchev did not solve all of the problems faced, and his agricultural policies caused more harm than good, he did attempt to address the problems that the USSR were facing. On the other hand, Brezhnev's rule did not show any improvement, and further than this he did not show any attempts to improve the problems. For this reason Brezhnev can be suggested to be the least successful. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. "To What Extent Were Gorbachev's Policies the Catalyst to the Fall of the USSR?"

    Conclusion- The conclusion to these sources and historical timeline may be very complicated to assess. Andropov's almost simultaneous rise to power with Ronald Reagan marked a new and final intensification of the Cold War which appeared to die out through the détente years of Brezhnev.

  2. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    and cooperation with people, but by... demanding absolute submission to his opinion.â[3] It is therefore to no surprise, that the implementation of de-Stalinisation was pivotal in permitting development in Russia. De-Stalinisation was a political tool which permitted the political domain of Russia to freely express new political initiatives, without being restricted by fear of opposing the totalitarian regime.

  1. To what extent did living and working conditions improve under Brezhnev?

    Environmental pollution also contributed to many health issues. Birth rates in some regions dropped below the levels sufficient to support the population in the future, and the gender imbalance caused by the Second World War continued. Despite the strain of these problems, state spending on public healthcare declined in favour of defence funding.

  2. "Examine the Effects of the Second World War on the USSR by 1945".

    Soviet leadership became increasingly desperate as other great cities such as Kiev fell, or besieged in the case of Leningrad. As the Nazis closed in on Moscow and defeat loomed 'total war' became a feature of the USSR as a last resort.

  1. Gorbachev(TM)s reforms and policies, which were intended originally to strengthen the Soviet system, eventually ...

    living but in reality, by 1991 the Soviet economy was experiencing a serious economic crisis and a huge increase in the number of people whose living conditions were worse-off than the Gorbachev era. This produced an embittered and angry population, many of whom saw themselves as victims of Perestroika rather than its beneficiaries.

  2. In what way was World War 2 due to the failure of the victors ...

    domination which was to last until 1933"3 From these two analyses, we know that German politics after the unification was authoritarian in nature, which made democratic form of government unique, and so it was foredoomed to fail. Furthermore, German philosophy also had a long tradition of accepting blind obedience to their authority.

  1. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five year plan in 1958 and to ...

    He also wanted to compete with the USA and other communist opponents. The USA feared greatly that the communist party would defeat and take control of other countries. In 1949 Mao's communist government was new but not secure. The GMD forces in Taliwan threatened to re-invade the mainland and topple the government.

  2. Apart from the Second World War, there was peace in Yugoslavia between 1919 and ...

    However in 1989, Serbian control was returned to Kosovo's police force, law courts and defence. Three hundred Albanians were imprisoned following riots and Slobodan Milosovic (the Serbian and Yugoslav President who returned the Serb power to Kosovo) sent troops, tanks and warplanes into Kosovo to impose order.

  • Over 180,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.