• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"A society of onlookers and bystanders. How far do you agree with this description of German society from 1933 to 1939?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"A society of onlookers and bystanders.? How far do you agree with this description of German society from 1933 to 1939? In the years following the electoral victory of the Nazi Party, German attitudes towards the treatment of the Jews can be characterised as passive; the majority were neither actively involved in supporting anti-Semitic policy nor were they willing to offer any significant opposition to it. Saul Friedlander coined the phrased ?onlookers and bystanders?, arguing that the majority of Germans did not share the same degree of enthusiasm for anti-Semitic policy as the Nazis. Goldhagen, however, would argue that Nazi policy towards the Jews was indicative of wider German support, and that the lack of opposition to such policy shows a society that shared in the party?s commitment to eliminationist anti-Semitism. Significantly, from this debate there arises questions of even greater sociological significance ? to what extent is every society comprised of ?onlookers? rather than ?activists?? The attacks on Jews during the weeks following the March 1933 elections, resulting in 40 deaths by June, may seem to indicate a society characterised by the existence of widespread anti-Semitism. However, such actions did not hold the support of the majority of the German people,[1] with even the government distancing itself from these ...read more.

Middle

committed by ordinary Germans who had ?lived, worked, given birth, and buried parents, side by side with them?.[6] Increasing hostility towards the Jews, culminating with Kristallnacht in November 1938, is seen by Goldhagen as revealing the spontaneous nature of actions taken against the Jews. Although the brutality of the original SA perpetrators had been orchestrated by higher party officials, principally Goebbels, many Germans "availed themselves of the opportunity to join the assault on the Jews",[7] and "without provocation or encouragement, participated in the brutalities".[8] Kater has criticised recent historiography that has ?overemphasised the degree of high-level Nazi management,?[9] with Goldhagen suggesting that the actions on Kristallnacht represent the existence of wider societal support for action against the Jews. Although there was no significant opposition to the actions of the Nazis on Kristallnacht,[10] the attitude of the majority of Germans was one of widespread indifference rather than active support. Far from taking part in the violence, the majority of Germans were not involved in the looting and destruction of Jewish property, with one eyewitness account saying, ??the state of indignation that would lead to such excess... was non-existent.?[11] Erich Johnson points out that had such violence been characteristic of the entire population more Jews would have decided to leave Germany than did ...read more.

Conclusion

[3] Norbert Frei, National Socialist Rule in Germany, p.47. [4] Longerich, Holocaust: The Nazi persecution and murder of the Jews, p. 60 - 61 [5] Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, Hitler?s Willing Executioners, p. 90. "Here was the sight of the German volk, organised by the German state, collectively boycotting an entire German group of German citizens" [6] Ibid. p. 94 [7] Ibid. p. 100 [8] Ibid. p. 101 [9] M. H. Kater, Everyday Anti-Semitism in Pre-War Nazi Germany: The Popular Basis [10] Any disgruntlement came predominantly from the wasteful destruction of millions of Reichsmarks worth of property rather than due to ideological objections. [11] Ronnie Landau, Studying the Holocaust, p.63. From the American consul in Leipzig. [12] Eric Johnson, The Nazi Terror: Gestapo, Jews, and Ordinary German, p.140 ?? had the bloodthirsty SA and SS bullies and zealous anti-Semitic Nazi party members been characteristic of the German population, more Jews might have made the decision to leave before it was too late.? [13] http://www.thirteen.org/openmind/foreign-affairs/hitlers-willing-executioners-part-i/563/ ?Individual Germans in Germany could have done little to prevent what happened but if millions of Germans had been opposed to the persecution of the Jews in the 1930s? then they could have done something?? [14] Ian Kershaw, Hitler, the Germans, and the Final Solution, p.199 [15] http://heroicimagination.org/public-resources/social-influence-forces/bystander-effect-and-diffusion/ ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitler's Willing Executioners - The role of Ordinary Germans during the Holocaust

    in 1933 when Hitler announced that the Jews were to be exterminated. Jews had been victims of destructive action for many centuries and this began in the fourth century in Rome after Christ. The Jews were forced to convert to Christianity but the Jews refused because they saw that "Christ

  2. "Nazi policy towards the Jews up to 1939 was uncoordinated and erratic."

    It is clear to see that to a certain extent Jewish policy was a result of a revolution from below. Hitler could not control fully his S.A troops as has been highlighted prior. However, the following the list of instructions to be carried out was a statement that no Jew should be physically harmed during this 'atrocity campaign.'

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Until the late 1960s German schools continued past practices of neglecting the importance of contemporary history in favor of more remote historical periods, thereby making it conveniently impossible to confront the recent Nazi past. As the tranquil Adenauer years began to fade by the mid-1960s, giving way to a decade

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    the Provisional government in the form of two Socialist Revolutionary ministers, two Menshevik ministers and two independent socialist ministers, the government was still headed by Prince L'vov. This was a significant event when the concept of dual power is being considered because it brought the socialist leaders of the Soviets

  1. The Holocaust

    The war had had a huge impact on Hitler. He had gone into the war as an aimless failed artist and emerged the other side as a determined man with a sense of purpose. Hitler gained respect and credibility in right wing circles as he had fought bravely during the war, earning the Iron Cross.

  2. To what extent did Hitlers Policies attract working class support between 1933 and 1939?

    However "nominal hourly wages in 1933 were 97 per cent of...1932"5 and in this regard the 'miracle' was not realized in tangible economic terms. Therefore as early as 1935 SOPADE reported economic uncertainty placed "great strain on the mental strength".6 The SOPADE reports naturally contained a sentiment opposed to the regime as an extension of their political endeavors.

  1. In the years 1933 " 1945 the German Churches supported and collaborated with the ...

    When Hitler became Chancellor the Churches had extensive autonomy and influence, consisting of 65 million members, and threatened the Volgskemeinschaft which the Nazi regime aimed to create. Hitler preceded attempts to control, weaken and ultimately replace the Churches, yet generally they failed to collaborate with or resist the Nazis.

  2. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    They draw on the structure and institution of the third Reich, asserting that Hitler derived much of his strength from the rivalry of a vast array of competing power blocks within the structure of the state who competed for his approval and the overlapping responsibilities of state and party institutions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work