• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To vote for Hitler was above all a rejection of the existing system. Is this a wholly satisfactory explanation of the dramatic increase in Nazi electoral support during the years 1930-1933?

Extracts from this document...


'To vote for Hitler was above all a rejection of the existing system.' Is this a wholly satisfactory explanation of the dramatic increase in Nazi electoral support during the years 1930-1933? During 1930-1933 with the economic downturn effecting Germany to a huge extent the German population found they were more likely to vote for extreme politics; the Nazis were just the political party in the right place at the right time. The Weimar Republic had looked weak for several years by 1933 and the Nazis had started to gain votes but it was not just the votes that brought the Nazi Party into power. None of the Party's in the Reichstag in 1932 had been able to gain a substantial majority and Article 48 had already demolished any democracy or political system that had stabilised Germany during the 1920s through the leadership of Stresemann or Ebert, it was therefore the quest for stability that turned the German population to look for a different style of leadership. The Nazi Party could be seen as a very well designed Party, it had a private army, the SA, it had some of the best orators, it used propaganda and the Volkischer Beobachter to inform the nation of the arising problems of the economy and the invasion of the Ruhr, along with blaming the trouble in Germany on the 'November Criminals'. ...read more.


The Nazi Party was born in the economic downturn after the First World War. It was very much a people's party and the issues raised by Adolf Hitler at the meetings were very much geared around the public attitude towards the 'November Criminals' and the 'Treaty of Versailles'. The hyperinflation was therefore an external factor that allowed the Nazis to gain more support and for the Party to be strengthen. At the invasion of the Ruhr the Nazis again turned their focus to campaigning, using propaganda, and voicing public opinion about the betrayal of the Weimar and the breaking of the Treaty of Versailles by the French. It was from the foundations laid in the 1920s, by using propaganda and rallies and media, along with the terror tactics and the strength of the SA that persuaded the German people to vote for the Nazis and away from the more moderate parties in the Reichstag. The Nazis were successful at attracting the support of the young, particularly students; in 1930 over two-thirds of the party's members were under the age of 40. It was this that the Nazis were very good at. They encouraged the younger generation to vote for them, they captured the hearts and the minds of the young people, making them believe that the party was aimed at the good of the German Volk. ...read more.


Everything that went on within the depths of the Nazis Party was not discussed or publicised further than the people closest to Hitler. As the confidence in the Weimar Republic dropped and the gaps within the system started to emerge they were heavily publicised and people could see that it was breaking down from the inside out. After the death of Stresemann, Germany never really recovered its leadership until Hitler took the chancellorship in January 1933. It was therefore through the portrayed stability of the structure of the Party, a party with its own army and a heroic orator that the votes for the Nazis started to increase. You could argue that it was not Hitler that made the German people vote for the Nazi Party. We can see that whilst Hitler was imprisoned in Landsberg there were still people prepared to vote for the Nazi Party and that it had been steadily supported throughout the 1920s. Equally, when Hitler appears on the stage again in 1928 and reclaims the party the vote significantly increases and makes it more plausible that it was the combination of the Nazis Party's contrasting views, compared to the Weimar Republic's views, and the leadership of Hitler that encouraged and persuaded more people to vote for the Nazi Party between 1930-1933. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the reasons why the Weimar Republic faced so many problems in the 1920s

    In early April, 1920, the Ruhr Red Army was crushed when the Government sent more troops into the Ruhr to re-conquer the area. Therefore, the way in which the uprisings from each side were dealt with varied, which caused problems for the government.

  2. How and why did the Weimar Governments collapse between October 1929 and January 1933?

    As mentioned before, when things get tough, the people not only lose faith in the current leaders but look to the revolutionaries for guidance, and in 1930 things certainly got tougher. The rapid bankruptcy of hundreds of businesses that could no longer afford to pay their workers, who in turn

  1. Assess the impact of Nazi ideology on the Social Classes.

    Hitler had little or no respect for the social elite whilst he was in power and the feeling was similar reversed, in that many aristocrats thought that Hitler was a danger to their class and their high status in society.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    These were, in the first place, ethnic Germans expelled from Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Yugoslavia, Rumania, and Poland, in order to cleanse those countries from German minority problems. Secondly, there were Germans who fled or were expelled from the former German territories annexed by Poland and the Soviet Union in the east, namely, Silesia and East Prussia.

  1. Discuss Hitler’s eventual gaining of Lebensraum. Was it merely opportunistic or astutely ...

    ' That is what i have to prevent. We must proceed step by step, so that no-one will impede our advance. How to do this I don't yet know..." This conversation between Hitler and Hermann is very convincing in Hitler not having a plan but a set of goals.

  2. To what extent was the increase in electoral support for the Nazis in the ...

    It can be said that the nature of the Weimar Republic contributed to its own downfall and the Nazis resultant rise; in response to the indecisive coalition, the public favoured the regimented ideology of the Nazis. Both the collapse of democracy through Article 48 and the lack of policy making

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    2. To intensify the population?s vigilance and loyalty. 3. Old Bolsheviks were picked out in particular. Although they were not a significant threat to Stalin by 1936, Stalin was vengeful, and he had not forgotten the opposition to himself in the 1920s of men like Zinoviev and Kamenev. 4. Stalin?s desire to cement his power and eliminate possible rivals.

  2. No more than a fringe irritant on Weimar politics. How far does this description ...

    In many respects the putsch was a farce. The Nazi Party was banned and Hitler stood trial for his part in the attempt to overthrow the Weimar democracy by force, receiving the minimum sentence of five years imprisonment. In addition to this, the NSDAP was banned from politics, thus they were not able to take part in the 1924 elections.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work