• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To vote for Hitler was above all a rejection of the existing system. Is this a wholly satisfactory explanation of the dramatic increase in Nazi electoral support during the years 1930-1933?

Extracts from this document...


'To vote for Hitler was above all a rejection of the existing system.' Is this a wholly satisfactory explanation of the dramatic increase in Nazi electoral support during the years 1930-1933? During 1930-1933 with the economic downturn effecting Germany to a huge extent the German population found they were more likely to vote for extreme politics; the Nazis were just the political party in the right place at the right time. The Weimar Republic had looked weak for several years by 1933 and the Nazis had started to gain votes but it was not just the votes that brought the Nazi Party into power. None of the Party's in the Reichstag in 1932 had been able to gain a substantial majority and Article 48 had already demolished any democracy or political system that had stabilised Germany during the 1920s through the leadership of Stresemann or Ebert, it was therefore the quest for stability that turned the German population to look for a different style of leadership. The Nazi Party could be seen as a very well designed Party, it had a private army, the SA, it had some of the best orators, it used propaganda and the Volkischer Beobachter to inform the nation of the arising problems of the economy and the invasion of the Ruhr, along with blaming the trouble in Germany on the 'November Criminals'. ...read more.


The Nazi Party was born in the economic downturn after the First World War. It was very much a people's party and the issues raised by Adolf Hitler at the meetings were very much geared around the public attitude towards the 'November Criminals' and the 'Treaty of Versailles'. The hyperinflation was therefore an external factor that allowed the Nazis to gain more support and for the Party to be strengthen. At the invasion of the Ruhr the Nazis again turned their focus to campaigning, using propaganda, and voicing public opinion about the betrayal of the Weimar and the breaking of the Treaty of Versailles by the French. It was from the foundations laid in the 1920s, by using propaganda and rallies and media, along with the terror tactics and the strength of the SA that persuaded the German people to vote for the Nazis and away from the more moderate parties in the Reichstag. The Nazis were successful at attracting the support of the young, particularly students; in 1930 over two-thirds of the party's members were under the age of 40. It was this that the Nazis were very good at. They encouraged the younger generation to vote for them, they captured the hearts and the minds of the young people, making them believe that the party was aimed at the good of the German Volk. ...read more.


Everything that went on within the depths of the Nazis Party was not discussed or publicised further than the people closest to Hitler. As the confidence in the Weimar Republic dropped and the gaps within the system started to emerge they were heavily publicised and people could see that it was breaking down from the inside out. After the death of Stresemann, Germany never really recovered its leadership until Hitler took the chancellorship in January 1933. It was therefore through the portrayed stability of the structure of the Party, a party with its own army and a heroic orator that the votes for the Nazis started to increase. You could argue that it was not Hitler that made the German people vote for the Nazi Party. We can see that whilst Hitler was imprisoned in Landsberg there were still people prepared to vote for the Nazi Party and that it had been steadily supported throughout the 1920s. Equally, when Hitler appears on the stage again in 1928 and reclaims the party the vote significantly increases and makes it more plausible that it was the combination of the Nazis Party's contrasting views, compared to the Weimar Republic's views, and the leadership of Hitler that encouraged and persuaded more people to vote for the Nazi Party between 1930-1933. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the reasons why the Weimar Republic faced so many problems in the 1920s

    This increased fears in the middle and upper classes of revolution and increased the fears of socialists that the power war government would not listen to the demands of the workers, as they had been so brutally crushed. The Munich Revolution, also in 1919, was successful for the communists who took control of Bavaria, declaring it the Bavarian Soviet Republic.

  2. The appointment of Hitler as Chancellor in 1933 was primarily the result of Nazi ...

    Hindenburg received his old family bankrupt estate at Neudeck in the east, as an 80th Birthday present, this was intended to keep him close to Junker's interests.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    and emigration of others; economic reforms; relief administration; and more rigid control of their own troops. The more shocking and glaring aspects of this occupation period were thus gradually eliminated. Deep scars of a moral and psychic nature remained. These scars added more complexity to the already difficult problems of the new German state.

  2. To what extent was the increase in electoral support for the Nazis in the ...

    It can be said that the nature of the Weimar Republic contributed to its own downfall and the Nazis resultant rise; in response to the indecisive coalition, the public favoured the regimented ideology of the Nazis. Both the collapse of democracy through Article 48 and the lack of policy making

  1. How and why did the Weimar Governments collapse between October 1929 and January 1933?

    As mentioned before, when things get tough, the people not only lose faith in the current leaders but look to the revolutionaries for guidance, and in 1930 things certainly got tougher. The rapid bankruptcy of hundreds of businesses that could no longer afford to pay their workers, who in turn

  2. No more than a fringe irritant on Weimar politics. How far does this description ...

    In 1924, membership of the party declined from 6.5% of the vote in May to 3% in December, and Hitler was banned from speaking in public in Germany between until 1927. The fact that Hitler was imprisoned halted the progress of the Nazi Party at 20,000 members in Bavaria for most of 1924.

  1. How far do you agree that Hitler became chancellor in January 1933 primarily due ...

    with Hitler as chancellor and Von Pappen as Vice-chancellor, Wealthy businessmen and the president went along with this because of the fact that they thought Pappen, not Hitler would be controlling the new government.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The Soviet economy could not maintain both a massive defence capability and a high standard of living at the same time. 2. Although production increased, the quality of most goods (esp. consumer) was poor. Must be kept in mind that soviet statistics were unreliable and often deliberately exaggerated ï

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work