• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A study of why the USSR signed a non aggression pact with Germany rather than with the Western Powers?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A study of why the USSR signed a non aggression pact with Germany rather than with the Western Powers? Ana Gosnar Mr. Rowe May 30, 2004 Word Count: 1798 CONTENTS: A. Plan of investigation Page 3 B. Summary of Evidence Page 3-4 C. Evaluation of Sources Page 5 D. Analysis Page 5-6 E. Conclusion Page 7 F. List of Sources Page 8 A study of why the USSR signed a non-aggression pact with Germany rather than with the Western Powers? A Plan of the investigation This investigation will try to establish why Stalin signed a non-aggression pact with Hitler rather than with the Western powers. In the main body of this historical investigation it will be discussed why Stalin signed the pact with Hitler, with Germany's and USSR's specific aims stated, and why and where they originated. Also discussed will be the events occurring prior to the signing of the non-aggression pact, with specific emphasis on the League of Nations, the Treaty of Versailles and The Munich conference. The previous foreign relations between the USSR and Germany and the USSR and other European countries will also be conveyed. B Summary of evidence Soviet foreign policy wanted to build a system of alliances which would end the USSR's isolation from the world. Stalin feared that Germany would be pulled in an alliance against Soviet Russia with the Western Powers.1 His fear increased when Germany joined ...read more.

Middle

The book mostly concentrates on what the pact led to in relation to the Baltic States. The reason this book was valuable was because it shows how other countries saw the pact between Russia and Germany. Its limitations might include that it is written by a Latvian author, so some events are written from a Latvian point of view. Grey Ian (1982). Stalin -Man of Steel. Great Britain: Cox & Wyman Ltd. This book is written by a British author Ian Grey, I understand that this is one the best bibliography's about Stalin written by a non communist. This book's main advantage was that it had a section between the wars, where it described Stalin's and the USSR's views on Russia and how it affected the world. Even though the book was concentrating on Stalin, most of the important events and names were mentioned. Some limitations that are noticeable are that the author is biased, in some cases, and also that the book doesn't give all the detail of some of the important events that happened. D Analysis The USSR and Germany were the most unlikely countries to enter into a pact of any sort that one can imagine at the time. During the 1930's Hitler had made no secrets of his racial contempt for the Slavs, his political contempt of Bolshevism and his ideas of territorial expansion into the USSR to create 'Lebensraum' for the master race of Aryans. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin's fear was an additional reason why he signed the pact; he thought that the Western Powers with Germany were forming a block against him and if he had a treaty with Germany their plans wouldn't succeed. A further reason to keep in mind is that the Western Powers were not fully dedicated to accomplishing a reasonable treaty with the Soviets in 1939. This could be due to the fact that the Western Powers were in total opposition to communist Russia. The Nazi-Soviet non-aggression pact also provided Stalin with the advantages territorial gains and trade agreements. F Sources: Boyce R. & Roberson E. (1989). Paths to War. London: Macmillan Education ltd. Farmer Alan (2000). Modern European History 1890-1990. London: Hodder & Stoughton. Grey Ian (1982). Stalin -Man of Steel. Great Britain: Cox & Wyman Ltd. Kissinger, Henry. (1994). Diplomacy. New York: Simon& Schuster. Read A. & Fisher D. (1988). The Deadly Embrace. New York: W.W Norton & Company Reyner E.G. (1999). The Great Dictatorships: international relations 1918-39. London: Hodder & Stoughton. Vizulis Izidors (1988). The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of 1939. New York: Praeger Publishers. 1 Grey Ian (1982). Stalin -Man of Steel. (Great Britain: Cox & Wyman Ltd.) 295. 2 IBID 296. 3 Vizulis Izidors (1988). The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of 1939. (New York: Praeger Publishers.) 19. 4 IBID 22 5 Grey 309 6 Read A. & Fisher D. (1988). (The Deadly Embrace. New York: W.W Norton & Company) 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Hitler cultivated this gift of memory assiduously. The fact that subsequently the details and figures which he cited were often found to contain inaccuracies did not matter: it was the immediate effect at which he aimed. The swiftness of the transition from one mood to another was startling: one moment

  2. Why did Stalin sign the Nazi-Soviet Pact?

    He believed Hitler was neither prepared nor foolish enough to attempt a war in two fronts, so persuading the german F�hrer into a peace treaty might rather make him attempt a war in western Europe- at least for a while.

  1. Versailles Treaty- evaluation of sources

    She is valid in arguing that Hitler's actions greatly contributed to conflict as witnessed in 1939 when he invaded Poland causing further problems. However she fails to recognise that Versailles equally had an effect on problems that followed. This is a limitation in her argument and is perhaps deliberate as

  2. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    Even so this topic is sensitive and resulted in historians shying away from the subject to avoid controversy. Also the issue of comparing the death toll is seen as unjustified because Stalin's death toll does not deduct from the monstrous acts Hitler committed.

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    For example if you wanted to change job in 1926 you needed the permission of your boss. He however was likely to say no unless you were a bad worker. Then he would tell the police and you could be prosecuted because you didn't like your job.

  2. Why did Stalin Agree to the Nazi-Soviet Pact?

    Stalin and Litvinov strongly believed in collective security, and reckoned if all the countries of Europe stood up to Hitler, he could be defeated.

  1. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    Conditions worsened under Stalin. There was a desperate need for currency to fund rapid industrialisation. With the threat of war present collectivisation was quickly put in place. Historians call this the Great Turn, and some believe that this is the point at which the Soviet Union 'went wrong'.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    all people collectively ?owned? factories or shops or the state did on behalf of the people. As early as 1929, less than 1% of large-scale industry was in the private sector, and the few remaining factories were closed in 1930.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work