• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

A Study of Air Supremacy in the Korean War.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History 333, The Historical Method-- Arthur Coumbe, Professor A Study of Air Supremacy in the Korean War By Tom Spearman The Korean War was the first major test of the newly formed United States Air Force. It had been in existence for only three years when North Korea invaded South Korea on June 25, 1950. The North Koreans purpose was to attempt to unite the country under communist rule. When hostilities first broke out the United States war machine was not fully prepared to stop the aggression. War material was in great supply but it had to be brought out of storage. More importantly, most of the experienced military personnel had returned to the civilian sector. The Far East Air Force (FEAF), composed of the Thirteenth in the Philippines, the Twentieth on Guam, and the Fifth in Japan, were responsible for carrying the air war to the enemy.1 The journal, Air Power History, chronicles the stages of the air war and focuses on the integral components that made up the totality of America's response to achieve and maintain air superiority. The aim of the journal was to examine the contributions of each component and demonstrate how their integration as a cohesive force helped achieve their goal, which in turn led to a peaceful settlement. Specifically it looked at the commanders, logistics, combat cargo, strategic interdiction, close air support, aerial combat, search and rescue, and reconnaissance. The historian, William T. Y'Blood of the Air Force History Support Office, and several others wrote and compiled many of the articles in the journal concerning this period. The discussion will focus and highlight on the information found in these articles to determine the accuracy and relevancy of their historiography. The plan for air power at the beginning of the conflict was simple and straightforward. The United States Army and Navy were able to halt the North Korean advance because FEAF was able to obtain and maintain air superiority within one month against the relatively weak North Korean Air Force. ...read more.

Middle

I became particularly irate when I found new holes very near a main wing tank. I walked over to the radio jeep and told the operator. He called down two fighters and each dropped a napalm tank on the knoll. Blood curdling screams rose up as the deadly liquid rolled downhill. After that show of air superiority, I returned to my C-47 and got on board. As my eyes transitioned from bright sunlight to dim interior light, I eyed my load: a significant number of men lay frozen as they had fallen, with their extremities cast in all directions and faces contorted statues of severe pain. They were stacked and intertwined on each side of the cabin, secured with ropes for flight. I would be flying an aerial hearse, but to do it with dignity I flew extra smoothly. 25 From Colonel Fritz's account it is apparent that even those who flew cargo missions were not immune from hostile activity. After the battle line stabilized at the 38th parallel his squadron was put at further risk when it was decided a forward operating detachment would be established at Kimpo, South Korea. The journal Air Power History covers the role of airlift and logistics in several articles, emphasizing the importance of its role. It relied upon primary sources, such as the author noted above and secondary ones, to include William Y'Blood and William Suit. Logistics and movement of cargo by air were almost like a single entity in that they were the life-blood for the troops on the ground and pilots fighting in the air. The war simply could not have been won without their contribution. The next part of this paper will focus on the combatants who fought in the skies over Korea and the role they played to help win air supremacy. Specifically it will analyze FEAF's strategic and tactical efforts, including their failures and successes. ...read more.

Conclusion

2 (Summer 2001): 18. 14 Ibid, 19. 15 Ibid, 20. 16 Ibid. 17 Ibid. 18 Ibid, 21. 19 Ibid, 22. 20 Ibid, 23. 24 C-47 aircraft were the only ones in the Korean War that could operate out of primitive airstrips. In this particular case the Marines had bulldozed the airfield to 5,000 feet at the cost of many lives. Heavy equipment operators working at night under floodlights were shot at routinely while they worked. Paul C. Fritz, "The Kysuhu Gypsy Squadron in Korea," Air Power History, Vol. 47, No 3 (Fall 2000): 10. 25 Ibid, 11. The Marines at Chosin Reservoir sustained over 8,000 casualties, including 751 killed and over 2,800 wounded. The rest were non-battle victims, mostly from the cold. 26 William T. Y'Blood, "B-29s Over Korea," APH, Vol. 47, No. 2 (Summer 2000): 26. 27 Joe Baugher, "Boeing B-29 Superfortress," [book on-line]; available on www.csd.uwo.ca/`pettypi/elevon/baugher_us/b029.html; Internet accessed on 18 November 2002. 28 Ibid. 29 Ibid. 30 William T. Y'Blood, "Air Superiority," APH, Vol. 47, No. 2 (Summer 2000): 16. 31 Forrest L. Marion, "Sabre Pilot Pickup: Unconventional Contributions to Air Superiority in Korea," APH, Vol.49, No. 1 (Spring 2002): 24-25. 32 Ibid, 25. 33 Ibid, 27. 34 Ibid, 23. 35 Ibid, 24. 36 William T. Y'Blood, "Search and Rescue," APH, Vol. 47, No. 2 (Summer 2000): 43. 37 William T. Y'Blood, "Reconnaissance," APH, Vol. 47, No. 2 (Summer 2000): 37. 38 Robert F. Futrell, The United States Air Force in Korea, Washington, D.C., Office of Air Force History, United States Air Force, 1983: 545. 39 Ibid, 555. 40 Ibid, 548. 41 Ibid, 551. 42 On page 37 of "Reconnaissance," in APJ, Vol. 47, No. 2 (Summer 2000): on page 37 the author W. Y'Blood cited overall statistics on reconnaissance activity without giving a source. I found the source, cross-referencing it to pages 555 of Robert Futrell's book The United States Air Force in Korea. The information was copied almost word for word. More than likely it was just an oversight. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Moon Landing: Conspiracy or Reality?

    In this essay I have analyzed the physiological, political and technological views surrounding the controversy around landing on the moon in July 21st 1969.

  2. How important was the war at sea

    War at sea was successful while Britain was blocking German navy, this helped Britain take the control of the seas therefore she could support Western Front and Home Front. The War at sea was equally balanced in both sides. It would be a great advantage for one side to get the control of the seas.

  1. Korean propaganda during the Second World War and the Korean War had a different ...

    and a general understanding of the circumstances, and strategies of the countries involved. Korea is a country that is not very well known to the general public. Only one specific historical event highlights it; the Korean War. Korea was also deeply involved in the Second World War, although not many

  2. Free essay

    The Korean War represented total defeat for the Truman Doctrine? H. Brogan. How far ...

    pawn for the war that was going on between them, however, in perspective, this was not full blown war with the USSR ad therefore the aim was succeeded, proving, with this aim, Brogan's argument is wrong. As it has been previously mentioned, this was meant to be a war to help free people.

  1. Reaction Paper on the documentaries "Korea" and "Spies"

    for one main reason: to know whether their enemy state intends to fight them. And the documentary concludes that the answer lay hidden not in a satellite photo, or an agent report, but in the minds of their opponents. The second documentary, "Korea," on the other hand, focused on the Military Capability as an instrument of foreign policy.

  2. To what extent was the Korean conflict of 1950 to 1953 a 'turning point' ...

    With the outbreak of the Korean War, however, the fear of a revived Germany was transcended by an intense paranoia of communist expansion.

  1. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    In 1814, however, an invading army from Canada was repelled. Then, just as a peace treaty was being concluded in Ghent (Belgium), Andrew JACKSON crushed another invading British army as it sought to take New Orleans. The war thus ended on a triumphant note, and the republic was confirmed.

  2. Why did the United States become so deeply involved in the Korean War in ...

    For the first time, there had been a reverse in the traditional US policy of isolationism and the US was no longer involved solely on the basis of direct interests being a factor. As a result, these factors contribute to the idea of the US being more deeply involved in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work